Ok so weve covered the 5Ds disadvantage for sports photography,how bout now we talk about whether its good for portraits.
thekid24 THREAD STARTER pro-zack-lee 8,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Oklahoma City,OK More info | Dec 14, 2006 01:12 | #31 Ok so weve covered the 5Ds disadvantage for sports photography,how bout now we talk about whether its good for portraits.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | Dec 14, 2006 01:24 | #32 thekid24 wrote in post #2398037 Ok so weve covered the 5Ds disadvantage for sports photography,how bout now we talk about whether its good for portraits. It's the best for it. Why? it takes advantage of the proper focal lengths for lens that were designed for portraits. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JuZ Goldmember 1,615 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 Location: West Sussex, UK More info | Dec 14, 2006 01:48 | #33 Why not keep the 350D and spend the money on decent glass? You'd get a fair bit for the price you're looking to pay for a body. JuZ
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thekid24 THREAD STARTER pro-zack-lee 8,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Oklahoma City,OK More info | Dec 14, 2006 02:19 | #34 the FF is appealing to me for some reason,even though for some photos its overrated.Ive never had one and its just something that seems appealing because although I do like taking fast action Im getting more into portraits and such.I guess its just preference.Sometimes I hate waiting,and knowing I have the means to get the camera now rather than later(months and months)I guess I tend to jump the gun.The smarter way would to go for the glass,i know glass is more important I was just really asking for future reference.Might as well ask know than later.I do have a pretty strong grasp on the technical aspect,I guess I was hoping one someone that had a 5D give their opinion on fast action photos with the model.Kinda a yang to the yin of the model.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thekid24 THREAD STARTER pro-zack-lee 8,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Oklahoma City,OK More info | Dec 14, 2006 02:27 | #35 JuZ wrote in post #2398124 Why not keep the 350D and spend the money on decent glass? You'd get a fair bit for the price you're looking to pay for a body. Is your 350D becoming the limiting factor in the shots you want to take? I have noticed the Xt is a tad slower on faster action.And that the XTi has improved on it.So yeah I guess I feel it was limiting.Maybe im wanting to much too soon.Im trying to get money by not only working but on the side doing portraits,so thats why the 5D came in....the 30D came in due to the faster focus and frame rate.Good for action.It still comes down to what I feel I need.Which is what everyone is telling me,that and go for glass,which I know.lol
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thekid24 THREAD STARTER pro-zack-lee 8,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Oklahoma City,OK More info | Dec 14, 2006 02:33 | #36 |
thekid24 THREAD STARTER pro-zack-lee 8,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Oklahoma City,OK More info | Dec 14, 2006 14:36 | #37 As of 2:29pm 12/24.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canoflan Goldmember 1,059 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Texas, US More info | Dec 14, 2006 14:40 | #38 Permanent banget 5D. You'll be fine. Most camera for the money.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottE Goldmember 3,179 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2004 Location: Kelowna, Canada More info | Dec 14, 2006 21:10 | #39 If it is a dilema, get the 30D. The 5D is a very good camera for those who have specific requirements and know why they need the camera. If you needed a 5D you would know and would not have to ask on the internet. The 30D is a mid market camera designed to meet the needs of the majority of photographers. It is the best choice for most of us as an optimal compromise between cost and performance.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thekid24 THREAD STARTER pro-zack-lee 8,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Oklahoma City,OK More info | Dec 14, 2006 21:21 | #40 Well to be honest I didnt know exactly what the 5D was aimed for until I talked to the guy at the photo store.I,like anyone else,can read reviews but a majority of those review the good more so the bad.Or maybe bad isnt the word,maybe the weaker points of the camera.How it handles higher ISO and how the WB is are the topics i read about most.At 3fps the 5D is too slow for what Im wanting it for.And from what Ive heard and been told,the camera that would really set me off good would be a Mk2n,which looking at the price is gonna be a while before I have that in my hands.So Ive decided Ill buy some L lenses for the Xt I have now and eventually pick up a mk2n...or possibly a mark3 if they come out with one and it has some impressive upgrades.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1693 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||