Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 07 Dec 2006 (Thursday) 15:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

In need of a good scanner.

 
august23
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Dec 07, 2006 15:23 |  #1

I must have thousands of 4x6 pictures from the 70's, 80's, 90's, etc. I want to digitalize them before they get too old, not to mention I enjoy looking at pictures on my computer than going through 400 albums.

I don't care if the scanner is noisy, expensive, slow, big....whatever. My only concern is to have a scanner that will make my 4x6's look exactly as they do on film, except on the computer. I need excellent resolution, clarity, etc. Everything else means nothing. But I don't know where to start looking! Help!:o



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 07, 2006 19:22 |  #2

Do you have the negatives? If so, using a film/slide scanner is a far superior way to digitize the images as compared to scanning prints.

My old Canon FS4000US film/slide scanner, for example, has a method of detecting and "removing" dust particles from the scan. Its resolution is good enough that I see the grain in the film when I use the maximum settings. I can usually see detail in the scans that cannot be seen in prints, even with high magnification.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Dec 07, 2006 19:30 |  #3

I just bought an Epson Perfection 4490. It's not very expensive, but it's very good.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Dec 07, 2006 22:41 as a reply to  @ SuzyView's post |  #4

I am also considering upgrading my visioneer scanner so that I can scan negatives. When you scan negatives with your epson, what size is the digital image? Also, is the quality good enough that you can edit the scanned image in PS?


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Dec 07, 2006 22:51 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

rent a high quality one, you'll spend less and get a better product. Our local shop rents it friday and it isn't due till monday and only charge $45. Just have all your stuff ready to go and make a weekend of it.

You really get what you pay for in scanners, and the good ones are really pricey.


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4070
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 07, 2006 23:20 |  #6

coreypolis wrote in post #2369606 (external link)
rent a high quality one, you'll spend less and get a better product. Our local shop rents it friday and it isn't due till monday and only charge $45. Just have all your stuff ready to go and make a weekend of it.

You really get what you pay for in scanners, and the good ones are really pricey.

What kind of scanner? And how fast does it scan? I have been doing this for over a year now and am finally getting to the newer pics for which I have negatives. I have been scanning the prints, 4 to 6 at a time depending on how many I can fit in the bed and a high quality scan takes about 10 to 15 minutes. Then post processing another 20-30 minutes for the batch or a throughput of about a picture every 7-10 minutes. Unless the scanner is real fast, one weekend isn't going to get them all.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Dec 07, 2006 23:43 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #7

unfortunately all the negatives are lost. i have all these photos in albums, none of which have any of the negatives. just a ship load of 4x6 prints! i dont mind spending a few extra pennies if it means high quality scans.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ V
Senior Member
Avatar
271 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Dec 08, 2006 23:16 |  #8

Epson V700


o o o o

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roli_bark
Senior Member
Avatar
918 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Dec 09, 2006 05:31 |  #9

Mike V wrote in post #2374642 (external link)
Epson V700

Why Espon v700, and not Epson v750 ? and, why not even Epson 4990, or 4490 ?
What about the time vested in Scanning / Post-Processing per PIC ?
Any clues on how to save the time spent per PIC ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4070
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 09, 2006 09:17 |  #10

roli_bark wrote in post #2375521 (external link)
...
What about the time vested in Scanning / Post-Processing per PIC ?
Any clues on how to save the time spent per PIC ?

I have found that if I group photos together of like color and contrast and surface material, I can scan a group together and that at least cuts down scanning time. But using the scanner software to make color/contrast changes just isn't as good as PS. Also, I probably scan at a much higher resolution than I need to and save all files in tif which leads to large files, but I want to do this once and who knows what the printer technology will be like in 5/10 years.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Dec 09, 2006 12:41 |  #11

thanks guys...i think its between the epson 4490 and the canon 9550. the canons another 100 bucks but with scanners u get the quality u pay for am i right?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ V
Senior Member
Avatar
271 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Dec 10, 2006 06:58 |  #12

roli_bark wrote in post #2375521 (external link)
Why Espon v700, and not Epson v750 ? and, why not even Epson 4990, or 4490 ?


They're all fairly similar actually. The film holders are better on the newer ones.

epson are releasing new models with Sony like regularity.


Get whatever model you can get a good deal on.


o o o o

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Dec 10, 2006 14:30 |  #13

ive heard problems of the epson 4490's glass "falling" due to cheaply made design. and on the other hand i havent heard anyone say anything about the canon 9950's photograph scan quality. when people say "slides" do they mean photographs? thats confusing me as well.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 11, 2006 01:36 |  #14

Im looking to get myself a V750 or an i900 or the new Microtek M1 when it comes out.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Dec 28, 2006 22:53 |  #15

ive narrowed it down to 3, which is best for 4x6's?

1.Canon Canoscan 9950f
2. Epson Perfection 4490
3. Epson v700



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,696 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
In need of a good scanner.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1759 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.