Dec 17, 2006 00:38 | #16 Yeah, I used to shoot mostly JPGs because of the processing time in RAW back in 2003 when computers were not really that fast. With faster computers and harddrives, and cheaper media costs, shooting RAW all the time is a viable alternative. On my last trip to Vegas, I shot about 80% RAW and am glad, because I too was able to save some "cock-ups".
LOG IN TO REPLY |
flying... Member  115 posts Joined Jun 2006 More info | Dec 17, 2006 07:27 | #17 wat can i say...AMAZING. Yes just got my extreme3 2gig. So i'll give it a real try. haha. tq for sharing!!! Leave some comments on my flickr, PLEASE. Thanks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
djsin Member 68 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: quebec canada More info | Dec 17, 2006 15:05 | #18 yes , thanks for sharing... but personnaly i cannot afford to process 3-400 raw files everytime i go somewhere....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1687 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
thx again 