Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 07 Dec 2006 (Thursday) 13:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM

 
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Jul 15, 2013 18:41 |  #226

Actor...
As long as the V.I you got has the metal mount and is the 3.5-4.5 EF you'll not be disappointed...


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thorrulz
Goldmember
Avatar
3,818 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 469
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Jul 15, 2013 20:26 |  #227

actorlife wrote in post #16116823 (external link)
Thorrulz you have any older shots with this lens? Does anyone use the lens hood with this lens? I bought it without one. If anything I' could get the china cheap import ones.

Here are a few taken with this little beauty.

IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2819/9297155548_9a6392dc23_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rickzphoto/9297​155548/  (external link)
_MG_7650 (external link) by RickZPhoto (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7418/9294357865_d4f4c451f5_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rickzphoto/9294​357865/  (external link)
_MG_7656_6x8 (external link) by RickZPhoto (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3715/9297181470_c5b264fd58_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rickzphoto/9297​181470/  (external link)
_MG_6647_8x6 (external link) by RickZPhoto (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2814/9297175546_441d7aaea3_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rickzphoto/9297​175546/  (external link)
_MG_6648_6x8 (external link) by RickZPhoto (external link), on Flickr

Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
actorlife
Senior Member
Avatar
509 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
     
Jul 15, 2013 20:40 |  #228

kitacanon wrote in post #16123362 (external link)
Actor...
As long as the V.I you got has the metal mount and is the 3.5-4.5 EF you'll not be disappointed...

Yes it is and MIJ too. :) Thanks.:cool: Dang I can't wait to get it.
Found this:
28-105mm 3.5-4.5 USM, “MACRO” icon.
This is the second version of the lens, though it was never officially identified as such - it’s still considered to be a mark I. It’s identical to the first version but it has the word MACRO printed on the lens barrel in lieu of the flower (closeup) icon. Internally, however, it has a 7-blade aperture diaphragm, which in theory offers slightly better bokeh, or out-of-focus blurring. Marked with a striped gold line since it’s a USM lens, and has a metal lens mount. Discontinued.

28-105mm 3.5-4.5 USM II.
This is the official second version of the lens, as indicated by the II symbol. According to Canon the original 28-105 and the mark II versions have identical optics, but the mark II version has slightly different external styling, including an allegedly slightly tougher design. According to Canon Malaysia an internal component used in the zoom mechanism has been updated to metal from plastic. Marked with a striped gold line since it’s a USM lens, and has a metal lens mount. Discontinued.

link to original article:http://photonotes.org …ner-faq/lenses.html#28105 (external link)

Sellers pics

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v125/ActorJLB/24-105a_zps98c2e87d.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://smg.photobucket​.com …105a_zps98c2e87​d.jpg.html  (external link)
IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v125/ActorJLB/24-105b_zps349304dc.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://smg.photobucket​.com …105b_zps349304d​c.jpg.html  (external link)
IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v125/ActorJLB/24-105c_zpse6ec7bc9.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://smg.photobucket​.com …105c_zpse6ec7bc​9.jpg.html  (external link)

Thorrulz wrote in post #16123603 (external link)
Here are a few taken with this little beauty.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rickzphoto/9297​181470/  (external link)

Thorrulz really great job on these, WOWEEE. My favorite is this one, so sharp.:eek: Thanks so much for posting.


Cameras: Fuji S3(SOLD)/Nikon D70s(SOLD)/:D1DM2!
Lens: Nikon/Zeiss/Canon 80-200 2.8L:D/17-40L(Sold to get 1D MK II:()/85 1.8/Sigma 30 1.4/Tamron 28-75 2.8:DDestroyed by Sandy.:cry:Except my Canon 7D/50 1.8/10-18 4.5/28-105mm 3.5/55-250mm f4/Tamron 70-300VC(lost)/MF Adaptall-2 SP 90mm 2.5(lost)/MF Vivitar Series 1 85mm 1.4(lost)/Sigma 30 1.4/18-270 3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macvisual
Goldmember
Avatar
1,692 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
     
Jul 15, 2013 21:41 |  #229

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3758/9269204540_3cd33e3010_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/95336112@N07/9​269204540/  (external link)
Summer (external link) by Peter McCullough Photography (external link), on Flickr

Summer

'Peter McCullough Photography'
Follow my flickr
http://flic.kr/ps/2sfe​3P (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Jul 17, 2013 12:42 |  #230

actorlife wrote in post #16123635 (external link)
Yes it is and MIJ too. :) Thanks.:cool: Dang I can't wait to get it.
Found this:
28-105mm 3.5-4.5 USM, “MACRO” icon.
This is the second version of the lens, though it was never officially identified as such - it’s still considered to be a mark I. It’s identical to the first version but it has the word MACRO printed on the lens barrel in lieu of the flower (closeup) icon. Internally, however, it has a 7-blade aperture diaphragm, which in theory offers slightly better bokeh, or out-of-focus blurring. Marked with a striped gold line since it’s a USM lens, and has a metal lens mount. Discontinued.

