I have the Kata R-103, and i love it. But i've been buying lenses and other things, and i've outgrew it.
are the bigger kata bags, just as comfortable as that one? if not, what other bags are like the kata, just with more space?
thanks.
awad Goldmember 1,067 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Philadelphia More info | Dec 16, 2006 14:45 | #1 I have the Kata R-103, and i love it. But i've been buying lenses and other things, and i've outgrew it. are the bigger kata bags, just as comfortable as that one? if not, what other bags are like the kata, just with more space? thanks. http://www.redfieldphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 16, 2006 15:17 | #2 I've tried some larger Lowepro backpacks that will hold quite a bit more gear and don't prefer them in terms of comfort compared to the R-103. The Kata just feels right loaded up and carries the weight well. If you have a camera shop local to you, I'd go try on a bigger backpack with all your stuff and see what it feels like. That's the only way to know for sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Dec 17, 2006 08:57 | #3 I have the KAta R102 which is the same bag without the laptop slot. I have the same issue as I wanted to be able to carry more gear. I bought the Kata W-92, which attaches to the R-102 or the R103. It can also be removed and used as either a shoulder bag or as a waist bag. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Dec 17, 2006 08:59 | #4 I can put my 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, and my 580EX, plus assorted bits and bobs in the W-92, freeing up a great deal of space in the R-102. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EOSAddict Book Committee Immortal 6,091 posts Likes: 17 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Preston, Lancashire, England More info | Dec 17, 2006 09:27 | #5 Don't forget to look at the HB -205 or 207s. I would definately have a bigger KATA when I get more stuff than my 1043 will take. Doc's idea has merit too, very flexible! But lowepro nature and pro trekker AW IIs look pretty good too. Al
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 18, 2006 12:32 | #6 that w-92 looks like a great solution, few questions though: http://www.redfieldphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 18, 2006 13:16 | #7 nevermind. ordered it. http://www.redfieldphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Dec 18, 2006 14:41 | #8 awad wrote in post #2416066 that w-92 looks like a great solution, few questions though: is it big enough to fit a 70-200mm f/2.8 or a 24-70 f/2.8 in the main section, if so; can i use it to work out of at a wedding or something? because i usually take another empty shoulder bag that i keep one of those lenses in. The 24-70 does, but not the 70-200. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Dec 18, 2006 14:42 | #9 awad wrote in post #2416215 nevermind. ordered it. I think you will like it. I realy like mine and it is extremely handy. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 20, 2006 14:59 | #10 the 70-200 does fit in the main compartment with all the dividers taken out, which is exactly what i wanted. but how do you connect this to the main bag? http://www.redfieldphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 21, 2006 09:58 | #11 The reason why I went with Kata for my equipment solution from the beginning is not just because they build super quality products, but because you can simply add your bags as your equipment grows. Here's what I mean:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 21, 2006 11:06 | #12 agreed. i connected them using the clips that come with the r103, but it kind of flops forward, then i noticed the extra connections that rklepper added, and it makes it more sttable. http://www.redfieldphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 21, 2006 11:06 | #13 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is EBiffany 1162 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||