Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 15 Dec 2006 (Friday) 08:44
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Would you upgrade from non-IS Tamron to IS Canon?"
Not inclined - the Tamrons work just fine
0
0%
Not that inclined - the Tamrons do everything I need
2
8%
so-so - I can see where IS might be advantageous
4
16%
Slightly inclined - IS would be good BUT changing is too much hassle for the gain
1
4%
fairly inclined - IS would be a great advantage. I don't feel like changing though.
2
8%
very inclined. I really want the IS. I struggle at times without IS.
6
24%
Incredibly inclined. I'm planning on changing over.
5
20%
I'm a gear head. I will change because I have more money than sense.
5
20%

25 voters, 25 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

idle thoughts

 
rhys
Dis-Membered
Avatar
5,351 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Columbia SC
     
Dec 15, 2006 08:44 |  #1

If you have a perfectly good Tamron 17-35, Tamron 28-75 and Tamron 70-300 and saw the Canon 17-55 f2.8L IS and Canon 70-300 f4L IS how inclined would you be to sell your Tamrons and go for the Canons?


Rhys

The empire conquers yet more galaxies:
www.sageworld.co.uk (external link)
www.sageworld.org (external link)
www.sagephotoworld.com (external link)
Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/t​hunderintheheavens (external link)

Free cheese comes only in mousetraps

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Dec 15, 2006 09:06 |  #2

i would not have bought the Tamron in the first place :)
I did tick Im a gear head Not that i have more money than sence But i will buy what give's me the best chance of getting the shot IS will give me that chance.
EDDIT
if Nikon were to sudenly bring out a far better system than Canon that hit spot on focus 90% of the time on birds in flight then i would change over to them .
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Dec 15, 2006 09:08 |  #3

The efs 17-55 IS and the 70-200 IS make a great pair.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys
THREAD ­ STARTER
Dis-Membered
Avatar
5,351 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Columbia SC
     
Dec 15, 2006 09:32 |  #4

gasrocks wrote in post #2403363 (external link)
The efs 17-55 IS and the 70-200 IS make a great pair.

They make a fantastic pair. If they had been around when I bought my Tamrons then I probably would have bought them instead of the Tamrons. Having had IS on my Canon S1 IS and having tested it with IS on and off, I am pretty sold on IS. I have no problem using non-IS lenses but this is one area where modern technology really helps and where it reduces my need to carry a tripod.

I can't see my selling my Tamrons at the moment as they're pretty good lenses. Maybe sometime in the future I will but it's not a priority - well - until I get enough income to be able to do so.


Rhys

The empire conquers yet more galaxies:
www.sageworld.co.uk (external link)
www.sageworld.org (external link)
www.sagephotoworld.com (external link)
Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/t​hunderintheheavens (external link)

Free cheese comes only in mousetraps

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Dec 15, 2006 09:43 |  #5

Difficult one - I don't own and have never owned a Tamron lens - But I do have the Canon 24-105L and the IS on this lens has come in really handy - so knowing what I know now and as a general question, Yes I would be 'Very Inclined'.


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys
THREAD ­ STARTER
Dis-Membered
Avatar
5,351 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Columbia SC
     
Dec 15, 2006 09:50 |  #6

I'd like to see IS on a wider lens for example a nice 12-24 IS.


Rhys

The empire conquers yet more galaxies:
www.sageworld.co.uk (external link)
www.sageworld.org (external link)
www.sagephotoworld.com (external link)
Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/t​hunderintheheavens (external link)

Free cheese comes only in mousetraps

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Dec 15, 2006 09:52 |  #7

rhys wrote in post #2403491 (external link)
I'd like to see IS on a wider lens for example a nice 12-24 IS.

There's no real point. IS is there to counteract the camera shake on decent length zooms. Camera shake problems at wide angles won't be as prevalent, so there's no real need for IS.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys
THREAD ­ STARTER
Dis-Membered
Avatar
5,351 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Columbia SC
     
Dec 15, 2006 10:13 |  #8

Pete wrote in post #2403499 (external link)
There's no real point. IS is there to counteract the camera shake on decent length zooms. Camera shake problems at wide angles won't be as prevalent, so there's no real need for IS.

On cropped cameras such as the XT a 12mm lens would be the equivalent of 19mm. It's always possible to view camera shake - no matter what the focal length.


Rhys

The empire conquers yet more galaxies:
www.sageworld.co.uk (external link)
www.sageworld.org (external link)
www.sagephotoworld.com (external link)
Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/t​hunderintheheavens (external link)

Free cheese comes only in mousetraps

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,140 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
idle thoughts
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1820 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.