Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 10 Dec 2006 (Sunday) 11:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

S2 noise at ISO200? / ZoomBrowser altering video quality?

 
2Shiny
Senior Member
Avatar
325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Stevens Point, WI
     
Dec 10, 2006 11:40 |  #1

I took my camera disc golfing yesterday and bumped the ISO to 200 on my S2 before we started playing. It was a bit dark in the woods, but we also had light snow cover. The combination of relatively high ISO, very bright AND very dark areas, and scene action really made it difficult to take pictures. I have not been impressed at all with the quality of the photos I got.

I also took a few movies, and rotated them when I got home, but ZoomBrowser seems to have altered the quality of the video?!?! I have the originals yet, but I don't understand why it would change anything but the rotation. The rotated movies look a lot noisier.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v627/White95Max/Nic3-R.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v627/White95Max/Shana_Jenny--R.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v627/White95Max/ShanaDisc---R.jpg

I'm happy with the moment captured with that last pic (disc about to hit the chains), but the overall picture quality is terrible. I tried fixing it up a bit, but with my limited talent in post processing, this is all I got.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v627/White95Max/ShanaDisc-R.jpg

I may just go over to that park in the next few days just to take a ton of pictures and find out what actually works. The bright snow, bright sky, and dark trees/ground were very difficult to work with. I was using evaluative metering, but I'm thinking I probably shouldn't have. Any tips that might help me next time I'm faced with this situation?

Paul
D20, SX40

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MingFromMongo
Member
Avatar
152 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 17
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Illinois
     
Dec 10, 2006 12:08 |  #2

It reminds me of a series of photos that I took that I had shot with the camera on tv and the white balance as tungsten. I took these in similar conditions with bright light and dark areas. The result was a bluish cast to everything similar to those you took.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joayne
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,385 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 3858
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Stuck @ Coachella
     
Dec 10, 2006 12:36 |  #3

This looks like a white balance problem rather than noise. ISO of 200 should not really produce any noticeable noise. Try changing your white balance settings with your processing software. Cycle through all of the choices in your software. If you use PS lookup setting the White Point and Black Point.


joayne Contribute to POTN | Worldwide Photo Week

Please Quote the post to which you are responding.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2Shiny
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Stevens Point, WI
     
Dec 10, 2006 12:42 |  #4

well I'll be damned....I checked the EXIF on a couple pics and it says White Balance - tungsten. I must have taken a quick glance at it and mistakenly saw the little light bulb icon as the daylight icon. :(
I really hate when a whole day's pics are messed up like this!


Paul
D20, SX40

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaxZoom
Senior Member
Avatar
316 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Dec 10, 2006 13:04 as a reply to  @ 2Shiny's post |  #5

In Photoshop VS2 try - "Image" - "Adjustments" - "Match Color" and select "Neutralize" and work from there. I'd post my attempt but you have image editing turned off in your profile.


Max :rolleyes:
There's no such thing as a bad photo, just the wrong audience.
EQUIPMENT: Canon Powershot S3 IS, 2x Transcend 2GB x150 SD, 2x 4GB Class 4 Dane-Elec SDHC, LensMate 52mm Adapter Tube and lots of stuff to hang on it.
A couple of flashes and a couple of strobes. My other camera is a Sony DSC-P200.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2Shiny
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Stevens Point, WI
     
Dec 10, 2006 17:00 |  #6

Feel free to take a shot at correcting it. I changed my image editing preference.


Paul
D20, SX40

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaxZoom
Senior Member
Avatar
316 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Dec 11, 2006 11:57 |  #7

2Shiny wrote in post #2381564 (external link)
Feel free to take a shot at correcting it. I changed my image editing preference.

I did as I suggested and also fiddled with R G & B levels clipping the snow slightly. I then applied a 1.0 pixel 200% unsharp mask to the luminance channel only. Was not successful in finding a noise reduction profile that did not make the whole picture too soft.
I've no idea what it looked like in real life but this looks pretty good to me. :)

I had to down size the images to meet forum file size limitations.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Max :rolleyes:
There's no such thing as a bad photo, just the wrong audience.
EQUIPMENT: Canon Powershot S3 IS, 2x Transcend 2GB x150 SD, 2x 4GB Class 4 Dane-Elec SDHC, LensMate 52mm Adapter Tube and lots of stuff to hang on it.
A couple of flashes and a couple of strobes. My other camera is a Sony DSC-P200.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
283CID
Senior Member
330 posts
Joined May 2004
     
Dec 11, 2006 12:23 as a reply to  @ MaxZoom's post |  #8

WOW !!! As I read your posting I saw this:

"I also took a few movies, and rotated them when I got home, but ZoomBrowser seems to have altered the quality of the video?!?! I have the originals yet, but I don't understand why it would change anything but the rotation. The rotated movies look a lot noisier."

Could you please tell me/us how you rotated movies ? My wife took a few .avi files with the camera in the vertical position...and grumbles at having to look sideways at them! If there is a way to 'straighten' them up she would SURE appreciate knowing it...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 11, 2006 13:22 |  #9

If you rotated a movie, it's quite likely that there was some loss of quality due to the re-compression of hte video data in the new orientation. Currently, still JPEWG images aren't actually rotated; compliant software recognizes a "rotation" flag, which tells the application which end was up when the picture was taken. If you rotate a still, this is changed to the new appropriate one. But videos are physically rotated; virtually every bit is relocated, so the file needs to be recompressed. Also your video's only about 640x480 pixels; if you blow that up to full screen, it'll look blocky.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
283CID
Senior Member
330 posts
Joined May 2004
     
Dec 11, 2006 18:02 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #10

C'mon Jon... you gonna tell me HOW you do that, so I can get Mrs. Whats-Her-Name off my back ??? p l e a s e ??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mishnogram
Senior Member
Avatar
264 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
     
Dec 11, 2006 19:34 |  #11

283CID wrote in post #2386386 (external link)
C'mon Jon... you gonna tell me HOW you do that, so I can get Mrs. Whats-Her-Name off my back ??? p l e a s e ??

I have never tried doing it with Zoombrowser but can do it with Windows Movie Maker as well which comes free with Windows. Just select effects and either rotate 90degress or 270 degrees.

Hope that helps.


Min
Canon Rebel xt with kit len, Sigma 55-200mm F4-5.6 DC, Canon S2IS, & not enough time to use them all.
http://picasaweb.googl​e.com/mishnogram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2Shiny
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Stevens Point, WI
     
Dec 11, 2006 20:11 |  #12

283CID wrote in post #2385006 (external link)
Could you please tell me/us how you rotated movies ? My wife took a few .avi files with the camera in the vertical position...and grumbles at having to look sideways at them! If there is a way to 'straighten' them up she would SURE appreciate knowing it...

Open ZoomBrowser.
Open a movie.
Click Edit on the left sidebar.
Click Edit Movie.
Click Rotate.
Click the desired direction of rotation.
Click OK.
Click Save.


Paul
D20, SX40

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
283CID
Senior Member
330 posts
Joined May 2004
     
Dec 11, 2006 21:41 as a reply to  @ 2Shiny's post |  #13

PRICELESS !!! By Gar, 'Shiny.. if I still loved up in The Soo, I'd bring you by a case of GOOD beer for that one. [Just shows how we have NOT looked under all the rocks in the Z/B program]

Thank you very much...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,212 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
S2 noise at ISO200? / ZoomBrowser altering video quality?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1560 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.