Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 27 Dec 2006 (Wednesday) 18:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is there a shoulder bag that can actually hold this stuff??

 
Blue ­ S2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,352 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: US
     
Dec 28, 2006 11:18 |  #16

Yeah... I was experimenting with my stuff last night and this is a bit trickier than I thought.

I'm thinking a Tamrac phototrail backpack or similar and maybe a Pro Zoom pack combo might be more what I want. Carry it all in the backpack, and then just take out walking what I need specifically. I can attach two accesory pouches to that thing apparently. Maybe a second lens, and a flash?


Canon 5DmkII / Canon 5D / LifePixel IR 350D / L-glass
Brightscreen Screens & Mags / ReallyRightStuff gear / Singh-Ray filters
Read My Blog!! (external link) -- Visit My Website! : Ancient City Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearLeeAlive
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Dec 28, 2006 11:31 |  #17

Another that would work is what I use, the Domke J-803. It is very well constructed and would carry what you want and even more with the 2 huge front pockets. You would not want a larger bag, I am a 6' 210lb fairly fit guy and after a couple hours this thing full can get heavy, though the camera is usually out with one lens most of the time.

These pics are from when I got it a year ago. My kit has changed a bit but it still shows what can be carried. I have even carried a bit more than what is shown here.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


This is my 5'5" wife holding the bag.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
awad
Goldmember
Avatar
1,067 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
     
Dec 28, 2006 11:36 |  #18

check out the kata r-103 + w-92 or the t-212.

heres my r-103

IMAGE: http://www.johnawad.net/disorganized.jpg

thats a 5D+70-200 f/2.8, 50 1.8, 85 1.8, 24-70 f/2.8, 17-40 f/4, 430+580. in the backpack. not to mention my 15" powerbook in the back.

then you add the w-92 to the bottom:

IMAGE: http://www.johnawad.net/w923.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.johnawad.net/w922.jpg

i swing the w-92 to the front or the side when im shooting. so i can work out of it when im wearing it as a fanny pack. it'll hold my 70-200 f/2.8 in the main compartment.

http://www.redfieldpho​to.com (external link)
http://www.theredfield​blog.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 28, 2006 11:38 |  #19

jfrancho wrote in post #2452211 (external link)
Domke F-1X (external link).

Heck, the F-2 should take it, never mind the F-1X!

BearLeeAlive wrote in post #2454976 (external link)
Another that would work is what I use, the Domke J-803. It is very well constructed and would carry what you want and even more with the 2 huge front pockets. You would not want a larger bag, I am a 6' 210lb fairly fit guy and after a couple hours this thing full can get heavy, though the camera is usually out with one lens most of the time.

These pics are from when I got it a year ago. My kit has changed a bit but it still shows what can be carried. I have even carried a bit more than what is shown here.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by BearLeeAlive in
./showthread.php?p=245​4976&i=i236663855
forum: Canon Accessories


This is my 5'5" wife holding the bag.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by BearLeeAlive in
./showthread.php?p=245​4976&i=i20268532
forum: Canon Accessories

I'd have suggested the F-802 or F-803 except he has the grip on the 5D; that's going to make the body a bit too deep for one of those.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearLeeAlive
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Dec 28, 2006 13:01 |  #20

Jon wrote in post #2455018 (external link)
I'd have suggested the F-802 or F-803 except he has the grip on the 5D; that's going to make the body a bit too deep for one of those.

I have tried putting a grip on my 20D and did get it to work. It does bulge the bag out quite a bit, but the glory of a satchel is it does have this capability. The J-803 is a wee bit bigger that the F-803. 13.5x4.5x10 as opposed to 13x4x9. The depth can be exceeded by quite a bit, as can the height, just by adjusting the strap on the top flap.

Here is a catalogue of Domke bags (external link). I really looked hard before buying, the Billingham are likely the nicest, but not for the cost. The Crumplers have really bad colours of fuzzy (read dirt holding) interiors, though otherwise not too badly built. The Lowepro were not too bad either, I just never found one that would suit me as good. I did look at a bunch of others, just found the Domke's the best value.

I have drug my ballistic nylon Domke all over the place with almost no sign of wear.

