Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Performing Arts 
Thread started 23 Dec 2006 (Saturday) 17:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How much color correction is too much for performing arts pictures?

 
bmoguy
Senior Member
472 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Branson, MO
     
Dec 23, 2006 17:31 |  #1

Learning to use PS and PP for photos has been fun, but has also left me with a few (probably dumb) questions expecially related to concert shots. Whenever I read about PP I always see sections on color correction and removing color casts. When shooting shows with colored lighting there is generally a cast. Should I be trying to remove it or lessen it? An example from the Chinese Acrobats show I posted previously:

1. Lots of red light during this segment. This is pretty true to what was seen:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


2. This is what I actually posted which had the red lessened:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Would the first one have been the better one to have posted? Or will it just depend on the show?

Thanks

Basil
gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
narlus
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,671 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Andover, MA
     
Dec 23, 2006 18:13 |  #2

i think it all comes to down to personal preference (or client preference). personally, i like the 2nd one.

if there's obvious non-normal lighting (blue or green lights), i tend to leave 'em in. if it's flooded w/ red, i tend to B&W them. i do white balance adjustments, though, so i guess i tend to correct for color a lot.


www.tinnitus-photography.com (external link)
Facebook link (external link)

gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Dec 23, 2006 20:19 |  #3

Keep in mind that lighting design is part of the art being performed. Colored lighting is used for a reason. In a well-designed show, it is part of a carefully coordinated effort to integrate the lighting with the costumes, set pieces, backdrops, etc.

Our brains try to compensate for the effects of colored gels, so the image captured by the camera will often be much more dramatic than what we see live.

When I do theatre, my usual approach is to set the camera on tungsten and not mess with the color. I have plenty of other things to worry about, and I deliver hundreds of images with a few days' turnaround. There is little point in trying to make the colors look "natural" when it was never intended to look that way.

Of the two images above, I like the first one better.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alan_potter
wireless groping system
Avatar
2,408 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 658
Joined May 2005
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
     
Dec 24, 2006 06:12 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #4

A very interesting discussion point. I suspect that there is no "right" or "wrong" answer here, it's more an issue of personal preference.

There will be differences depending on what type of event you are shooting - what is appropriate for a classical ballet will be wrong for a rock concert. And even within a single show, different scenes will call for different effects. You may want to correct for excessive colour in the lighting for a love duet, where the red may well be appropriate for the scene containing the descent into Hades!

In the case you show, I prefer the second picture. But I am aware that when I take show photos and correct them for colour, I am quite often unhappy that I seem to have excessively washed-out photographs. I am hoping to get the Margulis book that Rutt recommends for my Christmas, maybe that will help me :)

I am very impressed with the colour accuracy of the postings that Curtis has made - were they really just shot in JPG with Tungsten colour balance? The skin tones look very good.

regards,
/alan


Falkirk, Scotland.
Project 365 Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 24, 2006 06:19 |  #5

The lighting director/coordinator would really hate you if you presented that second one to him/her. They work really hard to get the lighting just right for the performance.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alan_potter
wireless groping system
Avatar
2,408 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 658
Joined May 2005
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
     
Dec 24, 2006 06:23 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #6

But they aim to get it right for the eye, surely - the camera presents things differently, otherwise we wouldn't need colour balance control!

regards,
/alan


Falkirk, Scotland.
Project 365 Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 24, 2006 06:29 |  #7

alan_potter wrote in post #2440620 (external link)
But they aim to get it right for the eye, surely - the camera presents things differently, otherwise we wouldn't need colour balance control!

regards,
/alan

OP said the first one is as it appeared in person.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alan_potter
wireless groping system
Avatar
2,408 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 658
Joined May 2005
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
     
Dec 24, 2006 06:38 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #8

Fair enough... But I'd still say that I would prefer to look at #2, because of the more believable skin tones.

regards,
/alan


Falkirk, Scotland.
Project 365 Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
18,385 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 2457
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
     
Dec 24, 2006 07:22 |  #9

If you see that color design of the show is consistent and supports the performance (like theater and opera most of the time) then why not put an effort to preserve the "correct" color. If you see that live light mixer just uses all the gadgets he has to create an impression of energy and movement then the light color in the actual 1/500 sec moment does not matter, what matters is that the color supports the captured image.

