Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
Thread started 06 Jan 2007 (Saturday) 21:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

HDR/BW.. which?

 
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 06, 2007 21:44 |  #1

Just curious if you like the HDR version, or the bw conversion from the HDR? This was done with 1 raw file, 4 exposure levels.. some PS work to get the soft focus look..

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shutter22
I'm very sensitive
Avatar
1,379 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: The Only Town in Pennsylvania, fools.
     
Jan 06, 2007 23:35 |  #2

Hmm, I like them both very much. They both have a totally different feel to them. Very nice work.


Danielle
http://flickr.com/phot​os/danielledeleon/ (external link)https://photography-on-the.net/forum/danielle​.dphoto.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
White_Marten
Senior Member
Avatar
456 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Russia, Moscow
     
Jan 07, 2007 08:19 |  #3

Nice work, but a too soft for my taste...


Canon 350D, BgE3 Tamron 17-50 f-2.8,Yupiter 85 f-2

Canon 430EX, Sigma EF-500, Nikon sb-25, El-Skyports
www.dkunin.ru (external link) / Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cgratti
Lord_Malone, your still a newb...
Avatar
3,315 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: E-A-G-L-E-S - EAGLES
     
Jan 07, 2007 14:39 |  #4

Nice work, but the first one doesn't look like HDR to me. It looks more like a softened and desaturated image. Doing HDR's with only 1 image doesn't make it look like a true HDR to me.

But I like the color and image.



Canon 30D

Canon 10D
Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 II USM
Apple iMac G5



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mannytkd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,224 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Bradford West Yorkshire
     
Jan 07, 2007 15:45 |  #5

Not so keen on HDR and looking at you edits you can clearly see the halos where you've used the brush tool....???


Canon 50D | [COLOR=black]18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Canon EF 100mm USM macro | Canon 50mm MK2 | Tokina 11-16 | Kenko Auto Extension Tubes | Uniloc 1200 series pod | Canon 430EX flash gun | Some filters
www.karls-photography.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 07, 2007 15:59 |  #6

cgratti wrote in post #2503859 (external link)
Nice work, but the first one doesn't look like HDR to me. It looks more like a softened and desaturated image.

Mannytkd wrote in post #2504181 (external link)
Not so keen on HDR and looking at you edits you can clearly see the halos where you've used the brush tool....???



Thanks! That's actually what I was trying to do, was make the HDR not look HDR.. Here's the original HDR :)

I didn't use a brush tool.. maybe the softening, layering and blurring created those halos?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Jan 07, 2007 18:13 |  #7

BrandonSi wrote in post #2500913 (external link)
Just curious if you like the HDR version, or the bw conversion from the HDR? This was done with 1 raw file, 4 exposure levels.. some PS work to get the soft focus look..

the colour one doesnt quite do it for me but the B+W is interesting;)


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toddb
Senior Member
Avatar
792 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Seattle Washington
     
Jan 07, 2007 18:33 |  #8

I'm one of those who like this look. I like both the color and B&W versions. I think you've made an image that would normally be tossed out a keeper. Doesn't really look soft to me. There is allot of detail there. Looks like you duplicated the layer and changed it to softlight (or something like that) and then blurred that layer. It's like it blurs the color but the details are sharp which I like. Like your seeing the image in a more dream like state.

Now you just need to create some more ominous looking clouds in the background to complete the transformation. :-)


10D, EF17-40L, EF50F1.4, EF28-135IS, 550EX [AlienBees 2xB800 and 1xB400 with large softbox and reversible umbrella] Sekonic L-358

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 07, 2007 18:39 |  #9

toddb wrote in post #2504959 (external link)
I'm one of those who like this look. I like both the color and B&W versions. I think you've made an image that would normally be tossed out a keeper. Doesn't really look soft to me. There is allot of detail there. Looks like you duplicated the layer and changed it to softlight (or something like that) and then blurred that layer. It's like it blurs the color but the details are sharp which I like. Like your seeing the image in a more dream like state.

Now you just need to create some more ominous looking clouds in the background to complete the transformation. :-)

Thanks! I agree the sky is the weak link here.. It was a throw-away, I decided to play around with Photomatix with it and it just turned out appealing.. I think I'll start doing that more.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyHobbies
Goldmember
Avatar
2,734 posts
Likes: 137
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA!
     
Jan 07, 2007 18:39 |  #10

HDR version.


~ Jeff

Canon EOS-1DX & 1Ds MkIII, 20D(IR), G12, G9, G5, ... Gear List
JMM Photography ~ Discovering Art in Everyday Lifeexternal link | Model Mayhem #675060external link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oni0n56
Senior Member
Avatar
407 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Jan 07, 2007 19:19 |  #11

I like the color one. It's got nice soft colors and the b/w one is just lacking all that detail and warmth.


Quitting photography for now, but thanks POTN we had a good run ;)
1D MK3 (SOLD), 24-70mm f/2.8 (FS) (external link) / 70-200mm f/2.8 IS Mk1 (FS) (external link), Gitzo GT3530LSV (FS) (external link) + BH55 (SOLD) (external link), 580 EX II, 2x 580EX (SOLD) (external link), B+W (sold) (external link), 7MDH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viatorum777
Member
Avatar
131 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 07, 2007 19:31 |  #12

I like both alot. I personally think the "softness" adds to the edginess and drama of the story which the two pictures are both telling. Interestingly, I think both pictures may tell a slightly different story with the color vs. B&W. In my opinion then it is a both-and decision. Good job.


Canon 30D || 17-40L || 50 1.8 || 85 1.8 || Flickr (external link) || theologiaviatorum (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrsKitty
Goldmember
1,193 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
Jan 07, 2007 23:12 |  #13

The color version reminds me of the soft glow around the buildings in a Thomas Kincaid painting.

I like the B/W the best.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 08, 2007 19:16 |  #14

B&W version rocks.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,277 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
HDR/BW.. which?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2289 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.