I imagine this is a dumb question. It's the first time I've ever tried to objectively test out a lens though, so I'm not positive what I'm seeing here, and was hoping someone could tell me.
The following three shots were taken with a 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens, at 135mm, with the box only about 12 inches from the lens... in other words, the lens was focused almost at its macro stop. They were taken at f/5.6, f/8, and f/16, respectively. Focus point was the big "6" in the center:
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html' |
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html' |
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html' |
Yes they're underexposed and glarey... just going for a quick and dirty comparison here. Notice the marked decrease in sharpness from center to edges in the first pic, the improvement in the second pic, and the edge-to-edge sharpness in #3.
I'm guessing this is normal barrell distortion on a lens of this quality, pushed to the edge of its performance envelope like this? If I'm wrong and it's something else, could someone please tell me what? It takes great photos in more normal settings, and only displays this problem at full zoom and wide aperture. I know it's a middle of the road lens and I'm not expecting L performance or anything, just want to make sure I don't have a bad copy that needs replacing...
Thanks...


)
