Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 11 Dec 2006 (Monday) 00:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Those duplicates/not so good shots

 
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 11, 2006 00:45 |  #1

From every wedding I sort my images in bridge according to these ratings:
1) Out of focus, massively bad exposure (not too many of these luckily), and really boring photos. Lighting tests.
2) Duplicates, boring shots
3) Proofs
4) My picks for the album
5) Portfolio shots

Everyone in #1 gets deleted, everything else is current kept as RAW, backed up, etc. I just added up everything classed as #2, it comes to 28GB just for the past 12 months!

I can't bring myself to ditch them all, in case great aunt mildred dies and they want me to see if I have any images... but then again they've never seen them and probably wouldn't think to ask. I think i'll manually look them over, delete the really bad ones, and archive the rest as JPG - a space saving of around 80% or so, which is significant given i've enough space on my drives for about one more wedding before I have to buy more storage (this is a business remember, every $ counts).

What does everyone else do with these #2 type shots?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Dec 11, 2006 00:50 |  #2

I actually only keep the cream of the crop. They cover your #3, 4 & 5. (I just don't divide them up) ...I do use DPP's rating system though - so, I guess I am dividing them in a way, except dumping the losers. (#1 & 2)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Su-Hannie
Senior Member
Avatar
250 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: South Africa Pretoria
     
Dec 11, 2006 00:54 |  #3

try not to take them ;)

I started to think a bit more (film) if I can say so. My first wedding I took 800+ photos, a lot were duplicates, not so much boring though.

Now I've started to think to take better shots but fewer. ( I take my time more to make sure the pic is just right in all aspects.) I've got them down to about 500-600 per wedding. I ditch duplicates, keep the best one between them. Seeing that my biggest package are 220 photos, it's still plenty.

Just went through my wedding of 9 Dec. And must honestly say I think I managed in not getting to many duplicates. Have only ditched 2 so far for bad exposure.


Canon EOS 350D x 2
Canon EF 50mm f\1.4 USM , Canon EFS 18-55mm, Sigma 70-300mm
Canon Speedlight 580 EX, Falcon Professional Strobes 250w x 2
Softbox 90cm, umbrellas silver, white Manfrotto Tripod lots of filters/goodies

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 11, 2006 01:08 |  #4

I don't categorize mine the same way but I dump everything that I don't want to offer up for sale. If it's not on my site at the time of proofing, I don't have it anymore. I've sold at least one print of every shot that I put up, and that's how I want to keep it. I do have the ability to disable without deleting the ones I don't consider 'folio shots, so I do that a short time after the client purchases their prints. If I'm contacted because they want to order more, I simply enable the ones that were disabled and they can order the same as they did the first time around.

That said, I don't shoot much in the first place & most of my deletions happen the day of via chimping. I can pretty much tell right away what I don't want to keep.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 11, 2006 01:09 |  #5

I deliberately take duplicates, because you can never tell if people will blink. That's saved many photos for me. When things happen really quickly often it's just shoot away, obviously not like a madman, but still more than you'll show the customer. I also don't limit numbers, I just aim to show them around 300-350 max.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Dec 11, 2006 01:11 |  #6

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2383248 (external link)
I don't categorize mine the same way but I dump everything that I don't want to offer up for sale. If it's not on my site at the time of proofing, I don't have it anymore. I've sold at least one print of every shot that I put up, and that's how I want to keep it. I do have the ability to disable without deleting the ones I don't consider 'folio shots, so I do that a short time after the client purchases their prints. If I'm contacted because they want to order more, I simply enable the ones that were disabled and they can order the same as they did the first time around.

That's my philosophy as well.

tim wrote in post #2383253 (external link)
I deliberately take duplicates, because you can never tell if people will blink. That's saved many photos for me. When things happen really quickly often it's just shoot away, obviously not like a madman, but still more than you'll show the customer. I also don't limit numbers, I just aim to show them around 300-350 max.

Regarding dupe shots, I agree 100%. I just keep the best of the batch.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 11, 2006 01:12 |  #7

tim wrote in post #2383253 (external link)
I deliberately take duplicates, because you can never tell if people will blink. That's saved many photos for me. When things happen really quickly often it's just shoot away, obviously not like a madman, but still more than you'll show the customer. I also don't limit numbers, I just aim to show them around 300-350 max.

