Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 30 Dec 2006 (Saturday) 18:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sharp with good color?

 
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,255 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:03 |  #16

oh, and in response to the question in the post... I think it looks acceptably sharp to me!


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:04 as a reply to  @ post 2466088 |  #17

To the cheaters, I assumed the good, honest folks here at POTN would not check EXIF since this was for a highly, sought after prize: 100-count lens tissues :evil:

Regardless, you're all still wrong :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stupot
Goldmember
2,227 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:05 |  #18

hehe!

ok.. umm..

400 DO?


Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
Free filters for your flashgun!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:07 |  #19

Again, to win the brand new, 100-count, OLYMPUS lens cleaning tissues valued at over $2.50 USD, you must:

1) Comment on the image quality
2) State the specific lens used
3) State the Field of View




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:10 |  #20

1) Looks ok.
2) If you really used an Olympus lens, EXIF wouldn't have been transferred.
3) Why?


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dorman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,661 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, NS
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:11 |  #21

I retract my last two guesses. It looks reasonably sharp and the colors are pretty good. Not sure if I dig the bokeh.

Two new guesses:

1)Sigma 80-400 OS @ 400mm
2)Tokina 80-400 @ 400mm



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stupot
Goldmember
2,227 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:11 |  #22

the fact that you want us to comment on IQ probably means you're expecting us to drivel on about how amazing it is, only to be STUNNED by it being some cheapo lens!

so lets have another guess... tokina 80-400 at 400mm

and yes wonderful colours sharpness blabla but ugly bokeh:P


Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
Free filters for your flashgun!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:11 |  #23

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2466124 (external link)
1) Looks ok.
2) If you really used an Olympus lens, EXIF wouldn't have been transferred.
3) Why?

Who said an Oly lens was used? And "why?", because I set the rules for this thread :evil:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:12 |  #24

stupot wrote in post #2466129 (external link)
and yes wonderful colours sharpness blabla but ugly bokeh:P

You don't like the bokeh? :cry:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:14 |  #25

LightRules wrote in post #2466131 (external link)
Who said an Oly lens was used? And "why?", because I set the rules for this thread :evil:

Well you keep emphasizing that they're OLYMPUS cleaning pads. There must be a reason for that. :rolleyes:


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stupot
Goldmember
2,227 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:15 |  #26

LightRules wrote in post #2466135 (external link)
You don't like the bokeh? :cry:

no:(

telephotos should give pretty pleasing results, i guess the backgrounds just a bit too close for this image.


Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
Free filters for your flashgun!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:16 |  #27

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2466140 (external link)
Well you keep emphasizing that they're OLYMPUS cleaning pads. There must be a reason for that. :rolleyes:

Yeah, Olympus, as in name brand. Certainly not Sigma tissues since people might think they could cause their lenses to misfocus after cleaning ;) [tongue in cheek]




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stupot
Goldmember
2,227 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:17 |  #28

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2466140 (external link)
Well you keep emphasizing that they're OLYMPUS cleaning pads. There must be a reason for that. :rolleyes:

yes... yes there must! in fact, i clean my lenses using a jessops cloth! therefore i must use je... oh, no i dont:)


Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
Free filters for your flashgun!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
black_z
Goldmember
Avatar
1,211 posts
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:18 |  #29

What is Field of View?


Canon 30D
Canon 50/1.8 100/2.8
Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stupot
Goldmember
2,227 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks
     
Dec 30, 2006 19:20 |  #30

ooh ooh! maybe the field of view is 640mm since you're using a crop camera!


Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
Free filters for your flashgun!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,564 views & 0 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it.
Sharp with good color?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1135 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.