Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 26 Dec 2006 (Tuesday) 21:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

SD 600 and too much flash?

 
Just ­ Be
Goldmember
Avatar
1,449 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Seattle area
     
Dec 26, 2006 21:57 |  #1

I bought my wife a SD 600 Canon for Christmas. Without a flash indoors it's great unless the subject is moving fast. But with a flash it's very very bright. I don't understand why. The histogram shows normal exposure with a flash, but everything is so blown out.

Has anyone else experienced this? Problem with my copy or standard for this model?

Maybe I'm just spoiled now that I have an XTi and a bounce flash.



6D, 60D, Various L and non-L Lenses and more gear than I have time to use. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Olegis
Goldmember
Avatar
2,073 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Israel
     
Dec 27, 2006 00:47 |  #2

An example would be helpful here - please help us to help you ;)


Best wishes,
Oleg.

www.Olegis.com (external link)
My equipment list
'I take orders from no one except the photographers' – Harry S Truman

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Myk249
Member
187 posts
Joined Aug 2003
     
Dec 27, 2006 05:41 |  #3

Also experiencing too much flash and cannot figure a way to reduce it. As I've already delted the bad pics I'll try to get one today and post also.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Just ­ Be
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,449 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Seattle area
     
Dec 27, 2006 13:03 as a reply to  @ Myk249's post |  #4

I just posted in another thread that I tried Teflon taped pressed onto an on board flash and it works better than I thought it would. No tape needed.



6D, 60D, Various L and non-L Lenses and more gear than I have time to use. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanteCaspian
Goldmember
1,103 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
     
Jan 13, 2007 21:41 |  #5

Can you not turn the flash level down a few notches?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Jan 13, 2007 23:35 |  #6

I haven't had this problem with my SD 600. Have you checked to make sure the exposure compensation setting is set to "0" ?


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Just ­ Be
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,449 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Seattle area
     
Jan 14, 2007 00:03 |  #7

JustShootin wrote in post #2537356 (external link)
=JustShootin';2537356]​I haven't had this problem with my SD 600. Have you checked to make sure the exposure compensation setting is set to "0" ?

It's at zero. A small piece of teflon tape diffuses the light very well. Also white medical tape works too. I wish there was a way to reduce the flash power like my XTi.



6D, 60D, Various L and non-L Lenses and more gear than I have time to use. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Jan 14, 2007 07:36 |  #8

Just Be wrote in post #2537440 (external link)
It's at zero. A small piece of teflon tape diffuses the light very well. Also white medical tape works too.

Sure, there's lots of ways to defuse the flash, but you shouldn't have to do that just to get a proper exposure. While all head on flash leaves something to be desired, youre SD 600 still shouldn't be washing out your pictures, even with no defuser.


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ S.
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Canada's Capital
     
Jan 14, 2007 08:41 as a reply to  @ JustShootin''s post |  #9

Does that model have a manual mode? I had problems in the start with my S3 blowing out pictures with the flash in M because I had not lowered the flash level. But on auto and most other settings it adjusts it itself.


...Thomas

Canon 40D w/ EF-S 17-85IS USM | 50 1.4 | 70-200 f4L | 580EX II
Olympus OM1 (1970)
Praktica FX3 (1957) w/ Westanar 2.8/50 & Takumar 4/50 (I miss you grandpa)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Jan 14, 2007 09:17 as a reply to  @ Thomas S.'s post |  #10

The SD 600 has what it calls a manual mode, but it gives you very little control. It does however have a exposure compensation setting in M mode. I just don't think the camera should wash out your photo unless the compensation is set to a + setting. Mine doesn't.


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Just ­ Be
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,449 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Seattle area
     
Jan 14, 2007 10:04 as a reply to  @ JustShootin''s post |  #11

I think my SD600's flash is a little hotter than my S2 was. I bought the SD600 after buying my XTi where I've been using bounce flash and diffusers.

So I'm a little spoiled with my DSLR being able to have more control with my 430 EX.

If the SD600 had a fllash adjustment all would be fine.

I'm not sure if sending the camera back to Canon would help much. Complaining that the flash is a little too powerful may not be something they can change. The flash is OK for wide angle and large group shots.

Again, it may just be that I'm too picky now that I have a much better camera and flash.

Seriously though...Even if my flash wasn't this powerful I'd still give the teflon tape or medical tape idea a try. It still lets the flash be the primary light source, but it looks more like shots taken in better light without the flash on. It's a very even look.

Give it a try!



6D, 60D, Various L and non-L Lenses and more gear than I have time to use. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustShootin'
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: South Florida
     
Jan 14, 2007 10:22 |  #12

Just Be wrote in post #2539020 (external link)
Even if my flash wasn't this powerful I'd still give the teflon tape or medical tape idea a try. It still lets the flash be the primary light source, but it looks more like shots taken in better light without the flash on. It's a very even look.

Give it a try!

I agree with you on that, Just Be. Even if the flash is wokring perfectly, some kind of defuser for head on flash always creates a better, softer image. I've used eveything you can think of to defuse head on flash over the years.


Gary
Canon SX40, S100 and a Non Canon dSLR
“Any darn fool can make something complex;
it takes a genius to make something simple.”—Pete Seeger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,825 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
SD 600 and too much flash?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1569 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.