Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 17 Dec 2006 (Sunday) 05:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2x Converter trial - not too happy, any ideas?

 
butcha27
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Dec 17, 2006 05:19 |  #1

These few pics are a couple from my 1st full outing with my Teleplus MC7 teleconverter on my 400D with my 75-300mm f4 - 5.6, The pics seem very "soft" The few i didnt use it for on the day actually turned out better cropped then the uncropped 2x ones. Any ideas or solutions? Or should I just put it back on Ebay? Auto focus doesnt really work, which doesn't concern me but the picture quality appears to be suffering greatly. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated. The pictures attatched are all uncropped and totally untouched in terms of post production. Please help!!!? :confused:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butcha27
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Dec 17, 2006 05:22 |  #2

more..............:)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butcha27
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Dec 17, 2006 05:24 as a reply to  @ butcha27's post |  #3

and finally 2 more ........... :D


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sir ­ Vic ­ Alsmear
Member
186 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Manchester, England
     
Dec 17, 2006 05:34 |  #4

I had one of these and I wasn't happy either. I put it on Ebay and traded up to the Sigma TC, which I find works great with my 300 2.8L. Still tempted to try the Canon though.


Photographer to Bury Football Club

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cwphoto
Go ahead, make my day
Avatar
2,167 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia
     
Dec 17, 2006 06:14 as a reply to  @ Sir Vic Alsmear's post |  #5

I think that's about the best you can hope for out of that combo unfortunately.


EOS-1D X Mark II| EOS 5D Mark IV | EOS 80D | EOS-1V HS
L: 14/2.8 II | 17/4 | 24/1.4 II | 24/3.5 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 100/2.8 Macro IS | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 300/2.8 IS III | 400/2.8 IS III | 500/4 IS III | 600/4 IS III | 8-15/4 Fisheye | 11-24/4 | 16-35/2.8 III | 24-70/2.8 II | 70-200/2.8 IS III | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS II | 200-400/4 IS 1.4x
Sundry: 430EX III-RT | 600EX II-RT | 1.4x III | 2x III | 12 II | 25 II | OC-E4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jubilee32
Senior Member
455 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Dec 17, 2006 06:35 |  #6

Seems to me most of problems are around exposure selection. Everything seems dulled out - no faces and no details. I would work on that before you throw out 2X


So much "stuff" - so little time

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CatchingUp
Goldmember
Avatar
1,842 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 406
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Texas
     
Dec 17, 2006 08:09 |  #7

Can't speak from experiene, but everything I've read/heard suggest users are much happier with the 1.4.


Tony
I use Canon gear...have several bodies and lenses and am quite pleased with them.

"A person's gift will make room for itself."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
Avatar
3,939 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2004
Location: NE England.
     
Dec 17, 2006 08:14 |  #8

AF isn't going to happen i'm afraid. With the TC fitted your lens becomes f8 at best and the 400D AF won't work on a lens with a max. aperture of f5.6 or greater.

Added to that the 75-300 isn't the world's greatest lens to start with and you're asking a bit too much.


Geoff www.bhppix.co.uk (external link)
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butcha27
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Dec 17, 2006 10:16 |  #9

Jubilee32 wrote in post #2410801 (external link)
Seems to me most of problems are around exposure selection. Everything seems dulled out - no faces and no details. I would work on that before you throw out 2X

Not sure exactly what settings you'd suggest? These were as shar[as I could seem to manage. The pic I've attatched is one I've aharpened on photoshop. But I'd love any in camera suggestions Jubilee? Thanks :)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Dec 17, 2006 10:50 |  #10

I agree with GSH. You need a lens with a very high IQ to begin with.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Dec 17, 2006 18:32 |  #11

Dan-o wrote in post #2411429 (external link)
I agree with GSH. You need a lens with a very high IQ to begin with.

hell, you need an f2.8 lens to begin with... if you want the 140-600mm, get a superzoom point and shoot, or buy an f2.8 lens like teh sigma 120-300. if not, you're not going to get much out of having an slr over a point and shoot:rolleyes:


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lakiluno
slightly jealous
Avatar
2,895 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland)
     
Dec 18, 2006 10:10 |  #12

what is "Teleplus" - is that some no-name brand or am I missing something.

Anyway. The 75-300 is known to be soft above 200mm on its own, and a telconverter simply amplifies that. If you truly want to use a 2x teleconverter with AF, then you need a lens at f/2.8 for your camera, or f/4 for a 1 series (they AF at f/8)

Your asking too much of the lens.

I also noticed you shot in the sports mode. The first thing you should do is understand how exposure works and get out of the auto modes. Shoot Av or Tv for this kind of thing. It gives you more control, allows you to shoot RAW if you want and it allows much more control of ISO's etc.


Leo
20D|Tamron 17-50 2.8|Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro|50 1.8|Sigma EF-500 DG Super|
My Photo Gallery (external link) *New* | My Gear List | Backup Photos Easily with Robocopy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Dec 18, 2006 11:59 |  #13

Given the combo you had for the photos, I think you did pretty good actually. 2x is just no good on a zoom lens no matter what brand, in my opinion.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
Avatar
3,939 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2004
Location: NE England.
     
Dec 18, 2006 12:05 |  #14

SYS wrote in post #2415966 (external link)
Given the combo you had for the photos, I think you did pretty good actually. 2x is just no good on a zoom lens no matter what brand, in my opinion.

Really ? :rolleyes:


Geoff www.bhppix.co.uk (external link)
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Dec 18, 2006 12:22 |  #15

GSH wrote in post #2415990 (external link)
Really ? :rolleyes:


Like I said, it's just my opinion -- based on my experience using the 2x on my 70-200 f/2.8 non-IS. With the 2x on my 100-400, with the IS turned on and on a monopod, the combo seems to yield better results, but I wouldn't use the combo for any fast action sports shots.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,778 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
2x Converter trial - not too happy, any ideas?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2013 guests, 98 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.