Another impromptu shoot for a friend with another fairly uncommon vehicle. Too much sun unfortunately, but I think they came out halfway decent. C&C welcome as always. 
Dec 11, 2006 13:37 | #1 Another impromptu shoot for a friend with another fairly uncommon vehicle. Too much sun unfortunately, but I think they came out halfway decent. C&C welcome as always.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ArenGh Senior Member 391 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Gilbert, AZ More info | Dec 11, 2006 13:46 | #2 There's an interesting quality to the lighting in these pictures. Would you mind saying what kind of PP work you've done on these pictures? http://www.flickr.com/arengh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
infinite012 Senior Member 602 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Sterling, VA More info | Dec 11, 2006 14:46 | #3 I love the styling of the XLR. The V just builds on it and you've captured the beauty of a not-made-for-old-people Cadillac. Michael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2006 17:38 | #4 Thanks kindly!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chris78cpr Senior Member 586 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: London - UK More info | Dec 12, 2006 18:11 | #5 2nd photo is very nice. Canon 5dmkii | 7d | Canon 1dmkii | Canon 400D | Canon 10D | Canon 1VHS | Canon Eos 3 | 17-40F4L | 24-105F4LIS | 70-200F2.8LIS | 100-400LIS | 15F2.8 | 20F1.8EX | 50F1.4 | 85F1.8 | 100F2.8 Macro | 2 x 550EX | 1.4xII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Dec 12, 2006 21:41 | #6 Nice ride, & I'm sort of liking them, but they're just a little unnatural for me. They'd make a great poster, though. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SonicZoom Senior Member 321 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Dec 12, 2006 21:43 | #7 waaaaaay over contrasted, and in a parking lot? booo Clint Davis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Dec 13, 2006 21:06 | #8 waaaaaay over contrasted, and in a parking lot? booo Put that car in a better location, and go easy on the post. Geeez! Yesterday you said,"These pictures are for sharing and showing off right?, not critique." Today you come out with this. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
No big deal Photosguy, I have tough skin.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SonicZoom Senior Member 321 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Dec 14, 2006 00:02 | #10 We only see the results. I didn't know your time was short, and you had to take quick snap shots in 20 degree weather. For all i know this could of been a well efforted shoot. So sorry to critique you for pictures that aren't at your full potential. Clint Davis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Dec 14, 2006 07:30 | #11 I didn't know your time was short, and you had to take quick snap shots in 20 degree weather. For all i know this could of been a well efforted shoot. So sorry to critique you for pictures that aren't at your full potential. I'm not sure that these comments are an improvment in your attitude, especially the "So sorry" & "aren't at your full potential" parts? It's reading like, "No, I'm really not sorry. I'm a better shooter than you are & your work is crap?" FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 14, 2006 13:23 | #12 SonicZoom wrote in post #2397747 We only see the results. I didn't know your time was short, and you had to take quick snap shots in 20 degree weather. For all i know this could of been a well efforted shoot. So sorry to critique you for pictures that aren't at your full potential. Exactly why I said "impromptu" in the very first post. Thought I had made that clear. SonicZoom wrote: I do like the warmer feel of your post work in the first 2 car pictures, however you're shooting too dark and loosing a lot of detail in the tires and dark spots on the car. f I saw this car for the first time, I wouldn't know where teh front bumper ends, and the pavement begins. Thanks, but I can clearly make out tire tread and that there is writing on the sidewall. What more detail should there be? Keep in mind also that the posting limitations on this forum, and rendering on the web, force us all to post lower quality images with a loss of detail. I think you should honestly check your monitor settings.....I can clearly see where the bumper ends and even that there is an underbody spoiler on the front of the car. SonicZoom wrote: The reflections are off the chart in the first car pic. very very distracting, and the lines of the car get lost. The 2nd pic is much more pleasing. The reflections are reduced, and the car is more prominent. But yet again, the location isn't ideal. To each his own. I personally am quite tired of seeing featureless, over polarized, no reflection, unrealistic car photos. Are the reflections a bit too much? Yes....as I said in the OP....the light was less than ideal. And I get it already......you don't like parking lots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RocknE30 Member 116 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | I really like the photoshop work you did to get that type of tone. I agree that it really changes the mood of the photo; I like it a lot. My only gripes are the reflections in the second shot, but people you've heard enough about that already so there's no need to go on. My one suggestion is that you could photoshop the lines out in photoshop, they are somewhat distracting and if they were removed it'd take away that parking lot feel. Canon 30D w/kit lens & 75-300mm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 14, 2006 19:50 | #14 Thank you for the input!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SonicZoom Senior Member 321 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Dec 14, 2006 22:28 | #15 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1256 guests, 180 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||