The page..it looks good. I really like all of the black and whites...
MauiKim Senior Member  717 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Maui, HI More info | Dec 09, 2006 14:22 | #16 The page..it looks good. I really like all of the black and whites... Kim A.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 09, 2006 19:26 | #17 thanks for all the comments - Joanna
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 10, 2006 01:05 | #18 I agree about the color and I"m not sure why - it doesn't seem very vibrant... I played with the color balance a little but it still doesn't pop as much as i'd like, any suggestions? - Joanna
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goforphoto Goldmember  2,067 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Virginia More info | Dec 10, 2006 01:11 | #19 If you shot these shots in RAW you can try correcting the Wb and then bumping the saturation to 1 or 2 in DPP Just another shutterbug.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
strmrdr Goldmember  1,853 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Dec 10, 2006 01:20 | #20 CyberPet wrote in post #2375572  In this above photo, the person in the background becomes more distracting in the color version than in the bw version, for instance. Thats what I was going to say and in the b/w one id consider fading the person in the back into the background more. .....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goforphoto Goldmember 2,067 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Virginia More info | Dec 10, 2006 01:34 | #21 When doing black and white conversions I find you get better contrast by converting to CYMK then desaturating, after that I reset the mode to RBG and play around with the channels some. Just another shutterbug.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pgb2ad54 Member 127 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Tulsa, OK More info | Dec 11, 2006 23:11 | #22 I would say b&w and maybe edit the person out of the background, but its not a necessery thing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ariane911 Member  123 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Southern California More info | Dec 11, 2006 23:16 | #23 B&W Canon 30d, Elan lle, 1N )
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonycortes Member 222 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: CA More info | Dec 12, 2006 11:06 | #24 islandphoto wrote in post #2375213 it's weird... the colors look WAY different now that they are sized for the web and posted hear. It's a lot warmer of a photo in reality. it's your color management. i'm guessing you are using Adobe RGB (a color space normally more warmer [red]) for the original.. convert the profile for any images going to web.. this way colors will be more similar
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 12, 2006 13:22 | #25 thanks... convert to what? - Joanna
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonycortes Member 222 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: CA More info | Dec 12, 2006 13:32 | #26 islandphoto wrote in post #2389830 thanks... convert to what? i can't remember, but the sRGB color space is more accurate for browsers, i think they actually use that. your colors will shift a bit but normally it will shift a lot less than leaving it in adobe rgb and viewing it in a browser
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim1960 Senior Member 689 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2006 Location: Hartwell, Georgia More info | Dec 12, 2006 15:56 | #27 I like the B&W. T. Gray
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sblais I am silly  3,532 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON (Canada, eh!) More info | Dec 12, 2006 16:10 | #28 B&W for me as well. Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1104 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
