thanks, i think the website hosting the pics destroyed the quality tho, it took 27 pics that were like 3.5-4 mb each to 1.333 mb for all 27, so that could be why some of them look kinda bad.
Jan 04, 2007 09:32 | #16 thanks, i think the website hosting the pics destroyed the quality tho, it took 27 pics that were like 3.5-4 mb each to 1.333 mb for all 27, so that could be why some of them look kinda bad. www.acephoto.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2114 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
- 