Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Dec 2006 (Wednesday) 08:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Edmontonion needs expert opinion on XTi

 
blam
Goldmember
1,900 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN
     
Dec 06, 2006 08:39 |  #1

Hey guys,

I had recently shipped my XTi to Canon to check out a backfocus issue I had with the body and they shipped it back (after 4 weeks) to tell me nothing is wrong.

I pretty much can't shoot with any aperture wider than 4 without noticing backfocus.

Is there any local repair shop that will give me a 2nd opinion? I don't want to ship it out to Canon Ontario(sent to calgary the first time) and shell out another 60$ to do so. Or perhaps a local shooter here on the forum that can take a few shots and give me their thoughts?

The only other thing I can think of is to go about my shooting and saving all the pictures to a CD and sending the CD to Canon for their thoughts before sending the camera in again.

I will post some pictures when i get home.

THe only other thing I can think of is I am a total n00b and don't know how to use AF.

From what I understand, the AF needs contrast in order to focus properly

one of the tests I did was as follows

_______________ background (was black)

O O 2 white batteries

O 1 random battery I found (energizer)

the camera backfocussed off the energizer onto the 2 white batteries.

I realized this morning the energizer and background was fairly similar in color and maybe the camera picked out the white batteries because they contrasted heavily with the rest of the scene.

I also did some tests with paper with text on it on a tripid with mirror lock and a remote, which turned out to be quite a bit more accurate.

thanks for bearing with me, I am just really furstrated!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Dec 06, 2006 08:43 |  #2

could it be that it might be the lens and not the body that's back focussing?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,900 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN
     
Dec 06, 2006 08:48 |  #3

I thought that was the issue, but this is my 2nd copy of the 50mm F1.4 and my 50mm 1.8 SEVERLY backfocussed when I had it.

I've also seen it on the kit lens, although it hasnt seen much use.

the BF is most prevalent on wider apertures. 2.8 and lower. generally speaking.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4071
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 06, 2006 09:10 |  #4

blam wrote in post #2361325 (external link)
....
The only other thing I can think of is to go about my shooting and saving all the pictures to a CD and sending the CD to Canon for their thoughts before sending the camera in again.....

When I was debugging an over exposure problem with Canon, The second time I sent in a CD with 6 example pix. When I did so, it prompted a call with a tech and I got to talk to a real person I was able to clearly explain the problem to the tech. It got resolved. Sometimes a pic is worth a 1000 words as the saying goes.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Dec 06, 2006 09:14 |  #5

i dont think you ever mentioned which focus point you used. im assuming center focus point?, no?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,900 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN
     
Dec 06, 2006 10:09 |  #6

I used the centre focus point

gjl711 wrote in post #2361425 (external link)
When I was debugging an over exposure problem with Canon, The second time I sent in a CD with 6 example pix. When I did so, it prompted a call with a tech and I got to talk to a real person I was able to clearly explain the problem to the tech. It got resolved. Sometimes a pic is worth a 1000 words as the saying goes.

I think I will try that....take a lot of photos (real life) and preserve the EXIF and AF point data and put them on a CD and send the CD out to Canon in Ontario this time and wait for them to call me. I don't want my camera being sent out again for nothing.

I've heard better things about them over the Calgary location.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4071
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 06, 2006 10:27 |  #7

blam wrote in post #2361601 (external link)
I used the centre focus point


I think I will try that....take a lot of photos (real life) and preserve the EXIF and AF point data and put them on a CD and send the CD out to Canon in Ontario this time and wait for them to call me. I don't want my camera being sent out again for nothing.

I've heard better things about them over the Calgary location.

I don't think that they will do anything with the pics by themselves unless they have a RMA and the hardware as well. I worked with Canon service and when asked to send in my lens, I also supplied the data clearly showing the issue. I think that's what prompted the call. After talking to the guy for about 10 minutes or so I was able to clearly explain that my problem happened once every 20/30 pics so a quick plug into their test bench might not show the problem but after shooting for a while it would crop up. They were then able to determine that the aperture mechanism was in the process of failing and they replaced the unit. It has worked flawlessly since. So call service, explain the issue, they will issue the RMA and send in pics clearly showing the problem. Might even take a screen shot which shows the focus point selected and the focus being elsewhere.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,900 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN
     
Dec 06, 2006 10:32 |  #8

RMA?

the Calgary location wasn't a very good experience to start with...

2 weeks for them to even open my package, and another 2 to tell me there was nothing wrong. never got any phone calls or anything from them to let me know they received it, looked at it, found nothing or even that they shipped it out.

at least if I send the CD in before hadn with the focus points (in a screen shot) they will see that the focus is off. I don't think I should be paying the hefty shipping fee to get the package to them either. (55$ to ship and insure) I already paid it once and I do not want to pay it again for something that should have been fixed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4071
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 06, 2006 11:14 |  #9

blam wrote in post #2361681 (external link)
RMA?

the Calgary location wasn't a very good experience to start with...

2 weeks for them to even open my package, and another 2 to tell me there was nothing wrong. never got any phone calls or anything from them to let me know they received it, looked at it, found nothing or even that they shipped it out.

at least if I send the CD in before hadn with the focus points (in a screen shot) they will see that the focus is off. I don't think I should be paying the hefty shipping fee to get the package to them either. (55$ to ship and insure) I already paid it once and I do not want to pay it again for something that should have been fixed.

Hmmm... When I sent in my lens the second and third times, Canon sent me the shipping label. Maybe if you let them know that this was not fixed and try the other location. 4 weeks sounds quite excessive though.
EDIT::Whoops RMA = returen material autherization. Its the sheet they send you when you call that you fill out and send back.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Dec 06, 2006 11:26 |  #10

have you also tried manually focusing? and when you do, does it give you the confirmation beep at the correct focus? if so, then its definitely an AF problem. your camera needs to be recalibrated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,900 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN
     
Dec 06, 2006 11:26 |  #11

ahhh.

I will keep the shipping slip in mind. I am definatly not shelling out another penny to ship this for warrenty work

thanks for the help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,900 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN
     
Dec 06, 2006 11:27 |  #12

roeddel wrote in post #2361877 (external link)
have you also tried manually focusing? and when you do, does it give you the confirmation beep at the correct focus? if so, then its definitely an AF problem. your camera needs to be recalibrated.

can you tell me how this is done?

I know with my 50mm F1.4 I can manual focus after I autofocus.

I dont know anything about this beep you speak of though




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Dec 06, 2006 13:14 |  #13

set your lens to MF, find a good contrasty subject -- preferrably something that has a line -- then half press the shutter release button and manually focus. your camera WILL beep when it finds absolute focus. you may have to go back and forth on the subject until you hear the confirmation beep. you will also see the center focus point blink red when it finds absolute focus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4071
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 06, 2006 13:26 |  #14

You might want to also set it so that only the center focus point is used as well. This will eliminate any shenanigans from the camera trying to pick the best point.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,900 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN
     
Dec 06, 2006 14:11 |  #15

roeddel wrote in post #2362350 (external link)
set your lens to MF, find a good contrasty subject -- preferrably something that has a line -- then half press the shutter release button and manually focus. your camera WILL beep when it finds absolute focus. you may have to go back and forth on the subject until you hear the confirmation beep. you will also see the center focus point blink red when it finds absolute focus.

Thanks I will give that a try and report back!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,871 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Edmontonion needs expert opinion on XTi
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2451 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.