28-105mm 3.5-4.5 USM II.
This is the official second version of the lens, as indicated by the II symbol. According to Canon the original 28-105 and the mark II versions have identical optics, but the mark II version has slightly different external styling, including an allegedly slightly tougher design. According to Canon Malaysia an internal component used in the zoom mechanism has been updated to metal from plastic. Marked with a striped gold line since it’s a USM lens, and has a metal lens mount. Discontinued.

link to original article:http://photonotes.org …ner-faq/lenses.html#28105 (external link)

Well, as luck would have it I just found a MACRO version (not Mark II though), and look forward to taking it for a comparison test drive against the FLOWER version I've been using for the past 5+ years.

...at first look, I did notice that the zoom barrel's rubber ring is a bit wider on the MACRO version...

Stay tuned....


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
actorlife
Senior Member
Avatar
509 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
     
Jul 18, 2013 19:46 |  #231

kitacanon wrote in post #16128601 (external link)
Well, as luck would have it I just found a MACRO version (not Mark II though), and look forward to taking it for a comparison test drive against the FLOWER version I've been using for the past 5+ years.

...at first look, I did notice that the zoom barrel's rubber ring is a bit wider on the MACRO version...

Stay tuned....

Looking forward to it Kitacanon.:D:cool: Darn mine is not here yet. :(


Cameras: Fuji S3(SOLD)/Nikon D70s(SOLD)/:D1DM2!
Lens: Nikon/Zeiss/Canon 80-200 2.8L:D/17-40L(Sold to get 1D MK II:()/85 1.8/Sigma 30 1.4/Tamron 28-75 2.8:DDestroyed by Sandy.:cry:Except my Canon 7D/50 1.8/10-18 4.5/28-105mm 3.5/55-250mm f4/Tamron 70-300VC(lost)/MF Adaptall-2 SP 90mm 2.5(lost)/MF Vivitar Series 1 85mm 1.4(lost)/Sigma 30 1.4/18-270 3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Jul 22, 2013 22:36 |  #232

Here are a few shots taken today comparing the 5-leaf and 7-leaf aperture
5-leaf above 7-leaf
....more tomorrow...

a couple of 100% crops @ 5.6 to compare bokah

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img560/7170/xsgm.jpg

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img843/9200/ezw2.jpg

Full frame @ 5.6

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img109/9995/2whb.jpg

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img23/6222/h0lg.jpg

full-frame and 100% crops

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img842/1033/myat.jpg

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img832/2883/y5wf.jpg

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img18/8994/jkj9.jpg

My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
actorlife
Senior Member
Avatar
509 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
     
Jul 23, 2013 08:08 as a reply to  @ kitacanon's post |  #233

Looking good Kit.:D Is that the 5 blade only? That tree shot looks nice and sharp. I got mine on Friday! The weather has been very humid, so I have not the chance to use it yet. It's nice and tiny and light weight. The lens looks new. Hopefully I can get some shots this week. Come on people post more shots!:cool:


Cameras: Fuji S3(SOLD)/Nikon D70s(SOLD)/:D1DM2!
Lens: Nikon/Zeiss/Canon 80-200 2.8L:D/17-40L(Sold to get 1D MK II:()/85 1.8/Sigma 30 1.4/Tamron 28-75 2.8:DDestroyed by Sandy.:cry:Except my Canon 7D/50 1.8/10-18 4.5/28-105mm 3.5/55-250mm f4/Tamron 70-300VC(lost)/MF Adaptall-2 SP 90mm 2.5(lost)/MF Vivitar Series 1 85mm 1.4(lost)/Sigma 30 1.4/18-270 3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Jul 23, 2013 15:15 as a reply to  @ actorlife's post |  #234

Here are a few more shots taken comparing the 5-leaf and 7-leaf aperture
5-leaf above 7-leaf if you look carefully you can see the difference in bokeh especially in the 1st pair.

