Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 04 Dec 2006 (Monday) 13:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What does Error99 mean?

 
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:01 |  #1

First time ever this weekend I got this Error99 message on my camera.

I was shooting Macro with my 20D, Grip, 100mm Macro, and RingFlash and went vertical on my monopod and got this error.

Anyone have an idea what my camera is trying to tell me? I just turned the camera off then on again and it went away.

Thanks.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ephemeral
Senior Member
Avatar
896 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK (London)
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:03 |  #2

What does the manual say?


Canon 5D + Grip | 85mm L f/1.2 | 17-40mm L f/4.0 | [COLOR=Silver]24-70mm L f/2.8 |[COLOR=Black] 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS | Speedlite 580EX & 430EX | Manfrotto 190Pro + 488RC2
ephemeral.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:09 |  #3

Uusally error between lens and body. Hard reboot camera (remove battery) after removing and remounting the lens. Maybe try an eraser on the contacts.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:11 |  #4

Err99 is a catch-all. In your particular case it might have been that the extra weight of the ring-light on the macro lens caused the lens and body electronic contacts to pull slightly apart. Why in Portrait orientation? Because ofthe angle of the stress. Options? IIRC someone makes a mount whiich will support both lens and body for just these shotting situations.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:15 |  #5

Jon wrote in post #2352451 (external link)
Err99 is a catch-all. In your particular case it might have been that the extra weight of the ring-light on the macro lens caused the lens and body electronic contacts to pull slightly apart. Why in Portrait orientation? Because ofthe angle of the stress. Options? IIRC someone makes a mount whiich will support both lens and body for just these shotting situations.

Another very viable problem causing the error. SL, Process of elimination will find it for you.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huw1000
Member
Avatar
62 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Wales
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:19 as a reply to  @ cosworth's post |  #6

Just means some cosmic wind was blowing the right direction to throw some crazy space energy into your camera and make it go crazy.


Click Here and Join the POTN flickr Group Today! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:39 |  #7

according to this blog, he called Canon service and was told to clean the lens contact surfaces. My understanding has been that it means a body/lens is having communication issues, but I don't recall an official note from Canon about this.
http://www.richardsnot​es.org …50mm-lens-contact-points/ (external link)


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 04, 2006 13:41 |  #8

Err99 is a general error which may mean the body and lens are experiencing communicatiooon issues. It has also occurred for shutter problems among other causes. It's a general "Something happened that we didn't expect; we know something's wrong but aren't sure quite where".


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4070
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 04, 2006 14:20 |  #9

Oh boy, my favorite subject. (just kidding). Anyway, it sounds as if you have a transient ERR99 and maybe the flash hanging off was the cause. Keep an eye out and see if it comes back. Anyway, sometimes cleaning the contacts works if the cause is poor or intermittent connections. But it can also be something worse. I had two lenses one which would not focus and would ERR-99 and the other constantly overexposed because it could not adjust the aperture. That also ERR-99ed. I would keep an eye on your picture quality as well and keep an eye out for other symptoms which could indicate an imminent mechanical failure as well.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jfrancho
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,341 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Dec 04, 2006 14:22 |  #10

It's like a check engine light, but worse.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys
Dis-Membered
Avatar
5,351 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Columbia SC
     
Dec 04, 2006 14:24 |  #11

Err99 on my XT (and I presume it's similar on other models) is pretty meaningless.

On my XT I get this with my Tamron 70-300. It's not a dislike of the lens nor dirty contacts. It seems purely random. I shot 150 photos with that lens on without removing it. At about shot 100 the camera locked up with err99. I powered down and up and carried on for another 50 shots before removing the lens. I am beginning to suspect it's something to do with light levels.


Rhys

The empire conquers yet more galaxies:
www.sageworld.co.uk (external link)
www.sageworld.org (external link)
www.sagephotoworld.com (external link)
Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/t​hunderintheheavens (external link)

Free cheese comes only in mousetraps

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
guitarman3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,052 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
     
Dec 04, 2006 17:08 as a reply to  @ rhys's post |  #12

I took some photos of the moon last night with the Bigma and thought something was strange when the image on the lcd screen after I took the shot appeared sooo blurry---nothing like I was seeing in the viewfinder.

I went inside and tried turning off the XT. It wouldn't turn off and pretty soon err99 started blinking. I took the batteries out and put them back in. I also took the lens off and put it back on.

I went back outside to try shooting the moon again and now I was getting much sharper images. The manual mentions that it sometimes is caused by using non-Canon lenses. This is the first time I've gotten the err99 in almost 2 years of use.


Dennis
40D and grip, black XT, EF 17-40L, EF 50mm 1.8 II, Canon 100-400L, Canon 1.4X, Sigma 1.4x TC, Canon 580EX, Canon RC-1 Remote, Stofen Omni Bounce, Manfrotto 681B w/ 486RC; 3021BPro w/ 488RC
http://dsdphotos.zenfo​lio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 04, 2006 17:12 |  #13

Ya same here, its been about 1.5 years since I got my 20D... never got an err99 till now. Hopefully I dont see any more of it, not very comforting.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4070
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 04, 2006 17:32 |  #14

rhys wrote in post #2352722 (external link)
Err99 on my XT (and I presume it's similar on other models) is pretty meaningless. ...

Well, meaningless is not quite the right term. It means a lot, it's just that it means so much that one can not simply diagnose what it means. It can be something as simple as the lens not making good electrical contact, or it can mean you have a serious mechanical failure with the aperture mechanism, or it can mean that there is some electrical problem in the body of the camera.

I had 4 separate ERR99 causes on my then brand new XT. It took 3 months working with Canon service to fix them all. It also took some intuiting, that is looking for some other symptom such as one lens started over exposing shots getting more and more overexposed, then it eventually ERR-99ed. Removing the lens and jiggling it solved the issue. When Canon got this info, they were able to replace the mechanism and I have not had a ERR-99 on that lens in since.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,400 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
What does Error99 mean?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1961 guests, 100 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.