Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Jan 2007 (Sunday) 18:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

question on resolution

 
nycgrip
Member
88 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: NYC, NY
     
Jan 07, 2007 18:52 |  #1

theoretically we have an 8 megapixel camera with a 400mm lens and a 16 megapixel camera with a 200mm lens. if they both took the same picture from the same placement then cropped the 16mp/200mm to have same view as 8mp/400, would thier resolution be equal? consider both full frame, just so its not asked.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pcasciola
POTN SHOPKEEPER
Avatar
3,130 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Millstone Township, NJ
     
Jan 07, 2007 18:59 |  #2

I'm sure there would be some minute differences, but generally speaking, yes.

EDIT: Wait I take that back. I may have spoke too soon. Going to do the proper math now. On second thought, I'm pretty sure you would need 4 times the resolution for your statement to be true. 80 percent sure.....75-80.


Philip Casciola
Pro Camera Gear (external link) - POTN Shop (external link)
Canon 7D, EF 50/1.8, EF 85/1.8, EF 300/4L IS, EF-S 18-55, Tamron 28-75/2.8, EF 70-200/2.8L IS
Sigma 1.4x & 2x, Tamron 1.4x, Gitzo 2220 Explorer, 322RC2 grip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bamamike
Senior Member
278 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
     
Jan 07, 2007 19:30 |  #3

Uncropped you have SQR 2 times more resolution, cropped you have the same resolution as with the 8MP picture.


Two bodies left, some "soso" lenses, and still a lot of gear.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Savagebasher
Member
244 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jan 07, 2007 19:39 |  #4

you would need a 32mp camera @ 200mm to get the same crop as an 8mp camera @ 400mm




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pcasciola
POTN SHOPKEEPER
Avatar
3,130 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Millstone Township, NJ
     
Jan 07, 2007 19:46 |  #5

Bamamike wrote in post #2505192 (external link)
Uncropped you have SQR 2 times more resolution, cropped you have the same resolution as with the 8MP picture.

I'm not sure about that. If the 200mm picture is half the height and half the width of the 400mm picture, cropping the 16MP picture would only leave you with 4MP.

I think 4x the resolution is required, because the 200mm shot is double the width and double the height, which is 4x the area of the 400mm shot.


Philip Casciola
Pro Camera Gear (external link) - POTN Shop (external link)
Canon 7D, EF 50/1.8, EF 85/1.8, EF 300/4L IS, EF-S 18-55, Tamron 28-75/2.8, EF 70-200/2.8L IS
Sigma 1.4x & 2x, Tamron 1.4x, Gitzo 2220 Explorer, 322RC2 grip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScottE
Goldmember
3,179 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Kelowna, Canada
     
Jan 07, 2007 22:15 |  #6

To crop a picture taken with a 200 mm lens to be the same as one taken with a 400 mm lens you would only use 1/2 of the height and 1/2 of the width of the total frame. That means you are only using 1/4 of the total area of the frame. If you started our with 16 mp and only used 1/4 of the frame you would end up with a 4 mp image. You would expect the resolution of the 400 mm on the 8 mp camera to be better because it has 8 mp compared to the 4 mp of the cropped image.

Incidentally, going from 8 mp to 16 mp does not double the resolution. Resolution is measured in line pairs per mm in the vertical, horizontal or diagonal direction. To double resolution you have to double it in both horizontal and vertical directions, so you need 4 times as many pixels. It would take a 32 mp camera to have double the resolution of an 8 mp camera. That is why as more and more pixels get packed onto sensors we see less and less improvement in resolution with each increase.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,085 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
question on resolution
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1692 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.