I had the Sigma 24-70 and it was fine as far as focul lenth.. So I guess I will get the L
| POLL: "24-70 f2.8 L or 17-55 f2.8 IS" |
 24-70 f2.8 L | 39 61.9% |
| 17-55 f2.8 IS | 22 34.9% |
| Other... explain which one and why. | 2 3.2% |
cbr929rrerion THREAD STARTER Senior Member  825 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Bristol, Tennessee More info | Jan 11, 2007 17:31 | #16 I had the Sigma 24-70 and it was fine as far as focul lenth.. So I guess I will get the L Canon 1D MKIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsaraleksi Goldmember  1,653 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA More info | Jan 11, 2007 17:42 | #17 h0rde wrote in post #2521696  if you've got an APS-C body, get the 17-55. It's wider, just as fast, produces images just as good, and has IS. Only full-framers *** should buy the 24-70 over the 17-55. Or, you know, people who need that focal length? --Alex Editorial Portfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1726 guests, 149 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
