Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 01 Jan 2007 (Monday) 21:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

learning question 420ex flash vs studio

 
SgWRX
Senior Member
395 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Wi
     
Jan 01, 2007 21:09 |  #1

a while ago i posted how excited i was to be able to use two 420ex flashes off camera with a ste2 transmitter shooting with two 60" umbrellas. at that time i shot 1 model.

i just finished my second studio shot, a family of six (unpaid, friends of mine). i was able to take about 2 hours and shot about 150 pictures. same thing, two 420ex flashes and 60" umbrellas.

it was quite a learning experience again, and i did have some success. on some of my shots, especially those using the ratio function to 4:1 or so, the bright side of the faces came out a little hot. well, not the whole face but the specular highlights on the faces.

the umbrellas were close to equal distance apart and that was about 6-7ft from the closest subjects. my question is, i know that the 420ex can't possibly "fill" the umbrella even though the umbrella was as far from the flash as possible, so is that would could cause the hotspots? say vs. a strobe which would fill the whole 60 inches and make the light even softer?

another thought i had was that the family didn't have any make up on, so some of their faces were a little shinny to begin with.

tia

ps i think i'm hooked and wanna get AB800's now that i've done a couple of "studio" shots :) oh no, here i go sliding down the studio slide! :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jan 02, 2007 09:53 |  #2

It's hard to say without seeing a sample image, but my guess is that filling the umbrella more completely would have little effect on the highlights as you describe. The main advantage of using the whole umbrella would be softer shadows.

Shooting the 420EX into an umbrella, there may be some advantage to using a Sto-Fen Omni-Bounce to spread the light out (though I probably wouldn't buy one just for that purpose). Also, there are some diffusion gels that come with the Roscolux swatchbook  (external link)that might do the job.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SgWRX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
395 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Wi
     
Jan 02, 2007 19:08 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #3

i've thought about it a little more and i think it's just a question of overexposure. i think i was trying to correlate the size of the light source with the spreading out of the light across the surface.

here's a sample 100% crop crappy jpg compression. you can see the hotspots on the cheek and nose. so like diffusing the light in a larger circular area wouldn't get rid of the hotspot on the nose for example.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,143 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
learning question 420ex flash vs studio
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
660 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.