Whatever shoulder bag you decide on, get a good padded solution for the shoulder strap to help cushion the load. I use a strap designed for a large fabric tool bag I have but do not use the strap with, this thing is meant for carrying 100lb bags and is great.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cathpah
Goldmember
Avatar
4,259 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Maine.
     
Dec 28, 2006 16:06 |  #21

jfrancho wrote in post #2452211 (external link)
Domke F-1X (external link).

yep, or possibly the f-2...however you wouldn't have a whole lot of room to expand your gear list.


Architecture (external link) | Fashion + Beauty (external link) | Travel (external link) | Mayhem (external link) | Instagram (external link)
tools of the trade
My name is Jeff, and I'm addicted to shadows in fashion and brights in architecture. "Hiiiiii Jeff."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blue ­ S2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,352 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: US
     
Dec 28, 2006 16:20 |  #22

Ok, I ordered the Pro Digital 9 holster from tamrac and a large lens case and and a medium pouch. I figure that will get me moving as compact as possible.

5D w/ grip and 24-105 w/ hood in the main compartment. 35L in the attached lens case, and flash in the attached pouch. Batteries/polarizer/ca​rds/etc... in the 2 pockets. I can live with that I think. I figure thats as much as I will generally want on me. And the toploading seems more accessible than some of the shoulder bags. I tried emptying my shoulder bag and just grabbing the 5D out and it wasn't fun with such a large lid flap.


Canon 5DmkII / Canon 5D / LifePixel IR 350D / L-glass
Brightscreen Screens & Mags / ReallyRightStuff gear / Singh-Ray filters
Read My Blog!! (external link) -- Visit My Website! : Ancient City Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MegaHurtz
Senior Member
Avatar
309 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: BC, Canada
     
Dec 28, 2006 16:24 |  #23

I am rocking the Tamrac Pro 12 currently, it should be more than enough to hold everything that you have... I keep 2 bodies, 2 lenses, flash, battery pack, extra batteries, chargers, flash cord, etc in my bag, with lots of room to spare.


Canon

20D | BG-E2 | 17-40 F4L | 70-200 F2.8L | 50 F1.8 | 580EX | 21 gigs of CF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jfrancho
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,341 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Dec 28, 2006 17:26 |  #24

Cathpah wrote in post #2456122 (external link)
yep, or possibly the f-2...however you wouldn't have a whole lot of room to expand your gear list.

I thought about recommending the F-2, but it didn't seem quite big enough. I have an F-6 and a few F-901 removable pockets - amazing the amount of junk you can fit in there. The thing I like most about canvas is that even with the inserts, it conforms with the equipment in the bag. Totally different from the Lowepros and Tamracs I had had previously.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Dec 28, 2006 17:42 |  #25

The Tamrac add-on accessory bags (lens and flash shapes) have huge 3" velcro backs. The flash holder I use also has a hefty velcro flap so the flash is very secure.

They're perfect for making your own Batman Utility belt. I've heard of people using a wide belted fanny-pack combined with these and putting the nick-nacks into the fanny-pack pouch.

So; a lens bag big enough for 24-105 and flash bag for the fanny pack belt, the cleaning kit, filters, etc, (whatever you need most handy), and even a smaller lens.

Then a shoulder bag for the rest.

I haven't used it, but like the idea of stuff being more secured and not swinging around so much - plus it's easier on the shoulder.

I also dislike having a backpack. Not convenient at all, and too easy to forget to zip all the way and dump $4000 all over the sidewalk.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 28, 2006 17:54 |  #26

I have the Lowepro Stealth Reporter 650 AW and have a 20D/grip, 16-35L, 24-70L, and a 70-200 f/2.8L IS - all with their hoods on (70-200 reversed) plus a LOT of other stuff - flash, meter, charger, cleaning equipment, and more. There's a place for a PC in the bag that I use for a full-sized (8.5x11 inch) gray card and a GretagMacBeth color chart as well as other flat items.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deadpass
Goldmember
Avatar
3,353 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: phoenix, az
     
Dec 28, 2006 18:02 |  #27

crumpler bazillion dollar home.


a camera
http://www.deadpass.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,528 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Is there a shoulder bag that can actually hold this stuff??
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2130 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.