Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 05 Dec 2006 (Tuesday) 10:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Investment choices, upgrade camera or lenses?

 
LoriKelso
Senior Member
Avatar
261 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Houston
     
Dec 05, 2006 10:42 |  #1

I'm clueless as to which would be the better investment.

Current equipment:

350D
Kit lens (in my case, total garbage)

70-300mm f/4.9-5.6 IS USM (which I *just* found out last night falls into the "third number in serial number 0 or 1" category, so it will be sent for repair

nifty fifty ( LOVE that little cheapie)

Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX Aspherical (Would like to sell)

Sigma 70-300 mm ( Bought that one the day I bought the camera. Still like it for Macro)

I would love to get the 5D, but (of course) I also want some premium lenses. I enjoy taking people photos and landscape, and would love to move on to portraiture.

Any help and just personal opinions appreciated.


Canon 5D, 85 1.2. 50 1.2 on it's way, 24-105, 70-200 2.8 IS

http://www.kelsophotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Dec 05, 2006 10:47 as a reply to  @ post 2356998 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Lenses first, bodies are always poor investment.


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LoriKelso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
261 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Houston
     
Dec 05, 2006 10:48 as a reply to  @ post 2356998 |  #3

Sorry for the double post. Is there any way to delete one?


Canon 5D, 85 1.2. 50 1.2 on it's way, 24-105, 70-200 2.8 IS

http://www.kelsophotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Dec 05, 2006 10:50 |  #4

Unless there is a specific feature that you need, which the XT doesn't have, I'd go for better glass. Bodies come and go, but a good lens is a long term investment. You have a good lens in your Canon 70-300, perhaps get rid of the 7-3 Sigma and replace it with a true macro? You're also kinda lacking for a good walkabout lens, lots of good options on that one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sm1rf
Senior Member
Avatar
940 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England
     
Dec 05, 2006 10:55 as a reply to  @ post 2356998 |  #5

whats your budget?


"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not purchase"

My Gear
http://underwoodphotog​raphic.zenfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
Dec 05, 2006 10:56 as a reply to  @ post 2356998 |  #6

Welcometo POTN Lori.....its a mistake to think of photography equipment as an investment (financially) as virtually all equipment depreciates, bodies and lower qualitity lenses very quickly with high quality lenses depreciating the slowest. So buy the best quality you can afford, take lots of shots and enjoy this great hobby for many years.


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LoriKelso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
261 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Houston
     
Dec 05, 2006 11:12 |  #7

sm1rf wrote in post #2357045 (external link)
whats your budget?

Budget would top out around $5000. Anything more than that and I'd have to get a D-I-V-O-R-C-E!


Canon 5D, 85 1.2. 50 1.2 on it's way, 24-105, 70-200 2.8 IS

http://www.kelsophotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LoriKelso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
261 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Houston
     
Dec 05, 2006 11:14 |  #8

crn3371 wrote in post #2357022 (external link)
Unless there is a specific feature that you need, which the XT doesn't have, I'd go for better glass. Bodies come and go, but a good lens is a long term investment. You have a good lens in your Canon 70-300, perhaps get rid of the 7-3 Sigma and replace it with a true macro? You're also kinda lacking for a good walkabout lens, lots of good options on that one.

Any personal favorites you'd choose to recommend?


Canon 5D, 85 1.2. 50 1.2 on it's way, 24-105, 70-200 2.8 IS

http://www.kelsophotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Dec 05, 2006 11:38 |  #9

5K is a pretty healthy budget. Based on your shooting desires...I would snag a 5D, 24-70 430EX combo first...sell off the rest of your old gear and then grab a 70-200.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimlp
Senior Member
594 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Winchester, Mass
     
Dec 05, 2006 11:41 |  #10

LoriKelso wrote in post #2357121 (external link)
Budget would top out around $5000. Anything more than that and I'd have to get a D-I-V-O-R-C-E!

If you are planning on selling the equipment you have now, with an existing budget of $5000.00 plus the money from the sale plus rebates you could feasibly go with a 5D plus L glass from 24mm to 300mm. Do you shoot subjects that require longer focal lengths or more towards the shorter focal lengths? With that much cash available it is easy to buy stuff you want but don't need, trust me I know!


Canon 1DsMk2, EOS RP, Canon 17-40 f4L, 24-105 f4.0L ll, Canon 70-300 f5.6L IS , Sigma 85mm f1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sm1rf
Senior Member
Avatar
940 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England
     
Dec 05, 2006 11:46 |  #11

LoriKelso wrote in post #2357121 (external link)
Budget would top out around $5000. Anything more than that and I'd have to get a D-I-V-O-R-C-E!

That should buy some good gear, like other posters have said, get the best glass you can afford,

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 (external link),
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L, / (external link)[URL="http://[URL]www.​onestop-digital.com/catalog/pr​oduct_info.php?cPath=2​4_26&products_id=36"] Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L [URL="http://[URL]www.​onestop-digital.com/catalog/pr​oduct_info.php?cPath=2​4_26&products_id=94"]C​anon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L, (external link)
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS (external link),
they would be a good start or the Sigma/Tamron equivalents for less money, L glass can't be beat i believe for build quality.
A combination of the above and a 30D would be my personal choice purely on a faster frame rate basis.


"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not purchase"

My Gear
http://underwoodphotog​raphic.zenfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pieq314
Goldmember
1,102 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
Dec 05, 2006 11:49 |  #12

LoriKelso wrote in post #2357121 (external link)
Budget would top out around $5000. Anything more than that and I'd have to get a D-I-V-O-R-C-E!

Your current camera is more than good enough. A better camera will not make a noticeable difference.

You should probably get Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L and 70-200mm f/2.8L IS first (about $2500-$2800). Then, get some flash/strobe lights for portraiture (from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars). And a tripod, a few memory cards. If there is money left, get a computer with large RAM and fast harddisk drive, and Photoshop CS2.


Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thedoc
Member
107 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Dec 05, 2006 11:56 |  #13

Go for good glass.Glass is always a better investment.A 70-200 f2.8 IS,a 17-40 or a 300 f2.8 IS...or ALL othem.


Canon 400D+Grip,Canon 50mm MkII f1.8,Canon 17-40mm f4L,Canon 70-200mm f4L.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LoriKelso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
261 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Houston
     
Dec 05, 2006 12:05 |  #14

jimlp wrote in post #2357212 (external link)
If you are planning on selling the equipment you have now, with an existing budget of $5000.00 plus the money from the sale plus rebates you could feasibly go with a 5D plus L glass from 24mm to 300mm. Do you shoot subjects that require longer focal lengths or more towards the shorter focal lengths? With that much cash available it is easy to buy stuff you want but don't need, trust me I know!

I prefer to shoot subjects that require shorter focal lengths. I seem to get my best results shooting people. The whole buying stuff I want but don't need is the thing I'm trying to avoid, :lol: .


Canon 5D, 85 1.2. 50 1.2 on it's way, 24-105, 70-200 2.8 IS

http://www.kelsophotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nycgrip
Member
88 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: NYC, NY
     
Dec 05, 2006 12:06 as a reply to  @ thedoc's post |  #15

i would do a 5d, and a 24-105L f4 is, get the double rebate which is 600 off 5d and 90-100 for lens. buy off amazon for no tax and if ur prime member free shipping.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,976 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Investment choices, upgrade camera or lenses?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1966 guests, 100 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.