Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 12 Dec 2006 (Tuesday) 12:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Pro's using sigma lenses

 
wjohns
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central Pennsylvania
     
May 01, 2013 20:45 as a reply to  @ post 2471199 |  #106

The one Pro that I know of who uses Sigma lenses all the time is Lindsay Adler. I know for a fact she really puts her equipment through its' paces but then again Sigma probably hand picks her lenses for her.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sonofjesse
Senior Member
Avatar
692 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
May 03, 2013 22:00 |  #107

AS long as your happy and your clients who cares if your using a pinhole lens?

We got to think many of great pictures were taken 50 years ago. Now we have much sharper glass, insane quick aF, unlimited post edit options. So yes Sigma can make good pics.


FeedBack
Feedback 2
Feedback 3
Feedback 4
Feedback 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8389
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
May 03, 2013 23:21 |  #108

picturecrazy wrote in post #2390248 (external link)
It's funny, the gearheads I know have amazing equipment and the pros I know don't.

This is far more true than many people realize.

The top photographer for my local newspaper is still shooting with a Nikon D200, and has never had any of Nikon's "better" lenses ("nikkor", I think they call them).

The top pro in my entire county is still shooting with the first digital cameras he ever bought - a pair of Fuji DSLRs that he got back in, like, 2003. Yet he is the go-to photographer for anyone in my area wanting wedding, senior, portrait, team sports, and baby photography.

It's funny how lay people think full time pros have the latest and greatest gear. Just not true at all.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
May 04, 2013 00:58 |  #109

Wow, 2006 - 2013 and it didn't skip a beat!


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ktan7
Goldmember
1,016 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Vancouver
     
May 04, 2013 09:30 |  #110

I personally use all L lenses and stay away from aftermarket lenses. Don't trust anything else other than real factory lenses. But, I'm sure sigma lenses are awesome.


Vancouver wedding photography (external link)
Picture blog (external link)
Mexico wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
May 04, 2013 11:36 as a reply to  @ ktan7's post |  #111

I'm no pro, butI refer you to my prior post here.

So call me a no-talent gearhead. I love my L's.

I know you're asking about what Pro's do - I'm just chiming in with a comparison from one anti-pro.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kronie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,183 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2008
     
May 04, 2013 15:50 |  #112

Tom Reichner wrote in post #15895921 (external link)
This is far more true than many people realize.

The top photographer for my local newspaper is still shooting with a Nikon D200, and has never had any of Nikon's "better" lenses ("nikkor", I think they call them).

The top pro in my entire county is still shooting with the first digital cameras he ever bought - a pair of Fuji DSLRs that he got back in, like, 2003. Yet he is the go-to photographer for anyone in my area wanting wedding, senior, portrait, team sports, and baby photography.

It's funny how lay people think full time pros have the latest and greatest gear. Just not true at all.

So true...My local paper photographer shoots with a 30D and a 17-85 + 70-300 and a 430EX.

In the last two years I went to maybe 6 weddings as a guest and only one wedding where the they used top of the line gear and that was one that must have been a 250K wedding with 350 guests and fireworks and horse drawn sleighs.

It just doesn't make good business sense to buy a 85L when the 85 EF will do the job just as good a job and cost you $1,800 less. The customer wont see a difference.

Me? I am a gearhead. I also do some pro work and I use some sigma lenses. Some I wouldn't touch. Compatibility issues with Canon and the resale loss keeps me from getting anymore. I have owned the 150 macro, 70-200, 30 and the 50. I only own the 50 now but I might get the 35 and try it as some point. I always seem to grab the zooms because they are just so versatile and the two zooms I have 24-70 and 70-200 will cover just about everything you need.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
david ­ lee
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Kent, England
     
May 05, 2013 11:41 |  #113

Whoo Hoo!
I am a talentless Gear-head cos I only own L's
I love being stereotyped.. :-)


davidleeimages.co.uk (external link)
pbase (external link)
gear

"My fingers hurt from taking too many photos" D.A.Lee LBIPP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
May 05, 2013 14:43 |  #114

david lee wrote in post #15899776 (external link)
Whoo Hoo!
I am a talentless Gear-head cos I only own L's
I love being stereotyped.. :-)

I was checking your pbase site. Although, for some quirky reason I really love your stuff, I can see how your L lenses are defective and hold you back. I mean; this one (external link) simply could not manage to get the background in focus. Here (external link), rather than nice pleasing dark shadows, the trees have all this annoying detail and the rich colors of the leaves are just too much to absorb. I don't understand why you would pay more when L consistently gives you these problems.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spiritualdrifter
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Apr 2013
     
May 08, 2013 10:22 |  #115

Austin Stevens is an avid sigma lens user, on a canon body or sometimes a Pentax or Samsung body , but always sigma lenses


www.organicimagery.co.​uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ktan7
Goldmember
1,016 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Vancouver
     
May 09, 2013 16:40 |  #116

The price difference between signma and canon lenses as well are not much. I would save up a few more hundered dollars just to get the L lenses. Buy it once!


Vancouver wedding photography (external link)
Picture blog (external link)
Mexico wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

16,487 views & 0 likes for this thread, 45 members have posted to it.
Pro's using sigma lenses
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1187 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.