I would like to see how the ISO 3200 shots look before and after you clean them up. Could you please post some?
superdiver Cream of the Crop  9,862 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Ketchikan Alaska More info | Dec 11, 2006 11:15 | #1 I would like to see how the ISO 3200 shots look before and after you clean them up. Could you please post some? 40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Dec 11, 2006 11:34 | #2  Permanent banI haven't had to do noise reduction on any of my iso3200 shots, or even iso3200 EC-1 from my 5D. You wouldn't see the noise on a 800x600 web shot or an 8x10 print. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
superdiver THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 9,862 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Ketchikan Alaska More info | Dec 11, 2006 11:45 | #3 I dont doubt that from what I have heard, but like they say, picture is worth a thousand words...LOL 40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT  10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Absolutely no Noise Suppression software was used.  
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamJL Goldmember  4,365 posts Likes: 13 Joined May 2006 Location: 'Straya More info | Dec 11, 2006 11:52 | #5 Any PP there Toney?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Dec 11, 2006 12:00 | #6 AdamJL wrote in post #2384893  Any PP there Toney? Levels/curves adjustment might reduce the visibility of noise That was shot in RAW when I first got the 30D at default parameters. Processed via RawShooter Premium and finished in Photoshop Elements for resizing for web posting with the 100/0.5/0 USM, which might have added a touch of noise. I didn't even own any noise reducing software at the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bildeb0rg Goldmember  More info | Dec 11, 2006 13:50 | #7 Hi, a quickie for Bluedog_XT; Does you know if RSP has the facillity to process cr2 RAWs from my 400d/xti. I tried using the free version of RSE, and got file unsupported. Be nice to know before I buy. Thanx.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
coreypolis Cream of the Crop  6,793 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Mercer Island, WA More info | Dec 11, 2006 13:57 | #8 Permanent banpreoper exposure is key to shooting at high iso and little noise. No PP on these, just straight RAW conversions with no noise reduction.
Photographic Resources
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33  2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | Dec 11, 2006 14:03 | #9
canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scrumpy Goldmember  3,664 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Dorset, England More info | Dec 11, 2006 14:22 | #10 bildeb0rg wrote in post #2385331 Hi, a quickie for Bluedog_XT; Does you know if RSP has the facillity to process cr2 RAWs from my 400d/xti. I tried using the free version of RSE, and got file unsupported. Be nice to know before I buy. Thanx. RSE though still availabe, doesn't support the 400D files, and its big brother Raw Shooter Premium no longer exists, and anyway that didn't support the 400D either. Shame really, they were great tools. David: Canon EOS 400D - Canon EF70-300mm f/4-55.6 IS USM -Sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.5 DC Macro - Sigma 50-500 'Bigma' - Speedlite 580EX 11 - Better Beamer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer"  More info | Dec 11, 2006 14:43 | #11 scrumpy wrote in post #2385466 RSE though still availabe, doesn't support the 400D files, and its big brother Raw Shooter Premium no longer exists, and anyway that didn't support the 400D either. Shame really, they were great tools. just get the latest version of RSE if available supported to open 400D RAW and go dance. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Dec 11, 2006 16:41 | #12 coreypolis wrote in post #2385357 preoper exposure is key to shooting at high iso and little noise. No PP on these, just straight RAW conversions with no noise reduction. And that is the key _ super nice results too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sydor25 Goldmember  2,356 posts Likes: 15 Joined Feb 2005 Location: North Texas More info | Dec 11, 2006 17:09 | #13 Canon 20D with 75-300mm lens.
Used Noise Ninja and resized for web:
1D Mark III, 5D Mark III, EF 17-40 f/4, EF 24-105 f/4 IS, EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6, EF 24 f/1.4, EF 300 f/4 IS, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro & EF-S 10-22
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 Everlasting Gobstopper  6,455 posts Likes: 38 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Trantor More info |
tsaraleksi Goldmember  1,653 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA More info | Dec 11, 2006 17:45 | #15
This is 3200 underexposed by 1/2 to 2 stops and pushed in post. Rugby is a pain in the butt to shoot, but I think this makes a good example of what happens when you underexpose at 3200-- you'll still get a useable image but it will be very very noisy. I couldn't extract anything useful from the shots that wound up more than 2 stops under. Here are some more properly exposed shots--
I find that oof areas tend to display noise much more readily than the in focus parts, presumably because the textures of the focused parts disguise the noise. These have only had default lightroom color noise reduction done. --Alex Editorial Portfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2487 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
