Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Dec 2006 (Tuesday) 09:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Newbie: what camera should I get?

 
kgauger30
Senior Member
Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Florida
     
Dec 12, 2006 09:18 |  #1

I am new here and see all these posts. You all seem like great ppl with lots of knowledge in cameras and equiptment. So I am posing this question to you. I am just getting started and want to learn and maybe sometime soon down the road when I get the hang of this go pro. So here is my question.....

I want to know what camera and lens I should get a a pretty tight budget. I will be focused on taking all different kinds of pictures from youth baseball, football, landscapes and kids. The problem is my starting budget. The one time of year I get to buy anything is tax time and my husband is going to give me $1000 of it to spend on my camera and accessories. (hoping to get a little more than that though hehehehee:D ) So with that little bit of money (alot to me, not when it comes to the price of this stuff though) what should I get?

I am hoping to get things along the way to, but this may be my start for a few months.

Oh and I get a 10% discount at Walmart and I know they sell the 20 and 30 D..

Thanks for all your help everyone.
Hope to chat with you all!!

Kim


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.com (external link)
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canoflan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,059 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Texas, US
     
Dec 12, 2006 09:21 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

kgauger30 wrote in post #2388904 (external link)
I am new here and see all these posts. You all seem like great ppl with lots of knowledge in cameras and equiptment. So I am posing this question to you. I am just getting started and want to learn and maybe sometime soon down the road when I get the hang of this go pro. So here is my question.....

I want to know what camera and lens I should get a a pretty tight budget. I will be focused on taking all different kinds of pictures from youth baseball, football, landscapes and kids. The problem is my starting budget. The one time of year I get to buy anything is tax time and my husband is going to give me $1000 of it to spend on my camera and accessories. (hoping to get a little more than that though hehehehee:D ) So with that little bit of money (alot to me, not when it comes to the price of this stuff though) what should I get?

I am hoping to get things along the way to, but this may be my start for a few months.

Oh and I get a 10% discount at Walmart and I know they sell the 20 and 30 D..

Thanks for all your help everyone.
Hope to chat with you all!!

Kim

Welcome.

I would get an excellent condition (perhaps new) Rebel XT body and a 17-40 f/4L lens. That will keep you close to $1000. The lens will make the most of your pictures than any camera in that price range.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Florida
     
Dec 12, 2006 09:25 as a reply to  @ canoflan's post |  #3

Yeah I know $1000 isnt much when you are talking about starting out. I am actually jealous of people that can get more LOL.. but I have to do what I can. I am hoping to squeeze out a little more.. Maybe up to $1500 ??? I can hope right? :lol:


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.com (external link)
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 12, 2006 09:27 |  #4

The 17-40 won't work for youth sports; you'll have vast expanses of field with small specks of kids unless you're right on top of the action. With the XT, get the "kit" 18-55 mm lens, a 50 mm f/1.8 (for indoors and low light conditions) and maybe the Sigma 70-300 or the Canon 100-300 zoom for daytime sports. You'll be able to focus on the kids while staying safely out of their (and the officials') way.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Florida
     
Dec 12, 2006 09:35 |  #5

With my discount I can get the XT kit for 604.41 that includes tax and shipping. Is that a good deal for that camera? I am so undecided but I am trying to do as much research as possible before February because this is such a huge decision. Thanks for your replies!!


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.com (external link)
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jonathan ­ Consiglio
Senior Member
294 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
     
Dec 12, 2006 09:46 |  #6

If you can squeeze a little more, go for the 30D with maybe the EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM. The Rebel can be had at a good price, but it's built different than the other SLR models like the 20D on up. If you eventually want to do some pro work, the 30D looks a little better than a Rebel, in my opinion. I HATE to say this, but if you're using the same camera that "Uncle Joe" does (most likely a Rebel) people can be a little reluctant, even if your pics are 20 times better. This isn't just me, this is written in some photography books, your camera has presence...and the better the camera, the better Non-Photographers will SOMETIMES look a you. I'm not saying this to put anyone down for their equipment, this is just what I've read and been told. As stupid as it is! Definitely DO NOT let them sell you an EF-S lens. These will not work on cameras with a Full Frame Sensor, and evntually, someday, you will probably own a camera with a Full Frame. This is where digital is headed eventually...so I've read. Look at Sigma and Tamron lenses. You can get a nice lens with a 2.8 Aperture (faster shutter speeds in lower light) cheaper than from Canon. I still say Canon, but I understand the budget. Like I said, I'd start ou in the 24-70 through 28-135 range for the first lens. Anything less will not handle sports well at all! Good luck, and I hope I helped a little..


