This isn't a question thread, but more of an observation. A lot of people say the spot meter on the 30D is not a worthwhile reason to favor it over the xti. Maybe it isn't, but spot combined with all of the other positve points the 30D has over the xti makes it the clear choice. I must say, I have been using spot metering more than I thought I ever would. All the X-Mas pics I have been taking this season have been around or involving christmas lights, fireplaces, and other tricky shots such as taking x-mas pics outside at night with my subjects roasting chestnuts on an open fire, LOL. I tried some of the shots using Evaluative and even partial, but they came out underexposed EVERY TIME. Evaluative sure is easily fooled. I just switched over to M mode with spot metering and my shots all came out correctly exposed or extremely close to it.
I got the 30D as an updrade to my xt (bought the xti when it was first released and I took it back the next day). Don't get me wrong, the xti make for a great starter camera. My xt was my starter and I had it for over a year before I got the 30D.
I upgraded from XT, I find it a nice piece of plastic 

