If you have a perfectly good Tamron 17-35, Tamron 28-75 and Tamron 70-300 and saw the Canon 17-55 f2.8L IS and Canon 70-300 f4L IS how inclined would you be to sell your Tamrons and go for the Canons?
| POLL: "Would you upgrade from non-IS Tamron to IS Canon?" |
Not inclined - the Tamrons work just fine | 0 0% |
Not that inclined - the Tamrons do everything I need | 2 8% |
so-so - I can see where IS might be advantageous | 4 16% |
Slightly inclined - IS would be good BUT changing is too much hassle for the gain | 1 4% |
fairly inclined - IS would be a great advantage. I don't feel like changing though. | 2 8% |
very inclined. I really want the IS. I struggle at times without IS. | 6 24% |
Incredibly inclined. I'm planning on changing over. | 5 20% |
I'm a gear head. I will change because I have more money than sense. | 5 20% |
rhys Dis-Membered 5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Dec 15, 2006 08:44 | #1 If you have a perfectly good Tamron 17-35, Tamron 28-75 and Tamron 70-300 and saw the Canon 17-55 f2.8L IS and Canon 70-300 f4L IS how inclined would you be to sell your Tamrons and go for the Canons? Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GyRob Cream of the Crop 10,206 posts Likes: 1413 Joined Feb 2005 Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK. More info | Dec 15, 2006 09:06 | #2 i would not have bought the Tamron in the first place "The LensMaster Gimbal"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop 13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Dec 15, 2006 09:08 | #3 The efs 17-55 IS and the 70-200 IS make a great pair. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2006 09:32 | #4 gasrocks wrote in post #2403363 The efs 17-55 IS and the 70-200 IS make a great pair. They make a fantastic pair. If they had been around when I bought my Tamrons then I probably would have bought them instead of the Tamrons. Having had IS on my Canon S1 IS and having tested it with IS on and off, I am pretty sold on IS. I have no problem using non-IS lenses but this is one area where modern technology really helps and where it reduces my need to carry a tripod. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevin_c Cream of the Crop 5,745 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Devon, England More info | Dec 15, 2006 09:43 | #5 Difficult one - I don't own and have never owned a Tamron lens - But I do have the Canon 24-105L and the IS on this lens has come in really handy - so knowing what I know now and as a general question, Yes I would be 'Very Inclined'. -- K e v i n --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2006 09:50 | #6 I'd like to see IS on a wider lens for example a nice 12-24 IS. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete I was "Prime Mover" many years back.... 38,631 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Berkshire, UK More info | Dec 15, 2006 09:52 | #7 rhys wrote in post #2403491 I'd like to see IS on a wider lens for example a nice 12-24 IS. There's no real point. IS is there to counteract the camera shake on decent length zooms. Camera shake problems at wide angles won't be as prevalent, so there's no real need for IS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2006 10:13 | #8 Pete wrote in post #2403499 There's no real point. IS is there to counteract the camera shake on decent length zooms. Camera shake problems at wide angles won't be as prevalent, so there's no real need for IS. On cropped cameras such as the XT a 12mm lens would be the equivalent of 19mm. It's always possible to view camera shake - no matter what the focal length. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1820 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||