Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 25 Dec 2006 (Monday) 14:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Macro, Closeup +7, Closeup +10

 
Photo_Newbie
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 25, 2006 14:41 |  #1

Okay . . . I'm a little confused about something. What's the difference between a Macro filter (the kind that frequently come with Wide Angle lenses) and a Closeup +10 filter? I thought that a +10 and a Macro were the same, but I've seen them both sometimes in listings on things . . . are they the same? I'm looking at one set of lenses that come with a 2x teleconverter, a .5 wide, and a closeup +7 and a closeup +10. I was also looking at a set that had a 2x tele, .45 wide, and the other lens included was just listed as a "macro." I wasn't sure whether or not it had a +number.

Also . . . I'm debating between a .5x wide and a .45 wide, does anyone have any example pictures showing just how far of a difference there is? I also hear the photo quality is horrible using a wide converter . . . is that true? I know you'll get a lot of shape distortion but that can be corrected pretty easily in Paint Shop Pro or Photoshop. I know PSP has a special feature for it, not sure about PS. But yeah . . . how bad is the image quality?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 25, 2006 16:58 |  #2

A +10 closeup lens is getting down into the macro range, depending on what lens you use it on. On a 100 mm or longer lens it'll let you get to and beyond life size. +7's less strong.

Unless you're planning to use the wide adapters on a camera that doesn't support interchangeable lenses, I'd say that they'll both be pretty poor. But quality will be influenced by who made the lenses as well as by the strength.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Photo_Newbie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 25, 2006 18:12 |  #3

I know that it's better to use actual wide lenses, but is the image quality really that bad on these wide converters? I've heard they're extremely blurry and don't produce good images.

How close could I get to something using a standard zoom (~35mm) using a +10? I've toyed around with +1, +2, and +4 a bit. I seemed to be able to get closer the further that I zoomed . . . but the way you described it, it seemed like I should be able to get closer with LESS zoom . . . as my SN shows, I'm totally new at photography, so maybe I'm understanding this a bit wrong.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 26, 2006 13:13 |  #4

Yes, it is - you'll commonly see horrible aberrations around the corners; cropping that out will get you back to where you were without the wide adapter, but with fewer pixels to work with.

The shorter a lens' f.l. is the greater the diopter (+1, +2, +4, +7, +10) you'll need to get to a given magnification. In general, with your camera's lens focussed at infinity you'll be able to focus at 1/diopter meters, so with a +1 on any lens you'll be focussed at 1 m; with a +10, at 10 cm (1/10 m). The longer the lens is the greater magnification you'll get at that given distance though.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,133 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Macro, Closeup +7, Closeup +10
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1939 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.