...again the 5-leaf is above the 7-leaf...you can tell by the pentagon bokeh vs the more circular out of focus dots of light

100% crop

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img5/8382/11iy.jpg

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img10/1/6hnm.jpg

100% crop

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img14/2320/xy0o.jpg

(DUPLICATE IMAGE)


Full Frame V.1 Flower

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img9/135/h0ud.jpg

Full Frame V.2 Macro

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img51/4227/84ri.jpg

100% crop of V.1

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img19/28/lpxs.jpg

100% crop of V.2

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img5/2065/msuh.jpg

My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Jul 23, 2013 20:41 |  #235

It's pretty obvious that the v.II has more circular out-of-focus points of light...but I think overall V.1 is a good performer, and at $75-100 less than V.2 it worked for me...though now that I have V.2, it'll work as well for the next shooter...


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
actorlife
Senior Member
Avatar
509 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
     
Jul 23, 2013 23:35 as a reply to  @ kitacanon's post |  #236

Like you said very little difference. Thanks for taking the time. Are you planning on keeping both?


Cameras: Fuji S3(SOLD)/Nikon D70s(SOLD)/:D1DM2!
Lens: Nikon/Zeiss/Canon 80-200 2.8L:D/17-40L(Sold to get 1D MK II:()/85 1.8/Sigma 30 1.4/Tamron 28-75 2.8:DDestroyed by Sandy.:cry:Except my Canon 7D/50 1.8/10-18 4.5/28-105mm 3.5/55-250mm f4/Tamron 70-300VC(lost)/MF Adaptall-2 SP 90mm 2.5(lost)/MF Vivitar Series 1 85mm 1.4(lost)/Sigma 30 1.4/18-270 3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Jul 24, 2013 00:30 |  #237

actorlife wrote in post #16148540 (external link)
Like you said very little difference. Thanks for taking the time. Are you planning on keeping both?

I'll admit that a quick look below at my sig reveals some lust for lenses...and that I do indeed have more than 1 in a focal length...two 50s and a 60mm, two 135s, and two 200mm lenses...
...and now that I have the 70-210/3.5 Vivitar that gives me two zooms in THAT range as well...but all the dupes are in fact "different" enough for me to justify having them, (e.g. the Canon zoom is AF, the Vivitar is that MF that I do love to do) ...some of those Nikkors are for that dark day when I get a Nikon Dslr bod...

...but I don't see any need to keep both 28-105s...V.1 has been good to me, and I'll be putting it on our classified forum so its next owner will enjoy it as much as I did...though in truth, I'll miss those pentagons I've become accustomed to all these 40 years (Nikkors are pentagon-producers too)...


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
actorlife
Senior Member
Avatar
509 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
     
Jul 25, 2013 21:58 as a reply to  @ kitacanon's post |  #238

Good deal. Glad you like the macro version. Pics coming soon.:cool:


Cameras: Fuji S3(SOLD)/Nikon D70s(SOLD)/:D1DM2!
Lens: Nikon/Zeiss/Canon 80-200 2.8L:D/17-40L(Sold to get 1D MK II:()/85 1.8/Sigma 30 1.4/Tamron 28-75 2.8:DDestroyed by Sandy.:cry:Except my Canon 7D/50 1.8/10-18 4.5/28-105mm 3.5/55-250mm f4/Tamron 70-300VC(lost)/MF Adaptall-2 SP 90mm 2.5(lost)/MF Vivitar Series 1 85mm 1.4(lost)/Sigma 30 1.4/18-270 3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Jul 26, 2013 07:08 |  #239

actorlife wrote in post #16154470 (external link)
Good deal. Glad you like the macro version. Pics coming soon.:cool:

Well, I wasn't looking for the MACRO, and if I hadn't found it I would have continued to use FLOWER version without worry or concern that I'd miss anything...
....because I shoot mostly at 1 F-stop down on most lenses (5.6 here) the bokeh difference, while noticeable, isn't that much to me...at least with regards to pentagon/circle...more a concern would have been "busy-doubling" of out of focus lines seen on some lenses, but not the 28-105...

Enjoy your lens....esp. with portraits.


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smooth906
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR, USA
     
Aug 01, 2013 14:55 |  #240

Thanks for the comparison pics. I have the flower version, and it's definitely a bit soft wide open, but relatively sharp stopped down slightly. The 5-blade bokeh doesn't really factor in for my purposes, so going to one of the newer versions probably isn't worth it for me.

I have been using it indoors w/flash as a "portrait zoom" when I need more reach than my Tamron 17-50, and it performs quite well in those situations. 28mm still gets you a usably wide FOV on crop, I don't miss IS too much since I am using flash, and the lens covers a very nice range when trying to shoot active kids. Of course I'd love the 24-105mm L IS but for a cheap alternative this lens works for this particular type of shooting.


Fujifilm X-T30 · XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 OIS · XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

171,936 views & 0 likes for this thread, 118 members have posted to it and it is followed by 10 members.
Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1036 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.