If client requests accurate lights then you show accurate lights.


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.5 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ E
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
     
Dec 24, 2006 07:38 |  #10

I definitely like #2 better (the corrected one). I think the overly red skin on #1 bugs me. When the skin tones are brought back to a more normal color, I think it is more appealing.


John Elser
Canon 5D MK II; 30D; EF 85 f/1.8; EF 70-200L f/2.8 IS II; EF 24-105L f/4; EF 135L f/2; EF 24-70L; Canon 580 EX II(x3).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
livewire-photography.com
Goldmember
Avatar
1,665 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Cheltenham
     
Dec 24, 2006 07:59 |  #11

not to be a pain lol, but i think somewhere in the middle of them both woud be cool, maybe just a bit more color on there clothes?
James...


James....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dtrayers
Goldmember
Avatar
1,063 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Denmark Township, MN, USA
     
Dec 24, 2006 08:55 |  #12

I shoot the same as Curtis; I set the camera (or ACR) to tungsten. I find the colors are more accurate to the performance and the intent of the lighting designer. With so many lighting changes, you should choose a baseline and stick with it throughout the performance. I've found that tungsten works well to correct for the source of the light, so any gel placed in front of the source will render correctly in the camera.


-Dave

http://www.trayersphot​ography.com (external link)

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
livewire-photography.com
Goldmember
Avatar
1,665 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Cheltenham
     
Dec 24, 2006 09:50 |  #13

when iv shot in tungsten (and this is in a night club, so i dunno if it would be the same) i found th skin color to be a very light blue kinda Zombie looking skin if that makes sence?? is there any reason why it wuld be different? as you say you shoot in tungsten.
Cheers
James....


James....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dtrayers
Goldmember
Avatar
1,063 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Denmark Township, MN, USA
     
Dec 24, 2006 11:41 |  #14

livewire-photography.com wrote in post #2441017 (external link)
when iv shot in tungsten (and this is in a night club, so i dunno if it would be the same) i found th skin color to be a very light blue kinda Zombie looking skin if that makes sence?? is there any reason why it wuld be different? as you say you shoot in tungsten.
Cheers
James....

Part of the problem is that your eye and brain are very good at adjusting white balance, so your perception of the color will probably be different from the photo. So in changing lighting conditions, what is the 'correct' color? One answer is, "whatever looks good to you". Another would be, "what the camera sees." I choose the latter. But how to identfy what "white" is? I rely on the tungsten setting on the camera. Tungsten compensates for the color of the lighting source (the actual light bulb).

Here are two examples. Both images are the extracted JPG's from a recent performance and the WB in-camera was set to tungsten. The first image had strong red lighting but the second image was taken later in the performance when the lighting changed to a bluish-white.
Both these images accurately reflect the lighting at the time they were taken. Both are straight from the camera and only down-sized for the web. These photos are from a dance entitled "Peel Session", choreographed and performed by Ryan Dean.

IMAGE: http://www.trayersphotography.com/share/kinetic/img_4363_std.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.trayersphotography.com/share/kinetic/img_4387_std.jpg

-Dave

http://www.trayersphot​ography.com (external link)

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmb
Senior Member
Avatar
808 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland
     
Dec 24, 2006 12:30 |  #15

I "correct" the colors of my concert photos in the way I see fit for the mood and/or content of the photo. Sometimes I do extreme color adjustment by removing all the color to create a black and white photo, much like was done some hundered years ago :).

To me, a great concert photo communicates something, and if I can help it by adjustment (typically color temperature, contrast/general curves adjustment and saturation), I do it.


- Kalle
Bjorklid.net (external link) -
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,685 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
How much color correction is too much for performing arts pictures?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Performing Arts 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
813 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.