Lin-z Goldmember  1,247 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: GA More info | Dec 21, 2006 13:15 | #1 I had a wedding six hours away from home last weekend. Here are a few of my favorites. Just wanted to share. Comments are welcomed.  2  Now I know most of you guys hate the fake blur effect, BUT I did this because the background was kinda.... well yuck.... so I will post the before and after.. AFTER 3  BEFORE 4 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
carbonXevo8 Senior Member 370 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Long island, New york More info | Dec 21, 2006 14:43 | #2 |
BrittanyElise Member  65 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: I reside in Charlotte, NC, but my home is in Florida! More info | Dec 21, 2006 15:53 | #3 The last image is beautiful. The ability to capture the inner beauty of a soul is the essence of a true photographer. For anyone can capture outward adornment, but who can capture the inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is precious in God's sight?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonyfanning Senior Member  834 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Colwyn Bay,North Wales, UK More info | Dec 21, 2006 16:04 | #4 I like the "after" shot! Looks like you used a "lens babies" to get the blur. Regards, Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 21, 2006 19:26 | #5 tony fanning wrote in post #2430611  I like the "after" shot! Looks like you used a "lens babies" to get the blur. I bet the couple will love it. number 1 is pretty cool as well. I processed the images with lightroom, and then created the blur effect, and the tone with picasa.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Dec 21, 2006 20:25 | #6 #1 has great colors, and I WAY prefer the "before" shot Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rellik Senior Member  720 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Dec 21, 2006 21:03 | #7 I like the before shot as well. Mainly for the colors with the sunsetting. I would try a vertical crop to cut out the twigs coming out from the front side. -Derek 40D, 5D, 5D MK II, 1D Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jessiper EEK! I don't want a title anymore!  2,067 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Portland, OR USA More info | Dec 22, 2006 00:31 | #8 Definitely the before shot. It doesn't look "yucky" at all, silly. *Gear: 5D Mark II, 2 5D's, 30D, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, 24mmL 1.4, 45mm TS-E, 16-35mmL 2.8 II, 70-200L 2.8 IS, 100mm 2.8 macro, 15mm 2.8 fisheye, 580EXII, 580EX, 430EX, AB 800, AB Ring flash, lots of PW's, stands, umbrellas, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
strmrdr Goldmember  1,853 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Dec 22, 2006 03:07 | #9 I think the before shot is 10x better than the after. .....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim1960 Senior Member 689 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2006 Location: Hartwell, Georgia More info | Dec 22, 2006 05:45 | #10 I like the before shot also. Where was the wedding? T. Gray
LOG IN TO REPLY |
th3r0m Senior Member 778 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Papillion, NE More info | Dec 22, 2006 06:05 | #11 I also like the before shot, although rather than a vertical crop as suggested, I would try to clone out that mess of sticks in the middle. It looks like the background behind it is pretty homogeneous and/or easily cloned, but I am at work and can't get a real good look. Great photos Ben
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy  8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Dec 22, 2006 11:07 | #12 Whoa! I recently shot a bride with the exact same dress! It's an uncommon design as it's got colour on it. What a coincidence! -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jessiper EEK! I don't want a title anymore! 2,067 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Portland, OR USA More info | Dec 22, 2006 12:33 | #13 picturecrazy wrote in post #2433804 Whoa! I recently shot a bride with the exact same dress! It's an uncommon design as it's got colour on it. What a coincidence! Anyhow, nice captures! But I too like the before shot. I just looked at a friend of a friend's wedding pics from August, and she had the same dress as well. *Gear: 5D Mark II, 2 5D's, 30D, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, 24mmL 1.4, 45mm TS-E, 16-35mmL 2.8 II, 70-200L 2.8 IS, 100mm 2.8 macro, 15mm 2.8 fisheye, 580EXII, 580EX, 430EX, AB 800, AB Ring flash, lots of PW's, stands, umbrellas, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 22, 2006 15:48 | #14 The wedding was in Calhoun GA. It was an at home wedding, in a living room. The house was in a big neighborhood so I to them to a local park for these.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 22, 2006 15:51 | #15 Here is another from that same place  Here is some dress detail, just to see if it is truly the same dress.... I hope that more brides start getting color in their dresses, I really like it. 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1418 guests, 113 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