www.consigliophotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Dec 12, 2006 09:49 |  #7

Hi Kim,

welcome to the forum !
The price for the Digital Rebel XT is ok ... the 'gold standard' of the forum is www.bhphotovideo.com (external link) that is normally the cheapest reputable shop. They have the package for 599$ which is about the same price. Of course, Wal-Mart might not have the best name as a reputable camera shop, but if you are affiliated to them, it might help ease things.

There is always the old discussion ... buy a better body or rather spend the money on lenses. Both suggestions have their merit.

While a better body (and better here means more ergonomic, more stable, more flashy, but not giving better image quality) certainly feels very nice in your hand, the lenses will be what will stay with you a long time, when you have already upgraded the body. My suggestion is ... go to a good camera shop and hold both in your hand.

If you are not a large person, the Rebel XT might actually feel more convenient in your hand (it's smaller), or you might just like the 20D/30D better. Only you can tell. And as long as you get the black version, I think it does not look unprofessional either ... especially not if you decide to get the 'grip' at some point in time and some serious (that means large & expensive :wink: ) lenses. In the meantime, you might as well enjoy a better lens that you buy with the money you save on the body and get practice, practice, practice. I assume you will not start out as a pro early next year. And the money you save on the camera body might make the difference between a (consumer) 70-300 and a professional 70-200/4.0 L that might be a lot more helpful for sports...

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Florida
     
Dec 12, 2006 09:55 |  #8

Andythaler wrote in post #2389020 (external link)
Hi Kim,

welcome to the forum !
The price for the Digital Rebel XT is ok ... the 'gold standard' of the forum is www.bhphotovideo.com (external link) that is normally the cheapest reputable shop. They have the package for 599$ which is about the same price. Of course, Wal-Mart might not have the best name as a reputable camera shop, but if you are affiliated to them, it might help ease things.

Best regards,
Andy

I have no problems at all going somewhere else. I just didn't know if I could get the same price somewhere. The link is great thanks alot. Like I said I want to get the most for my money, even though it is not alot. LOL I have heard BH Photo mentioned alot in different forums so I will definitly check them out!!.

Thanks for the welcome too! I hope to be here alot LOL

Kim


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.com (external link)
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Florida
     
Dec 12, 2006 10:00 |  #9

Jonathan Consiglio wrote in post #2388999 (external link)
If you can squeeze a little more, go for the 30D with maybe the EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM. The Rebel can be had at a good price, but it's built different than the other SLR models like the 20D on up. If you eventually want to do some pro work, the 30D looks a little better than a Rebel, in my opinion. I HATE to say this, but if you're using the same camera that "Uncle Joe" does (most likely a Rebel) people can be a little reluctant, even if your pics are 20 times better. This isn't just me, this is written in some photography books, your camera has presence...and the better the camera, the better Non-Photographers will SOMETIMES look a you. I'm not saying this to put anyone down for their equipment, this is just what I've read and been told. As stupid as it is! Definitely DO NOT let them sell you an EF-S lens. These will not work on cameras with a Full Frame Sensor, and evntually, someday, you will probably own a camera with a Full Frame. This is where digital is headed eventually...so I've read. Look at Sigma and Tamron lenses. You can get a nice lens with a 2.8 Aperture (faster shutter speeds in lower light) cheaper than from Canon. I still say Canon, but I understand the budget. Like I said, I'd start ou in the 24-70 through 28-135 range for the first lens. Anything less will not handle sports well at all! Good luck, and I hope I helped a little..


Thank you for the advise. I totally understand what you mean about the equiptment and "how it looks". I look at that everytime someone takes the pictures of my son's sports. I also feel the same way about that. Thank you for also "dumbing down" lol the 2.8 Aperture lingo. Being just from point and shoot, some of those terms are over my head at least for now :O) I will get there, it will just take me some time.

Thanks again
Kim


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.com (external link)
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elader
Goldmember
Avatar
2,374 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Dec 12, 2006 10:02 |  #10

the servo focus on the rebel pales to the XTi focus which is as good as the 30D. Buy the XTi, get the kit lens, and take the last $300 and get a canon or sigma or tamron 70-200. In the future you'll seriously think about upgrading lenses.

