Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Dec 2006 (Thursday) 21:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Pentax Body Shake Reduction good from 8-800MM?

 
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Dec 14, 2006 21:33 |  #1

http (external link)://www.pentaximaging.c​om/files/scms_docs//PE​NTAX_SR_Description_09​1506.pdf (external link)
According to this paper by Pentax, you can set it from 8-800mm, so I'm assuming that it can work at 800mm focal length. If true, it's pretty impressive.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Dec 14, 2006 21:35 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

but how much does it help at 800mm is the question.


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Dec 14, 2006 21:36 |  #3

According to them 2.5-4 stops. From reviews like dpreview and such about 2 stops. Nice feature to have for free imo.

If what they say is true and you can use 800mm lens with the SR, even one stop on a cropped body would lower your shutter speed from 1/1280 sec to 1/600, two stops would bring it even lower to 1/300.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Dec 14, 2006 21:46 |  #4

doubt it's true, the area covered by the lens is too small to support 2 stops... maybe they mean 2.5-4 stops from 8-80mm, which would make sense... or maybe they mean 800mm lens on a tripod ;)

upon reading the article, i can understand the reason for the settings from 8-800, but this does not mean it will be equally effective at all ranges. main reason for those settings is due to the noticible vibrations (shorter lenses mean smaller, faster movements while longer lenses mean larger and slower movements).


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Dec 14, 2006 21:53 |  #5

No, they wrote 8-800mm, plus the SR cannot be used on tripods and must be turned off.
Maybe someone with a Pentax and a long lens here can test it out for us.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SRPhotographic
Senior Member
Avatar
318 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Gainesville, FL
     
Dec 15, 2006 01:39 |  #6

About time! I've been waiting to shoot 800mm handheld- I take pictures of things really far away at night and could really use a walkaround lens at that length.

(/sarcasm)


"There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept" -Ansel Adams
S.R.Photographic - Gainesville, FL
<website currently under construction>

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Dec 15, 2006 02:04 |  #7

I like Pentax ... they are cool :cool: One of my top three favourite lenses is a Pentax and some say amongst the very best 50mm's you can buy (for shooting rather than polishing obviously!) Yippee for Pentax. Slap Canon IS ass lads :-)


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lani ­ Kai
"blissfully unaware"
Avatar
2,136 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
     
Dec 15, 2006 02:05 |  #8

Tee Why wrote in post #2401830 (external link)
According to them 2.5-4 stops. From reviews like dpreview and such about 2 stops. Nice feature to have for free imo.

It isn't free. The K100D costs about $70 more than the K110D, which doesn't have SR


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Equipment list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
foxbat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,432 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Essex, UK.
     
Dec 15, 2006 03:44 |  #9

Nobody with more than half a brain cell attempts to hand hold an 800mm telephoto lens. One wonders who exactly that marketing drivel is aimed at.


Andy Brown; South-east England. Canon, Sigma, Leica, Zeiss all on Canon DSLRs. My hacking blog (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lani ­ Kai
"blissfully unaware"
Avatar
2,136 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
     
Dec 15, 2006 04:05 |  #10

I tried stacking a 1.4x and a 2x on my 300mm f/4L IS once for 1,344mm equivalent on my 30D. I handheld it with IS on. Image quality was substandard but hey, I filled the frame with a mall 5 and a half miles away...


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Equipment list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,671 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Pentax Body Shake Reduction good from 8-800MM?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1693 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.