Hi,
Heard some of you mentioned about NoiseNinja, is there any way to download it?
Is the software used to reduce noise in the pictures?
Chee Kiang
Canon IXUS 850
cheekiang Member 78 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Singapore More info | Jan 13, 2007 09:31 | #1 Hi, Canon EOS400D - lens:18mm - 55mm f3.5-5.6 and 55mm-200mm f4.5-5.6. Accessories: Canon Battery grip-BG-E3, Canon Remote Switch-RS-60E3, Sigma Electronic flash EF-500 DG Super E0-ETTLII, Canon tripod SL-1200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustShootin' Senior Member 820 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: South Florida More info | Jan 13, 2007 10:02 | #2 I don't have this program, but am thinking about getting it. It can be downloaded from >>> http://www.picturecode.com/ Gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mazu Member 140 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Finland More info | Jan 13, 2007 10:04 | #3 Yes and yes Canon 30D, Tokina 100mm macro, Sigma 17-70, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, 70-200 f/4L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
uttershutternut Senior Member 300 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: deep in the heart of Texas More info | Neat Image is also very good. I have the demo version. I'm researching to find the best software for noise removal. Someone in this forum recommended Neat Image over Noise Ninja. I personally do not know whether that is true, but I trusted their advice and downloaded Neat Image. Mircales happen every second of our lives. You just have to be aware enough to see them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spur Senior Member 391 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas More info | Jan 13, 2007 13:34 | #5 uttershutternut wrote in post #2534200 Neat Image is also very good. I have the demo version. I'm researching to find the best software for noise removal. Someone in this forum recommended Neat Image over Noise Ninja. I personally do not know whether that is true, but I trusted their advice and downloaded Neat Image. While your comparing, you might also want to look at Noiseware.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mishnogram Senior Member 264 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Ontario Canada More info | Jan 13, 2007 22:49 | #6 I would give another nod to noiseware. Although I currently use noise ninja, I find that noiseware is much easier to use. Min
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sjprg Senior Member 297 posts Joined Jul 2003 More info | Jan 14, 2007 00:21 | #7 All three work well, different subjects, shot differently show a bias towards different ones. I use all three, trying each on a difficult subject. They are cheap enough to own all three. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1569 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||