Check out Buydig.com (Beach) - never had a problem.


Eric
FJR1300 rider
5D mkIII and 1D MkIII

16-35L | 24-105L | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 85 f/1.8 / 50 f.1,4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Dec 12, 2006 10:03 |  #11

kgauger30 wrote in post #2388964 (external link)
With my discount I can get the XT kit for 604.41 that includes tax and shipping. Is that a good deal for that camera? I am so undecided but I am trying to do as much research as possible before February because this is such a huge decision. Thanks for your replies!!

What about getting something used?
$1500 is more like it. That will give you options as far as lenses go.

Some lenses to consider.

50mm f/1.8 MkII Cheap and great!
17-85 IS. Pretty good lens for walk-around lens. Not so expensive.
17-55 IS. Best EF-S lens. Walk-around lens. EXPENSIVE!
70-400 f/4L non-IS. L class lens at a "bargain" price.
70-300 IS. Nice range. Get I.S. for a pretty nice price.

First of all, get the 50mm prime. Always good to have and it costs nothing!
You could get a used XT for $500 or a 20D for $600-$700.

If you get a used XT for $500, then that leaves you with $1000...something to work with. If you really want the "best" for the XT in the walk-around lens category, then you could go for the 17-55. You can get that for $900+ from Amazon. But that would be all...maybe squeeze in the 50mm. It's a great lens, and with constant 2.8 + IS, good to have indoors!

If you want better range then you could go for the 17-85IS. Not the greatest, but nice range with IS. Then either go for the 70-200 F/4 non-IS or the 70-300 IS. I read nice things about the 70-300 IS. The 70-200 F/4 we all know is a great lens. That would get you right around $1000 if you buy at least one of them used.

Good luck!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Dec 12, 2006 10:13 |  #12

nicksan wrote in post #2389074 (external link)
70-400 f/4L non-IS. L class lens at a "bargain" price.

Unfortunately, it's only a 70-200/4.0 L lens...
Not to get your hopes too high...

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kgauger30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
800 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Florida
     
Dec 12, 2006 10:18 |  #13

Andythaler wrote in post #2389133 (external link)
Unfortunately, it's only a 70-200/4.0 L lens...
Not to get your hopes too high...

Andy

Oh thats ok... hopes are not high on any of it right now!

nicksan wrote in post #2389074 (external link)
What about getting something used?

I thought about that, but what kind of condition should I not go under? Some sites are different with their ratings, but I don't know what would be a good used value and what would be a no-no..


Kim :D
www.kimberlygaugerphot​ography.com (external link)
Canon 7D Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS, Canon 580exII, 2x extender FOR SALE,Canon 50mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4071
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 12, 2006 10:32 |  #14

Hmmm… there is some good advice here, some interesting advice and some bad advice as well. The fact is that the XT, XTi, 20D, 30D are for all intents near identical cameras. Each has a few features the others do not but image quality between the models are indistinguishable. The biggest difference between them is the feel of the camera and if that is of importance, then I advise going and handling all of them and choose the one you like best. But choosing a model just because the pros are going to make fun of you and call you a dork is just plain silly. My advice is make a list of what’s important to you. What type of shooting interests you most? How often are you going to make prints larger than 8x10? Which feel best in your hands? Is there one feature one has but another does not that just screams to you? Are you planning on taking photos in hazardous environments? For someone just starting on a budget I would get the cheapest body possible and put the $$$ into glass. New bodies come out every year or so but glass will stay around for a long time. If sometime in the future you decide to turn pro you can always upgrade your body to one appropriate to you business.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Ng
Goldmember
Avatar
1,208 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2005
Location: Hartsdale, NY
     
Dec 12, 2006 11:04 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #15

Get yourself a Rebel XT or Rebel XTi with the kit lens and a Canon 50mm 1.8 If all you have is $1000 you have to remember that you're going to need a filter or two, a camera bag, you'll want to save for a decent flash, and you should get a tripod or monopod.

The equipment I listed will be enough to get you started and learning which right now, is more important than anything else.

Bill


Billy Ng
1 Body
4 Lenses
3 Strobes
Never enough time

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,901 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Newbie: what camera should I get?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2487 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.