Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 17 Dec 2006 (Sunday) 15:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Monopod head- which one??

 
Treat ­ me ­ like ­ a ­ tourist
Goldmember
Avatar
1,614 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 60
Joined Oct 2005
Location: North Wales
     
Dec 17, 2006 15:45 |  #1

Hi, i have a monfrotto monopod, and at the present time i simply screw the pod into my camera. Ideally i should have a head, but i dont know which one- i put a question out on the forum in the summer about tripods and heads, i didnt buy one as i later found out i couldnt afford it.i was given the recommendation of a monfrotto ball head 488RC2 that cost £70- would this be too expensive for a monopod?

Any thoughts and recommendations would be most welcome.


Facebook (external link)
Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearLeeAlive
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Dec 17, 2006 15:47 |  #2

486RC2 would be just fine, that is what I bought and is by far the most recommended on these forums.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 17, 2006 15:49 |  #3

The 488RC2 is a little heavy for a monopod, and the panning release is virtually useless on a monopod. I use the 488RC2 on a portable tripod (3021BPro) but use the 486RC2 on my 680B monopod. The 486RC2 seems just about perfect on the monopod.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Treat ­ me ­ like ­ a ­ tourist
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,614 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 60
Joined Oct 2005
Location: North Wales
     
Dec 17, 2006 15:53 |  #4

Thank you both.

Skip i think it was you who recommended that head to me but for the tripod.
I see that my local store has the 486rc2 in stock- but with a quiicke release plate, can this plate be used with the 488rc2?

Many thanks again for your help.


Facebook (external link)
Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearLeeAlive
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Dec 17, 2006 15:57 |  #5

The 486RC2 does come with a quick release. This release is the same as the 488RC2 so the camera or lenses the plates are mounted on can be attached to, or detached from, the ballhead quickly. I would definitely recommend this.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Treat ­ me ­ like ­ a ­ tourist
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,614 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 60
Joined Oct 2005
Location: North Wales
     
Dec 17, 2006 15:59 |  #6

thanks bear- good news, hopefully when i do get round to buying the 488 i will have two plates, an excuse to buy a new camera lol

Thanks for your help.


Facebook (external link)
Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 17, 2006 16:19 |  #7

All Bogen/Manfrotto heads with the ...RC2 suffix use the same quick-release plate family.

There are different ...RC2 quick release plates that one can buy. They are available with 1/4-20 and 3/8-16 mounting screws and with or without a lip to keep the camera body from rotating in "portrait" position. I have never found the need for the ones with the lip.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ K
Goldmember
Avatar
1,637 posts
Joined Apr 2001
Location: San Francisco area
     
Dec 17, 2006 22:58 |  #8

Treat me like a tourist wrote in post #2412395 (external link)
Hi, i have a monfrotto monopod, and at the present time i simply screw the pod into my camera.
Any thoughts and recommendations would be most welcome.

How heavy of a lens and camera are you planning on using, now or in the future? Most folks only use monopods for fairly heavy gear. In this case the lens foot is normally attached to the monopod, not the camera.

The most important question is what are you going to be shooting with your monopod? Most folks who shoot sports usually don't use a head, just put a Arca Swill style clamp right on the monopod. This is because most sports happen in two dimensions and they can pan left to right by rotating the monopod. However, birders have to pan vertically, so they need something that will rotate upwards. Here is a picture of a simple Bogen 3232 with an AS style clamp.
http://www.reallyright​stuff.com/tutorials/mo​nopods/index.html (external link)
I have a birder friend that uses a Wimberley Sidekick with the bogen set up above, and it works great for a large lens like a 500 f4 with 1.4X TC on a 20D. The sidekick facilitates good neutral balance and gimbal action and allows easy upwards/downwards rotations to follow bird movements.
Mike K


Canon 6D, 1DmkII, IR modified 5DII with lots of Canon L, TSE and Zeiss ZE lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Treat ­ me ­ like ­ a ­ tourist
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,614 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 60
Joined Oct 2005
Location: North Wales
     
Dec 18, 2006 15:42 |  #9

biggest lens that i would use would be the 70-200f4 hardly a heavy lens, this would only be at an airshow, really it would be used for low light environments for primes- just to get a higher iso without suffering shake, maybe some birding but i think i lack the length in my lenses to do that, i think what skip has advsied is the right choice for me, thank you all for your help.


Facebook (external link)
Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rklepper
Dignity-Esteem-Compassion
Avatar
9,019 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2003
Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA.
     
Dec 18, 2006 23:15 |  #10

SkipD wrote in post #2412414 (external link)
The 488RC2 is a little heavy for a monopod, and the panning release is virtually useless on a monopod. I use the 488RC2 on a portable tripod (3021BPro) but use the 486RC2 on my 680B monopod. The 486RC2 seems just about perfect on the monopod.

Yes, the 486RC2 is perfect.


Doc Klepper in the USA
I
am a photorealist, I like my photos with a touch of what was actually there.
Polite C&C always welcome, Thanks. Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2005GLI
Goldmember
Avatar
1,857 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 291
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Jersey
     
Dec 19, 2006 01:11 |  #11

i bought the 482 thinking it was going to be ok. In the pics on b&h's site it looks so much bigger. When i got it, i was like this thing wont support the sigma 70-200. i think i'll get the 486rc2 now that i've seen some pics of it.


|Canon 80D|40D backup|24-105 F4/L|Sigma 70-200 F/2.8|Sigma 150-500 C|
|Tokina 12-24|Sigma 8mm Fisheye|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Loesje
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Europe, Belgium
     
Dec 25, 2006 07:59 |  #12

Hello,

I'm planning to buy a Manfrotto 681B with a 234RC Monopod Head.
Following the specs., the maximum load for this head is 2,5 kg. and it would just support my 30D with grip and a sigma 70-200 2.8, but would it also support a 300mm 2.8?
Anyone using this 234RC and what lens (weight) do you have on it?
Would you advice a 234RC or a larger ballhead instead?

I will also buy a tripod with 488RC2 which has the same plate: 200PL-14. I could use this head for the monopod too but I prefer not changing the head all the time.

Thanks for your advice!

Loes




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,646 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Monopod head- which one??
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1470 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.