Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 14 Dec 2006 (Thursday) 10:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Indoor Soccer Help

 
DarrenL
Senior Member
873 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Dec 15, 2006 18:08 |  #16

Cassy

The EXIF data on the 2 images you posted show your ISO is 200. Is that correct?

For soccer (indoor or outdoor) I have an absolute miminum shutter of 1/320. Even with that, I am pushing it as arms and legs swing very fast. Any lower than this are you are going to get a large percentage of OOF shots. The glass is also going to be effecting your focus. Did you try manual focus on a preset area. I.e. goal mouth, half way circle etc. ?

And I agree there are alot of VERY talanted soccer shooters on here. Gavin, Marc and a few others.

Darren


www.dlactionimages.co.​uk (external link)
Sportsshooter Member (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sfinkernagel
Senior Member
464 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 141
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Pocono Lake, PA USA
     
Dec 16, 2006 09:24 |  #17

I am not sure whose settings you are asking about, If it's mine, here you go:

Digital Rebel (300D)
85/1.8 (for indoor)
RAW (Yes, it takes time, but I like the control)
AV (usually wide open, always close to that)
iso 1600 (Again for indoors- sometimes I can get away with 800 with good lighting)
Center spot focusing
AWB (Usually requires some tweaking in RAW)
Usually from a monopod

I seem to get a bump up in color vibrance in PP, correcting WB, Exposure, saturation, etc. in RAW improves things greatly.

I have one of the "hacks" applied to my camera, so Icould push the ISO up to H (3200). I have had mixed results with noise at that level though, so I usually do not do so. I also use Noise Ninja as part of my PP- I have found that to be a very useful plug-in.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SBK
Member
Avatar
127 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
     
Dec 16, 2006 10:24 |  #18

I'm a bit of a hack butcher photographer so take this advice with a (OK, several) grain of salt, but I switched to RAW long ago and don't regret the extra step or two one bit. Yes, the overall effort can be a little higher, but developing a workflow for yourself around RAW processing doesn't have to be painful. It's second nature for me now.

I consider shooting indoor sports one of those cases where it's absolutely critical (for me) to shoot RAW to produce decent images. I shoot in manual mode, wide open, and usually 200-320 shutter speeds depending on the activity. I've been using manual WB more and more lately, and simply controlling ISO to allow for enough exposure at these settings.

Most of the RAW file handler options provide "tagging" - I take full advantage of this as a function to help with the sorting process. I simply rank the files and skip/delete the OOF or whacked out exposure images. Process the "keepers" out to TIFF, and then run a couple of my preferred actions in Photoshop to convert the TIFFs to JPG in either web-ready or printable format/sizes. Once you have a workflow down, it's not particularly cumbersome and the results are really decent.


Mark
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeratBP
Member
Avatar
215 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Norfolk, VA
     
Dec 16, 2006 15:19 |  #19

i'm going to ask my buddy's wife to shoot our indoor game tomorrow morning, with my 70-200 F4L. thank you all for the advice, i'll setup the camera for her based on your feedback. though we play futsal - gym floor instead of turf. fortunate thing is that the rec center has large windows that let alot of sunlight onto the floor.....in certain spots of course.


- Jeremy Bailey
w/30D and some L Glass, a 50mm, a 580EX II and Gary Fong Lightsphere

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nutnhony
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Quincy,IL
     
Dec 16, 2006 17:16 |  #20

Well reporting back from my day at the indoor arena. Well With the new setting I applied I have seen some improvement. Still not at the % of keeper I get with out door but I am coming to a realization with that I my not get this % quailty due to indoor circumstance I can not control. But I will not give up. I have attached the new pictures of todays games so you can see the diffrence in the images. I still would love to keep improving I guess practice makes perfect. Please keep advice coming.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


http://www.rothsportsp​hoto.com (external link)

:rolleyes: Cassy Roth

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Dec 16, 2006 17:54 |  #21

nutnhony wrote in post #2408846 (external link)
Well reporting back from my day at the indoor arena. Well With the new setting I applied I have seen some improvement. Still not at the % of keeper I get with out door but I am coming to a realization with that I my not get this % quailty due to indoor circumstance I can not control. But I will not give up. I have attached the new pictures of todays games so you can see the diffrence in the images. I still would love to keep improving I guess practice makes perfect. Please keep advice coming.

stop worrying about percentages and the sort. at the end of the day, your goal is to get 1 shot you really like. if you can achieve that goal, then i'm sure there will be plenty of shots in the lot that have everything they need, except that little extra something that makes a shot truely great. for one fundraiser, i shot over a thousand photos in three hours, and out of those, i found 2 that i actually liked a lot (nothing i'de consider great though). how many "keepers" did i get, probably 200 total. how many where worth my 3 hours, about 50 of them. lets put that into consideration... 52/1039= 5%. i would only keep 5% of my shots. those are my real keepers, not the other 150 that are decent snapshots that are in focus, not blurred, etc.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Dec 16, 2006 23:08 |  #22

Search the forum on www.sportsshooter.com (external link) -- There's some good advice there.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nutnhony
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Quincy,IL
     
Dec 17, 2006 11:46 |  #23

I understand that I do concentrate on % alot but if you are in the business to sell the end product would you want the % high? I do not charge to come to the games but my hope is the end result will help produce money. And if my % is low then so is the money.

My focus is still not at the best with indoor as it was in outdoor but today games I will try shooting in Raw and see if this helps.

My goal is to be ready for the indoor tournament in February. So any setting for indoor focus issue please keep giving. Thanks


http://www.rothsportsp​hoto.com (external link)

:rolleyes: Cassy Roth

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyCanon
Member
215 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Dec 18, 2006 08:52 |  #24

it's worse than bb
2.8 is not going to get it done unless u go to 3200


Thanks
Randy

http://www.carolina-sportsphotography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyCanon
Member
215 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Dec 18, 2006 08:55 |  #25

nutnhony wrote in post #2404855 (external link)
No I do not shot in raw Please explain how this would help you need to remember if I shot Let say 600 picture in a night. Won't shooting in raw take me even longer to process if I have to clean up every shot?

Never done Raw. In Jpg it takes me a good 1 1/2 to go thourgh now. And that is with mimium clean up. Then if I add having to run all my keeper through neat to clean them up Thats another 1/2 hour. So if I need to learn to do raw I will try but I will need some talking through to get it done.

u can adjust the EV in RAW but not jpg
if u are tossing that many raw is just as easy to delete


Thanks
Randy

http://www.carolina-sportsphotography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,783 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Indoor Soccer Help
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1579 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.