Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 28 Dec 2006 (Thursday) 22:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

tripod for 350 with batt grip and heavy lense.....

 
nodoubt
Senior Member
452 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Dec 28, 2006 22:16 |  #1

my elcheapo sunpak is maxed out with my batt grip and new tam 28-75 lense......want to go ahead and buy a good tripod and be done with it, as ive been shooting more and more lately from a tripod....which one do i want to buy ?? no idea where to start....thanks in advance....


40d....
50mm 1.8...tamron 28-75... ef 70-300 IS ....EF 10-22
manfrotto 3021BPRO
linhof PROFI III ball head
wimberly quick release, with a kirk plate

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wolf
Senior Member
Avatar
738 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Alberta Canada
     
Dec 28, 2006 22:48 |  #2

An excellent tripod that wouldn't break the bank is the Manfrotto 3021 series (external link).



<> My Gear <>

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dicky109
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2003
Location: SC & NJ USA
     
Dec 29, 2006 00:02 as a reply to  @ wolf's post |  #3

Before you go out to purchase a tripod, you need to look at what you are doing with it and what is your budget. Is it only at home or on short trips? If so, you can probably get away with $150-$200 for tripod & head. Do you use it on long hikes and need something light? If that's the case, you can easily spend 3-4 times that or more. Do you need low to the ground capability? What camera do you have and how much weight will you need to carry on it?

Check out this sticky: http://www.photography​-on-the.net …highlight=choos​ing+tripod

Good luck


Rich B
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt"--Bertrand Russell

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DriftinS14
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 29, 2006 02:18 as a reply to  @ dicky109's post |  #4

Im not really sure why somebody would spend so much on a tripod. I just picked up a Sunpak 5800 for $28. It extends 59" and is adjustable in every way. It can be locked in all directions, comes with a nice head and two quick release bases, and even has levels.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ephemeral
Senior Member
Avatar
896 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK (London)
     
Dec 29, 2006 03:08 |  #5

DriftinS14 wrote in post #2458352 (external link)
Im not really sure why somebody would spend so much on a tripod. I just picked up a Sunpak 5800 for $28. It extends 59" and is adjustable in every way. It can be locked in all directions, comes with a nice head and two quick release bases, and even has levels.

I bet you think the 18-55 kit lens is on par with an L lens too eh?  :p

Seriously, you can argue that the top end tripods are over priced, but their quality over el-cheapo plastic "heck I can sell these for $28" tripods is very apparent. That said, if your $28 tripod fulfils your needs then to hell with all those $200 tripods. :D


Canon 5D + Grip | 85mm L f/1.2 | 17-40mm L f/4.0 | [COLOR=Silver]24-70mm L f/2.8 |[COLOR=Black] 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS | Speedlite 580EX & 430EX | Manfrotto 190Pro + 488RC2
ephemeral.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixel9ine
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Dec 29, 2006 03:10 |  #6

DriftinS14 wrote in post #2458352 (external link)
Im not really sure why somebody would spend so much on a tripod.

The main cost is finding a tripod that's BOTH Stable and Light. Cheap tripods can only be one of the above, never both.

For example, the tripod I use my SLRs on is stable enough (I've even used a 300 2.8 on it), but it sure ain't light. It's a pain to lug around all day, which is why I bought a monopod as an interim upgrade.


Andre B :: gearlist
www.pixel9ineexternal link.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Dec 29, 2006 03:20 as a reply to  @ Pixel9ine's post |  #7

I have two tripods one was expensive the other was very expensive! The very expensive one is also very big and heavy, occasionally when I don’t want to lug it around I take the lighter one and invariably when it comes to taking the pictures I wish I had brought the heavy one.

You can not get images like THIS (external link) with a light cheap tripod.


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angryhampster
"Got a thick monopod?"
Avatar
3,860 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2006
Location: Iowa
     
Dec 29, 2006 03:46 |  #8

DriftinS14 wrote in post #2458352 (external link)
Im not really sure why somebody would spend so much on a tripod. I just picked up a Sunpak 5800 for $28. It extends 59" and is adjustable in every way. It can be locked in all directions, comes with a nice head and two quick release bases, and even has levels.



