Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 Dec 2006 (Thursday) 01:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CCD image sensor vs CMOS sensor

 
RLipp69
Senior Member
589 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 11
Joined May 2006
     
Dec 07, 2006 01:57 |  #1

i noticed on the canon camera has cmos platform and the nikon has the ccd platform.is there any disadvantage or advantage on have the cmos sensor.or is the ccd sensor better the the cmos.:rolleyes:


Canon 5DMKIII, 40D,EF 70-200 F/2.8L IS II,24-70 F/2.8L,35mmF/1.4[COLOR=red]L, EFS-580EXll.Pcket wizzard mini & Flex,Bees and beauty dish

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Dec 07, 2006 02:09 |  #2

Its about cost of manufacture and power consumption. Have you seen a full frame digital (35mm) slr w/ ccd yet. Nikon's D2X is a CMOS sensor. All Canon's DSLR are CMOS.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Dec 07, 2006 02:13 |  #3

lostdoggy wrote in post #2365368 (external link)
Its about cost of manufacture and power consumption. Have you seen a full frame digital (35mm) slr w/ ccd yet. Nikon's D2X is a CMOS sensor. All Canon's DSLR are CMOS.

Not exactly true...the 1D is a CCD.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Dec 07, 2006 02:14 |  #4

Woolburr wrote in post #2365379 (external link)
Not exactly true...the 1D is a CCD.

That's why pictures out of camera are so awesome without processing, but then it sucks in high ISO's.


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Dec 07, 2006 02:17 |  #5

Woolburr wrote in post #2365379 (external link)
Not exactly true...the 1D is a CCD.

Ok all Canon DSLR that is still in production are CMOS.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Dec 07, 2006 02:20 |  #6

Well if we really want to be picky so is DCS1&3 and D2000 &D6000




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cool_dude07
Senior Member
Avatar
457 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kelowna, BC
     
Dec 07, 2006 02:40 |  #7

I guess maybe we're getting off topic here...I think the op (nd I) would like to know some of the technical advantages instead of which cameras they're used in..

Ty


EOS 10D + GRIP | EF 50mm 1.8 | EF 75-300mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prep
Member
245 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Perth WA
     
Dec 07, 2006 05:21 |  #8

The CMOS chip has 2 mongo advantages. 1) You can Fab them on an old memory of logic line. 2) Point defects are less likley to wipe out a full colum or the chip.

Against, is that every pixel has its own noise, bias and gain that you need to calibrate for. The other problem is reset noise, but Canon have that one pretty well licked.

CCDs are quite flexible in how they are operated, and can be extremly acurate and stable. If you want high speed and high acuracy, that can cost in power, plus the clocking of the 3 phase clock arrays is a power pig. But it is a trade off by the designer. The Australia Telescope CCD package runs on under 1W. The CHFT in its original form sank about 1KW into the CCD package.

If you have a semi fab in place, 1 kills the rest stone cold dead. It means that you get you chips for less than free, as you can continue using the fab and don't have to spend many millions pulling it apart and getting rid of it.


~pr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,179 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
CCD image sensor vs CMOS sensor
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2568 guests, 94 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.