Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Dec 2006 (Sunday) 21:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Defective Camera?

 
nathanmock
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 17, 2006 21:43 |  #1

I just purchased a 30d, but it seems really noisy and a couple of my pictures are exhibiting wierd artifacts in this case the hair where my 350d didn't seem to do...this was only shot at iso640

I was wondering if I got a defective 30d and if i should return it for a different one or if it's just a matter of technique. thanks

http://www.aberrant.us​/pics/defective.jpg (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Dec 17, 2006 21:44 |  #2

well i think you should take a pic thats actually exposed properly and in focus before you judge its ISO noise


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Dec 18, 2006 00:43 |  #3

The pic is way under exposed. what is noisy? the shutter? There is no way around that with a SLR. Welcome to potn. If you could be more specific, I am sure we can help.


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scrumpy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,664 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Dorset, England
     
Dec 18, 2006 02:03 |  #4

1/13 sec @ f22/!! Not too bad for that exposure.


David: Canon EOS 400D - Canon EF70-300mm f/4-55.6 IS USM -Sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.5 DC Macro - Sigma 50-500 'Bigma' - Speedlite 580EX 11 - Better Beamer
Have patience. All things are difficult before they become easy ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jman13
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,567 posts
Likes: 164
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Dec 18, 2006 05:49 |  #5

f/22 for a portrait...there's a new style of shooting! :)


Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephot​os.com (external link) | https://www.admiringli​ght.com (external link)
---------------
Canon EOS R5 | R6 | TTArtisan 11mm Fisheye | Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 | RF 24-105mm f/4L IS | Tamron 35mm f/1.4 | RF 35mm f/1.8 | RF 50mm f/1.8 | RF 85mm f/2 | RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | Sigma 135mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Dec 18, 2006 06:14 |  #6

Nathan,

welcome to the forum :D!

As you have certainly learned from others' (maybe a bit harsh :wink: ) reactions, the settings for the image you have posted are far from optimal for judging whether the camera is working properly.

Which shooting mode and settings do you normally use on your 350D?
Try to start with something that you are familiar with - and not exactly under such challenging conditions.
Try to get the same image with the same aperture/exposure on your 350D and compare the results. They should actually be nearly undistinguishable, as the sensors of the 350D and 30D are nearly alike.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask here on the forum.
Normally, the lot here is quite friendly and helpful.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michael
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,981 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
     
Dec 18, 2006 06:14 |  #7

HUH? When I look at the EXIF it shows f/2.2 ant f/22.


Michael

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Dec 18, 2006 06:17 |  #8

BreezeBrowser shows me 50 mm, 1/13 and f/2.2 ... which seems to me a 'normal' setting for taking a very low light image with the 50/1.8.

Try to take an image under 'normal conditions' ... this would be more appropriate for judging camera quality.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Dec 18, 2006 06:55 |  #9

ISO 640 - Fairly High, this will introduce a bit of noise.
1/13th sec - Slow shutter speed would account for the blur.
f/2.2 - Almost wide open so fairly shallow depth of field.

A typical indoor shot with not enough light :-(

The image looks underexposed so at ISO640 will show a fair bit of noise - As others have said take a test image in good daylight.


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,131 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Defective Camera?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2532 guests, 90 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.