For formals I do take dupes, and sometimes 2fors or 3fors in general shooting but I chimp right away and delete the duds if I have a sec.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Su-Hannie
Senior Member
Avatar
250 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: South Africa Pretoria
     
Dec 11, 2006 01:23 |  #8

Tim - I hear about the eyes, do take duplicates of all formals. But couple shoots I can tell if I've got a blink, and then take the shot again. Never had the - oh I wish I took this one again, damn the eyes are closed...


Canon EOS 350D x 2
Canon EF 50mm f\1.4 USM , Canon EFS 18-55mm, Sigma 70-300mm
Canon Speedlight 580 EX, Falcon Professional Strobes 250w x 2
Softbox 90cm, umbrellas silver, white Manfrotto Tripod lots of filters/goodies

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 11, 2006 02:25 |  #9

I've had a customer come back a couple of week after they saw the proofs with "i'm sure you took shot xyz, but I don't see it in the proofs". I managed to find it in the outcasts. It was a pretty average shot, but the person in it was what was important. If i'd ditched it then they'd have lost it.

I think i'll delete the obvious duplicates and convert the rest to JPG... just in case. Better than my current system of keeping them as huge RAW files!


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 11, 2006 02:27 |  #10

tim wrote in post #2383438 (external link)
I've had a customer come back a couple of week after they saw the proofs with "i'm sure you took shot xyz, but I don't see it in the proofs". I managed to find it in the outcasts. It was a pretty average shot, but the person in it was what was important. If i'd ditched it then they'd have lost it.

I think i'll delete the obvious duplicates and convert the rest to JPG... just in case. Better than my current system of keeping them as huge RAW files!

I have a clause in my contract that states I delete the duds. If they **** because they thought I took a shot or because they know I took it but delete it, I can point them to the statement. I'm not going to hang onto crappy ones on a "just in case" basis. While the chances of actually getting sued for not having a certain shot is slim to none, at least I can point to the paper to explain that they were basically told in advance not to expect me to have every shot that they think I took. I have a "special requests" section on my contract wherein they can specify persons they want to make sure I capture. Then I can know to get a good shot because I have to. If I don't know it's a shot they definitely want, I don't know to keep it.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 11, 2006 02:35 |  #11

What if you miss a shot in the "special requests" section?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 11, 2006 03:38 |  #12

tim wrote in post #2383466 (external link)
What if you miss a shot in the "special requests" section?

I don't. But there's also a clause in there saying that I'm not liable for missed shots, period...just in case.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobKirkwood
Goldmember
1,124 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
     
Dec 11, 2006 03:47 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #13

Soon as possible after the wedding we copy all RAW files onto computer and then burn DVD (2 copies) and file them ...usually these have been sorted into groups, and include everything we shot - even group 1.

Soon as that's done (and verified) we delete the original cards we used on the day (still have an additional backup of everything shot on our Jobo GigaONE - copied on the day as we go along).

We then retain most of the images on hard-disk while we're busy with pp and any album work ...once pp is finished we burn further DVD/CD copies of the 'delivered' images and any album page stuff. At some stage during this process we'll wipe the files from GigaONE soon as we're comfortable with doing so.

Have no hard and fast rules on when we delete from hard-disk
- but we tend to keep at least the delivered and album stuff available for a few months after the wedding (or other event) ...and, provided the DVDs and CDs remain readable, we still have everything somewhere even if we've wiped it from hard-disk.

We are looking at network-attached storage though, as a way of shifting stuff off the working computer's hard-disk but still retaining it online and in an easily accessible form (this would be in addition to offline DVD/CD copies).

So, short answer :)... we file group 2 (and group 1) onto DVD and keep them - we never knowingly delete anything we bring back from the day. Past experience in life has taught me I always need something the day after I threw it away.

Rob




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberPet
Hiding Under a Rock
Avatar
4,052 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Piteå, Sweden
     
Dec 11, 2006 05:05 |  #14

I'm like a squirrel, I collect/save everything. I really should just throw those shots that doesn't make the cut, but somehow I dont' have the heart to do it. I just buy larger harddisks (external) and store the stuff on those, put a new disk in the case for the next season (or whatever it takes before the whole disk is full).


/Petra Hall
Click here to view my geeky gear list
I shoot as much as possible in available light... sometimes, my flash is available – Joe Buissink

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 11, 2006 05:07 |  #15

I just ditched about 3GB of RAWs, and i'm batching a bunch more to JPG. I'll probably save 20GB of disk space by the time I discard/convert the whole lot. I'll need a new hard disk before long anyway, but at least this puts it off, and takes the stress off my backup disk so I don't need to replace that right away too.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,791 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Those duplicates/not so good shots
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1106 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.