Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 06 Dec 2006 (Wednesday) 14:55
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Will it be a good starter kit?"
Yes.
8
61.5%
No.
1
7.7%
Don't know.
4
30.8%

13 voters, 13 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Would this be a good setup of lenses for someone w/o the €€€ to buy L-glass?

 
BrewsterPilot
Senior Member
484 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Dec 06, 2006 14:55 |  #1

Last thread, I promise...:o
So, I'll be buying the 400D, and have been planning back and forth what lenses to purchase. I want an ultra-wide, a macro, a general purpose and a tele lens.

What about this list?
Tokina AF 12-24mm f/4 AT-X Pro DX
Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD
Tokina AT-X 100mm f/2.8 PRO D Macro

Tokina AT-X 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 AF D

All of these lenses have a reputation of a quite high optical quality, and the build quality is impeccable (but the Tamron, which has a very good IQ to compensate for it). Their main downsides would be lack of USM (doesn't matter to me) and no IS on the 80-400mm, which again, doesn't matter much to me. And of course they don't have that cosmetic red ring...:lol:
For the price, I'd say it's a quite good starter kit.
Your thoughts please!

Sincerely Yours,
BrewsterPilot




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MinisterStanley
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Dec 06, 2006 15:05 |  #2

I see good rating on all of these lenses. If they suit your style of shooting and your budget, then they are all good choices.


-Prodigal Son

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
illy
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: London
     
Dec 06, 2006 15:12 |  #3

How about Tokina 12-24, Tamron 17-50, Canon 60mm Macro, Sigma 70-200mm ?


Flickr (external link)
600D, 17-50, 50, 60, 100, 70-200, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrewsterPilot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
484 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Dec 06, 2006 15:33 |  #4

MinisterStanley wrote in post #2362881 (external link)
I see good rating on all of these lenses. If they suit your style of shooting and your budget, then they are all good choices.

Great, thanks!:D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrewsterPilot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
484 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Dec 06, 2006 15:35 |  #5

illy wrote in post #2362910 (external link)
How about Tokina 12-24, Tamron 17-50, Canon 60mm Macro, Sigma 70-200mm ?


Otherwise would be OK, but the working distance of the 60mm macro isn't quite enough IMO, the 200mm max. focal length range of the Sigma is a bit short for me, and I just can't stand the AF sound on the Tammie 17-50.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aidenswarrior
Senior Member
Avatar
535 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Gahanna, Ohio
     
Dec 06, 2006 15:36 |  #6

illy wrote in post #2362910 (external link)
How about Tokina 12-24, Tamron 17-50, Canon 60mm Macro, Sigma 70-200mm ?

I would go for the Tokina 12-24, Tamron 17-50, Canon 100mm Macro, Canon 70-200 (F4/F2.8 nonis/is)


7D
Canon 50 F1.4
Canon 18-135
Tokina 11-16
Canon 70-200 F4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Dec 06, 2006 15:38 |  #7

I think your choices will be just fine for a nice limited budget setup.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrewsterPilot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
484 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Dec 07, 2006 08:59 |  #8

Woolburr wrote in post #2363026 (external link)
I think your choices will be just fine for a nice limited budget setup.

Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrewsterPilot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
484 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Dec 07, 2006 09:00 |  #9

Aidenswarrior wrote in post #2363021 (external link)
I would go for the Tokina 12-24, Tamron 17-50, Canon 100mm Macro, Canon 70-200 (F4/F2.8 nonis/is)

Tammie 17-50, cant stand noise
Canon 100mm Macro, pricey
Canon 70-200, not long enough




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Dec 07, 2006 09:07 as a reply to  @ BrewsterPilot's post |  #10

looks good to me..as long as you go for the new ATX-D 80-400


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Dec 07, 2006 09:11 |  #11

a thumbs-up for the Toki 12-24 f4. i have that lens and its a great piece of glass!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Dec 07, 2006 09:12 |  #12

the main question is, why would you need all of this? do you know you need each and every lens there, or just collecting them for fun? unless you do wildlife, 70-200 is more than enough range. if you do wildlife, look at a lens that's at least 400mm, anything shorter will mean cropping unless you shoot elephants from 20 feet away... for your price range, the only true 1:1 macro with consistant reviews is the ef-s 60mm MACRO, if you aren't ready for 1:1, get a closeup filter set like the 500d.

the key is to buy as little as possible at first, then work your way from there. first you need to know what you WILL be shooting before you can actually do it (and get the lenses for it)


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,154 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: to
     
Dec 07, 2006 09:33 |  #13

Yeah, it's a hell of a big kit to start out with. I'd play with the kit lens for several months first.

However, that wasn't the question. In this case, it seems like a good kit (note I didn't say starter... but to work towards). I'd invest in a GOOD tripod and monopod (especially for that 80-400)


Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrewsterPilot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
484 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Dec 07, 2006 09:34 |  #14

05Xrunner wrote in post #2366272 (external link)
looks good to me..as long as you go for the new ATX-D 80-400

Of course!:)
Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrewsterPilot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
484 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Dec 07, 2006 09:36 |  #15

roeddel wrote in post #2366287 (external link)
a thumbs-up for the Toki 12-24 f4. i have that lens and its a great piece of glass!!

Yeah, heard many good things about it. Feels solid as h*ll!:D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,254 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Would this be a good setup of lenses for someone w/o the €€€ to buy L-glass?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1820 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.