Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 01 Jan 2007 (Monday) 12:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8 Bit or 16 Bit ??

 
WGK
Member
162 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans, La
     
Jan 01, 2007 12:16 |  #1

I have a Canon 10d camera and just recently received Photoshop CS2. I always shoot raw and am wondering if I should select 8 bit or 16 bit when processing the pctures. Thanks in advance for your help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rfreschner
ishka bibble
Avatar
2,576 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Andover, CT...................... Go Red Sox!
     
Jan 01, 2007 12:24 |  #2

I guess that depends on what you're going to do with the image after converting it from RAW. If you're going to do more editing in PS, having more data to play with using 16 bit would be helpful. If you're just going to print the images, 8 bit would probably suffice.


Rick
"We both can't be wrong; I must be right"
Bob Welch
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WGK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
162 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans, La
     
Jan 01, 2007 17:49 |  #3

Thanks,appreciate the reply, Happy New Year!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tdragone
Goldmember
Avatar
2,190 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, California
     
Jan 01, 2007 19:05 |  #4

My thoughts:

If I even think I'm going to print something or want it hi rez; I process the shot as 16 bit tiff.
If it's just a snapshot and I'm only going to post on the web; I process as 8 bit jpg.

Hope it helps.


-Tom Dragonetti
Spyder Holster + R5 with EF->RF adapter, 1Dmk IV, 50D, G11
10-22, 16-35 2.8Lii, , 24-70 2.8Lii, 50mm 1.4,
70-200 2.8Lii IS, 100-400L IS
1.4x TC, 580EX ii, ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jason77
Senior Member
Avatar
372 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
     
Jan 01, 2007 19:16 as a reply to  @ Tdragone's post |  #5

i keep it at 16 unless i'm specifically going to use it on the web. then i bump it down to 8 at the end.


350 xt with opteka grip | 18-55mm kit lens | 85mm 1.8 | 35mm 2.0
mac mini | apple 23" HD cinema display
coming eventually: 24-70mm L[COLOR="RoyalBlue"][CO​LOR="black"][COLOR="Bl​ack"] | 70-200mm L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jan 02, 2007 03:41 |  #6

I also go with 16. It's particularly important if you want to open the shadows, since it will lessen the chances of causing banding. It is essential if you are editing in a space wider than AdobeRGB.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Jan 02, 2007 04:17 |  #7

Keep it on 16 as long as you can during post processing. Even though the actual bit-depth is 12 bits, you've still go far more tonality/colour values per pixel than you would do with 8-bit. Processing with the larger bit depth will help prevent any possible posterization and banding in fine graduations as you process.

Granted, your output will probably be 8-bit, but you want to minimise any potential corruption during your workflow.

Another good reason to shoot in RAW in my opinion.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WGK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
162 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans, La
     
Jan 02, 2007 21:04 |  #8

Thanks to all, the information is most helpful.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jan 03, 2007 11:05 |  #9

It can't hurt, but since you're doing as much as possible before converting from RAW, you're probably getting the most out of the image that you can get.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Balliolman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,150 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cornwall/Kernow
     
Jan 03, 2007 11:13 |  #10

Okay, can you explain this. When I open a 16 bit TIFF into Photoshop 7 why cant I access layers with it ....


Balliolman
Stereoshooter
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/balliolman/ (external link)

Want to know more? Q. & A. with Balliolman: 3D/Stereo Photography https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=150661

DReb; Canon 50 f1.8; Canon 28-135 IS; Loreo LIAC(T); Flashtrax; Canon 17-40 L; Manfrotto 055 PRO B tripod; Canon 28mm 2.8; Whibal
Need: Primes; Would like: Canon 5D;

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mcary
Senior Member
Avatar
978 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Virginia USA
     
Jan 03, 2007 11:38 |  #11

Balliolman wrote in post #2483079 (external link)
Okay, can you explain this. When I open a 16 bit TIFF into Photoshop 7 why cant I access layers with it ....

I haven't used PS-7 in a number of years but as I recall it's very limited as far as what you can do with 16bit files.

For working with 16bit files you really need CS-2 at this point it probable best just to wait for the release of CS-3

Mike


OMG I saw a nipple, my eye's are bleeding!
Visit http://www.mcaryphoto.​net (external link) (Nudity) warning most images found on this website were shot with cheap plastic lens (50mm 1.4 85 1.8 and 35 2.0)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,016 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
8 Bit or 16 Bit ??
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1354 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.