I have that tripod. I can't wait to get rid of it. The legs are so thin and flimsy and the head doesn't like to stay put with a big lens on.


Steve Lexa
Iowa City Wedding Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Augiz
Junior Member
Avatar
21 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Dec 29, 2006 05:17 as a reply to  @ angryhampster's post |  #9

From the cheap but stable series, what about Velbon CX?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeMcL
Goldmember
Avatar
1,411 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Dayton Ohio
     
Dec 29, 2006 05:35 |  #10

There is little reason to go straight to the top of the price range, but get a nice one with a strong weight rated head. if it is rated for 10 or less pounds, skip it.

Check out dynatran tripods on ebay, they are good for around 100.00 and you can upgrade the head when you get into monster 30 pound lenses.

I have 3 tripods. I have a super light portable one, a super heavy studio one, and a middle one that mixes rock hard strength with portability.... as said above, consider your uses carefully. the bogen 3021 is highly recommended on forums, and my friend loves his, but i wasnt particularly impressed.


350d, 5d, 28-70L, 70-200L, 430EX,
50 1.8, 85 1.8 - full alienbees studio set.

MikeMcLane.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 29, 2006 06:18 |  #11

My tripod recommendation for general purpose use is the Bogen/Manfrotto 3021BPro (known as the 055ProB outside the U.S.) topped off with the Bogen/Manfrotto 488RC2 ball head.

This is a very sturdy combination with enough height for most folks.

It is an extremely versatile tripod/head combination, with many ways to support a camera. You can put a camera over a short wall, directly above a table pointing down, inches above the ground, etc.

The 488RC2 ball head has a feature that should not be ignored. That is the separate release for "panning". You can loosen the lever and rotate the camera horizontally without releasing the ball. This is great for scenic panoramic shots.

Here’s the combination at B&H: 3021BPro/488RC2 (external link)


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smasraum
Senior Member
594 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2005
Location: TX Between Houston and Austin
     
Dec 29, 2006 06:20 |  #12

DriftinS14 wrote in post #2458352 (external link)
Im not really sure why somebody would spend so much on a tripod. I just picked up a Sunpak 5800 for $28. It extends 59" and is adjustable in every way. It can be locked in all directions, comes with a nice head and two quick release bases, and even has levels.

You get what you pay for. As you get/use better equipment/tools you begin to realize that more and more. There's a huge difference when working on a car between using cheap tools and using really good tools or using tools "that will do" or using the right tool for the job. This same thing translates into any arena including photography.


Steve
Canon EOS 60D, 350D, 630
Canon 15-85 IS, 100-400L IS, 50mm 1.8, Canon 18-55mm, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro
Canon AE-1 Program w/ Canon 50mm 1.4 and 70-210

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Dec 29, 2006 06:34 |  #13

SkipD wrote in post #2458774 (external link)
Here’s the combination at B&H: 3021BPro/488RC2 (external link)

Re my post above that is the less expensive of the two that I use, the really sturdy one is a Benbo 2 which you can see in this link, it will give you an idea of it's size

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=38831

Here is the B&H Link http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …&O=productlist&​sku=247269 (external link)


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nodoubt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
452 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Dec 29, 2006 16:32 |  #14

tx guys....anybody else??


40d....
50mm 1.8...tamron 28-75... ef 70-300 IS ....EF 10-22
manfrotto 3021BPRO
linhof PROFI III ball head
wimberly quick release, with a kirk plate

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nodoubt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
452 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Dec 29, 2006 17:41 |  #15

man i sure love how they keep moving my posts .....good grief....


40d....
50mm 1.8...tamron 28-75... ef 70-300 IS ....EF 10-22
manfrotto 3021BPRO
linhof PROFI III ball head
wimberly quick release, with a kirk plate

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,472 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
tripod for 350 with batt grip and heavy lense.....
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1939 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.