Hope I got this right, this is my first attempt at showing a picture. I chose the title for obvious reasons, this rose is in its last stages. Suggestions please.
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
CrazyCanuck Member More info | Feb 17, 2004 21:37 | #1 Hope I got this right, this is my first attempt at showing a picture. I chose the title for obvious reasons, this rose is in its last stages. Suggestions please.
Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Feb 17, 2004 22:47 | #2 Nice image, nice composition.. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dawg Member 76 posts Joined Feb 2004 More info | Feb 17, 2004 22:59 | #3 As said above, correct for washout and maybe use a smaller aperature to get a little more depth of field. It would help if some of the green was in focus.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ecobo Senior Member 580 posts Likes: 6 Joined Feb 2004 Location: Bulgaria More info | Feb 18, 2004 07:49 | #4 It would be nice if the light was much more softer. And yet it's a good photo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Warman Senior Member 363 posts Joined Aug 2003 More info | Feb 18, 2004 10:26 | #5 Dawg wrote: As said above, correct for washout and maybe use a smaller aperature to get a little more depth of field. I would have to disagree with that, i think the DOF is good and i would even like less if possible. The reason why i believe, you would like more DOF is because forms can clearly be seen in the background which are distracting and because of that you would like them sharper, they bother you being so identifiable but at the same time so blurred. That is however, closely tied with the overuse of light. If this would have been shot with the correct light, you would view the DOF as perfect with the background looking very undistracting. Just mho. http://warman.lusiarte.net/gallery LusiARTE - My gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dawg Member 76 posts Joined Feb 2004 More info | Feb 18, 2004 12:25 | #6 Warman wrote: Dawg wrote: As said above, correct for washout and maybe use a smaller aperature to get a little more depth of field. I would have to disagree with that, i think the DOF is good and i would even like less if possible. The reason why i believe, you would like more DOF is because forms can clearly be seen in the background which are distracting and because of that you would like them sharper, they bother you being so identifiable but at the same time so blurred. That is however, closely tied with the overuse of light. If this would have been shot with the correct light, you would view the DOF as perfect with the background looking very undistracting. Just mho. The focus I am looking for is the bud base and the stem the rose sits on. I don't have any problem with the blurred background (maybe more blur as you said).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2004 16:03 | #7 Could I get a suggestion on what type of equipment you would use and the settings. Being a real newbie I just used my camera as it came with the flash and all. I have a digital rebel, 18-55 stock lense and the built in flash. Thanks for the comments so far, glad I found this forum. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kell Member 51 posts Joined Feb 2004 More info | Feb 18, 2004 16:50 | #8 Well, if shooting so close, you could try using no flash at all, and increase the exposure time if it needs be. Even if the shot turns out too dark, the colour data will still be there, and you'll be able to brighten it in post-processing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2004 18:57 | #9 OK, this picture has a overhead light on with no flash and set on Av mode. The flower is wilting even more now. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Feb 18, 2004 20:59 | #10 This is a technical improvement. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1327 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||