Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Dec 2006 (Wednesday) 15:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Welding Torch

 
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Dec 06, 2006 19:22 |  #16

DrPablo wrote in post #2363813 (external link)
About 99% of UV rays are blocked by the coatings on your lens elements. If you're using an SLR, i.e. what your eye sees is what the lens sees, then there is no risk of UV rays passing through the lens, bouncing off the reflex mirror, and hitting your retina in any meaningful amount. The brightness alone, however, can damage your retina irrespective of UV transmission.

Incidentally, there is a reason why on CSI they use Nikons to take pictures of crime scenes. The reason is that Nikon (but not Canon) makes an SLR lens that transmits UV rays, which is useful for forensic pathologists to take pictures of subcutaneous bruising. This lens can do some amazing things when used with a filter that transmits UV but blocks visible light (i.e. the exact opposite of the typical UV filter)... see this gallery: http://www.naturfotogr​af.com/uvstart.html (external link).

Unfortunately the lens costs $3000 -- otherwise I'd gladly adapt one to my own camera.

And Fuji which use Nikon lenses just released S3UVID body for forensic science.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Dec 06, 2006 19:25 |  #17

You can always use an autodarkening shield to look thru the VF. I personally use the autodarkening shield when I weld. For the short period of time that I weld and the infequent times that I weld it comes in handy. Espencially important for those who don't weld autodarkening will definitely help save your eyes when unexpectantly the welder strikes an arc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagentaJoe
psycho clown
Avatar
1,357 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Having breakfast at the circus, with the lions and the clowns.
     
Dec 06, 2006 20:23 |  #18

All lenses are not created equal nor are all coatings. Relying on the assumption that your lens has a coating which will block UV, I think, is dangerous.

Different coatings will block differing wavelengths of UV. The coatings on most lenses do block UV but are meant for the relatively small amount of UV light that is scattered about at sea level. This is to prevent your pictures from appearing "cold" i.e. a blue colour cast to them.

Even filters specifically designed to block UV (350nm-400nm) do a widely varying job.

How well does the retina heal after being burned?


Arguing with a psycho clown can be harmful to your funny bone.
5D-Grip, 40D, 35f2, 50f1.4, 85f1.8,100f2.8macro, 135f2.8sf, 17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8L, 100-400f4.5-5.6isL, 580ex, 420ex, 430ex, 430ez
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=442750

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Dec 06, 2006 20:43 |  #19

I think what the Doc is prescribing is base on the fact that the uv ray will pass thru several layers of glass and reflected by a semi transparent mirror onto a prism/mirror to another mirror and then thru glass will greatly reduce the amount of uv to your eyes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Dec 06, 2006 21:17 |  #20

MagentaJoe wrote in post #2364160 (external link)
All lenses are not created equal nor are all coatings. Relying on the assumption that your lens has a coating which will block UV, I think, is dangerous.

Different coatings will block differing wavelengths of UV. The coatings on most lenses do block UV but are meant for the relatively small amount of UV light that is scattered about at sea level. This is to prevent your pictures from appearing "cold" i.e. a blue colour cast to them.

Even filters specifically designed to block UV (350nm-400nm) do a widely varying job.

How well does the retina heal after being burned?

Point taken. I'm not an ophthalmologist, so I won't pretend to be an authority on this. But to the extent I know the subject, retinal burns are not caused by UV rays, but rather intense visible light. UV light and other forms of high energy radiation are mainly associated with cataracts.

I wasn't encouraging people to look at welding torches through their lens. Just saying that the rationale not to is not UV transmission, but rather the brightness intensity.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagentaJoe
psycho clown
Avatar
1,357 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Having breakfast at the circus, with the lions and the clowns.
     
Dec 06, 2006 23:33 |  #21

Whatever way you want to look at it, without being certain you have proper protection, it is foolhardy to look at a welding arc through the viewfinder.

I have suffered arc eye before and don't want anyone to go through that, it is terrible.


