Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 04 Dec 2006 (Monday) 10:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Beach under full moon

 
dougxt
Member
155 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
     
Dec 04, 2006 10:54 |  #1

Took a trip to a local beach last night and did some shooting under the (almost) full moon. C & C welcome. thanks for looking.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

http://www.dougjonesph​oto.com (external link)
50d, sigma 10-20mm, tamron 17-50mm, sigma 70-300, canon 50mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjafari
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Dec 04, 2006 10:56 |  #2

i like the 2nd one more, and it is mostly because of the stars not being there. If you were to remove the few stars in the 1st one, then i would prefer that one (the portrait orientation is really nice for that shot). I love the effect from the water on the rocks.


-Shehab-
http://www.fotojafari.​net (external link)

5Dii, 16-35/2.8ii, 24-70/2.8, 135/2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alan_potter
wireless groping system
Avatar
2,408 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 658
Joined May 2005
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
     
Dec 04, 2006 10:59 as a reply to  @ sjafari's post |  #3

Gorgeous ethereal feel

regards,
/alan


Falkirk, Scotland.
Project 365 Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dougxt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
155 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
     
Dec 04, 2006 11:06 |  #4

sjafari wrote in post #2351980 (external link)
i like the 2nd one more, and it is mostly because of the stars not being there. If you were to remove the few stars in the 1st one, then i would prefer that one (the portrait orientation is really nice for that shot). I love the effect from the water on the rocks.

hmm, I think you may right....something like this?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

http://www.dougjonesph​oto.com (external link)
50d, sigma 10-20mm, tamron 17-50mm, sigma 70-300, canon 50mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjafari
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Dec 04, 2006 11:12 |  #5

yes! My eyes kept going to the stars, and now they focus more on the water and rocks (where the beauty of the image really is).


-Shehab-
http://www.fotojafari.​net (external link)

5Dii, 16-35/2.8ii, 24-70/2.8, 135/2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
radloser
Senior Member
Avatar
277 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2006
     
Dec 04, 2006 11:31 |  #6

i like it both ways....how long was the exposure?


BillsImages.com (external link)
Canon A620
Nikon D850, D300 and D80 - I know, shut up!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dougxt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
155 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
     
Dec 04, 2006 11:33 |  #7

thanks for the comments!

exposure time was 123 seconds.


http://www.dougjonesph​oto.com (external link)
50d, sigma 10-20mm, tamron 17-50mm, sigma 70-300, canon 50mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
radloser
Senior Member
Avatar
277 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2006
     
Dec 04, 2006 12:15 |  #8

thanks for sharing


BillsImages.com (external link)
Canon A620
Nikon D850, D300 and D80 - I know, shut up!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mws3
Tartan abuser
756 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: perth Scotland
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:07 |  #9

no.1 without the stars

nice shootin



Mark
_______________
Kit: 350D, 18-55mm lens, 70-200 Sigma, 55-300Sigma,Tamron 17-50mm, polarisers, canon remote, battery pack Lee filters and more to come

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
banana
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Dec 04, 2006 15:10 |  #10

what lens did you use? Those are great.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marcdpalmer
Member
Avatar
117 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Dec 04, 2006 15:25 |  #11

excellent. I really like them both. I think the 1st without the stars is better though,as said above. Care to share shutter speed f stop etc???


Keeping me sane, an island of decency in a sea of turds...
30D | Tamron 28-75 2.8 Di | Canon 70-200L IS 2.8 | 580 EX Speedlight | Manfrotto tripod | Soon to buy a Canon 17-40L...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rudgej
Couch-potato photographer
5,613 posts
Joined Jul 2005
     
Dec 04, 2006 15:26 |  #12

These are nice photos, and the long exposure has resulted in a very nice water effect. They would all look even better if the horizon was straight though. ;)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lesmac
Goldmember
Avatar
1,829 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Otley , Yorkshire, UK
     
Dec 04, 2006 16:39 |  #13

Good shots, good composition and well controlled whites, although your contrast line (trees/sky) has suffered under conpression


Canon 1DS MKIII,7D, 85 1.2L, 24 F1.4L, 135 F2L, 200mm F2.8L,50mm F1.4, 120-300 F2.8, 12-24mm f 4.5
http://www.lesmclean.c​o.uk/ (external link)
Concentrate on equipment and you'll take technically good photographs. Concentrate on seeing the light's magic colours and your images will stir the soul. - Jack Dykinga

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frank_Hollahan
Goldmember
Avatar
2,718 posts
Likes: 97
Joined Feb 2005
     
Dec 04, 2006 17:04 |  #14

Very nice shots Doug. The first has to be my favorite-with the stars.
Where did you shoot these?
Had a look at your site, very ncie shots there as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ T
Goldmember
Avatar
2,224 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
     
Dec 04, 2006 17:09 |  #15

Doug, can you post links to larger versions? These look wonderful, but I think viewing them as larger images would really do them justice. Also, I have a suggestion for the stars...you could always make your own, or copy and past sharper ones in from another image. I think stars WOULD add something to the sky, but since these are blurry, they detract from the image.


- 5D & 60D (x2), EFS 10-22, EF 17-40L, EF 50 f1.4, EF 24-105L, EF 100-400 L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,249 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Beach under full moon
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2848 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.