Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 08 Dec 2006 (Friday) 18:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Low Tide

 
viczig
Senior Member
657 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
     
Dec 08, 2006 18:30 |  #1

Taken at Clinton, CT. C&C welcomed and thanks for looking.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crazyea
Goldmember
1,135 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Dec 08, 2006 18:32 |  #2

I'm not an expert, but I would like to see more balance between the sky and shoreline. Maybe it would look better as a panoramic shot with more of the foreground cropped out?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viczig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
657 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
     
Dec 08, 2006 18:44 |  #3

crazyea wrote in post #2373403 (external link)
I'm not an expert, but I would like to see more balance between the sky and shoreline. Maybe it would look better as a panoramic shot with more of the foreground cropped out?

Elton,

Thanks for looking and for the comments. I struggled with this one as to where to crop it. I tried it cropping in the pool of water between the 2 strips of sand but I didn't like the way it looked so I left the bottom as shot and cropped most of the sky out above the line of clouds.

Vic




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rmodys
Senior Member
Avatar
320 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Cape Coral, FLA
     
Dec 08, 2006 19:12 |  #4

I like how you've got more foreground then backround, it makes for a great focus IMO.

It shows just the right amount of sky, the blue turning to pink and then the pink turning in to the horizon to the grey of the foreground. It represents the immense beauty of the sky and then the dull greyness of the low tide bottom. Maybe I'm just looking in to it too much..


EOS 40D, Sigma 10-20MM, Kit lens, Canon 55-200
http://robertmodys.smu​gmug.com/ (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rmodys/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asolie
Pigeon Queen
Avatar
4,941 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Locating customers for the Pigeon Cafe.
     
Dec 08, 2006 21:41 |  #5

Ooh, pretty sunset... :)


--ALyssa :cool:
Gear List ~ Blog (external link) ~ Smugmug (external link)
Photographs are records of life. Pity they don't make music when you put them in a record player. :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viczig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
657 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
     
Dec 09, 2006 07:26 as a reply to  @ asolie's post |  #6

Robert & Alyssa,

Thanks for looking and for the comments.

Vic




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Dec 09, 2006 08:08 |  #7

crazyea wrote in post #2373403 (external link)
I'm not an expert, but I would like to see more balance between the sky and shoreline. Maybe it would look better as a panoramic shot with more of the foreground cropped out?

I would agree that there is too much foreground and too little sky in the composition. The problem is that the way the foreground gradates to dark adds depth. That makes it hard to crop in that if up cropped from the bottom up too much, you would lose that effect. /Dan


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viczig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
657 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
     
Dec 09, 2006 08:54 |  #8

CannedHeat wrote in post #2375809 (external link)
I would agree that there is too much foreground and too little sky in the composition. The problem is that the way the foreground gradates to dark adds depth. That makes it hard to crop in that if up cropped from the bottom up too much, you would lose that effect. /Dan

I think you right on about minimizing cropping from the bottom because it adds depth to the picture, it didn't look right when I tried cropping the bottom it but maybe I went to far. The sky above the clouds was very plain so that's why it was cropped out.

BTW I liked your rural scenes in your gallery.

Vic




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,252 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Low Tide
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2924 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.