Arguing with a psycho clown can be harmful to your funny bone.
5D-Grip, 40D, 35f2, 50f1.4, 85f1.8,100f2.8macro, 135f2.8sf, 17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8L, 100-400f4.5-5.6isL, 580ex, 420ex, 430ex, 430ez
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=442750

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagentaJoe
psycho clown
Avatar
1,357 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Having breakfast at the circus, with the lions and the clowns.
     
Dec 06, 2006 23:49 |  #22

I was told by my family doctor many years ago, that the welder's flash I was experiencing was because my retina had been burned by the UV in the welders arc. Either he was wrong or I heard him incorrectly! Every reputable source I can find says something along these lines...

"Definition of Photokeratitis

Photokeratitis: A burn of the cornea (the clear front surface of the eye) by ultraviolet B rays (UVB). Also called radiation keratitis or snowblindness.

The condition typically occurs at high altitudes on highly reflective snow fields or, less often, with a solar eclipse. Artificial sources of UVB can also cause snowblindness. These sources include suntanning beds, a welder's arc (flash burn, welder's flash, or arc eye), carbon arcs, photographic flood lamps, lightning, electric sparks, and halogen desk lamps.

Symptoms include tearing, pain, redness, swollen eyelids, headache, a gritty feeling in the eyes, halos around lights, hazy vision, and temporary loss of vision. These symptoms may not appear until 6-12 hours after the UBV exposure.

Treatment consists mainly of keeping the eye closed with patches, after instilling a few drops of ophthalmic antibiotic solution, such as sulfacetamide sodium 10% with methylcellulose or gentamicin. Vision usually returns after 18 hours. The surface of the cornea usually regenerates in 24 to 48 hours.

Prevention involves sunglasses with adequate UVB protection and full coverage of the eyes (side shields)."

and another source...

"NTENSE VISIBLE LIGHT
Exposure of the human eye to intense visible light can produce adaptation, pupillary reflex, and shading of the eyes. Such actions are protective mechanisms to prevent excessive light from being focused on the retina. In the arc welding process, eye exposure to intense visible light is prevented for the most part by the welder's helmet. However, some individuals have
sustained retinal damage due to careless "viewing" of the arc. At no time should the arc be observed without eye protection"

So it appears that CORNEAL damage is from UVB and RETINAL damage is from VISIBLE.

I have seen this same question come up a number of times but only this time have I spent some time researching the actual facts beyond what I thought I knew.


Arguing with a psycho clown can be harmful to your funny bone.
5D-Grip, 40D, 35f2, 50f1.4, 85f1.8,100f2.8macro, 135f2.8sf, 17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8L, 100-400f4.5-5.6isL, 580ex, 420ex, 430ex, 430ez
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=442750

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Dec 07, 2006 09:52 |  #23

MagentaJoe wrote in post #2364939 (external link)
I
So it appears that CORNEAL damage is from UVB and RETINAL damage is from VISIBLE.

I have seen this same question come up a number of times but only this time have I spent some time researching the actual facts beyond what I thought I knew.

UVB can cause lens damage as well (cataracts), which of course is behind the cornea. The cornea, being where it is, is exposed to all the particulates from welding as well.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vwown3d
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: USA
     
Dec 07, 2006 11:30 |  #24

i was doing some unmasked welding one day, at night bright lights were looking blury to me and out of focus. when i woke up i could barely see. some type of temporary cataracts. really freaked me out. took a day before I was seeing right.

morale: wear eye protection!


30D + BG-E2 l 18-55 l 17-40 f/4L l 50 f/1.4
60 f/2.8 Macro
430ex l 9GB's of ultra II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Dec 07, 2006 21:46 |  #25

Ah you're one of those that do the turn head method of welding...

Yeah one of my manager tried to demonstrate that method to me but I just turn around and walk out while was demoing. He walked out of the welding shop like a blind mice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlefield
Goldmember
Avatar
2,063 posts
Gallery: 465 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11248
Joined Jan 2006
Location: SC, USA
     
Dec 08, 2006 01:19 |  #26

I would have walked out too .Your eye site is precious and some risk it to try to get some pics of sun too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,027 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Welding Torch
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2568 guests, 94 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.