After looking at this for longer, it may not be large enough for the 17-55
foto202 Senior Member 751 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Va Beach More info | Dec 28, 2006 09:11 | #16 After looking at this for longer, it may not be large enough for the 17-55 Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Dec 28, 2006 12:12 | #17 AiGTs wrote in post #2453645 That's a nice bag, but I'm still looking for something even smaller. Would the Domke F-5XB bag fit my 20D with 17-55 lens w/o battery grip? Thanks! Yep. It takes my 5D with 24-105 or 24-70. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thank you for all your help guys. 20D • 24 2.8 • 85 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imitations Junior Member 20 posts Joined Nov 2006 More info | i had a lowepro offtrail 1. very small, fitted my 30d w/ 17-40mm JUST barely. fitted a 30d w/ 85mm f/1.8 snuggly, has 2 small comparments on the side that are removeable, u can put a water bottle or another lense there.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
axc09 Member 75 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: manchester,uk More info | I use a lowepro tz1 for my 20d and 17-85,i have to remove the lens hood to make it fit. It hangs nicely off the hip belt on my rucksack when hiking. or use the shoulder strap when needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1939 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||