Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 13 Jan 2007 (Saturday) 11:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bags, bags, and bags But which one?

 
Jay12329
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Thatcham (UK)
     
Jan 13, 2007 11:38 |  #1

Aaaaaaagh!
There are so many bags out there and looking on the internet doesnt help me decide if my kit will fit, or if it will be too big for what i've got. And there are no decent photography shops near to have a look :(
So guys I know these questions are anoying and there are about 10 a day. But...
Which bags should i consider to carry:
20d + Grip
70-200 f2.8
100-300 f4
20-40 f2.8
As well as my batteries, filters, cf cards, memory tank, flash, extenders, monopod...

I would also like my bag to take my laptop (15.4inch widescreen mac)
AND
Have some space for a bottle of water, a pack of crisps and a choc bar.

I know i'm asking a lot.
Thanks for any help and advice.
J


5D, 20d + Grip, Sigma 300 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 20-40 f2.8,Canon 24-105 F4 L, Manfrotto Mono Pod, 580ex. And No Clue.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jay12329
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Thatcham (UK)
     
Jan 13, 2007 11:39 |  #2

Forgot to say I prefer backpacks as they spread the weight.
J


5D, 20d + Grip, Sigma 300 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 20-40 f2.8,Canon 24-105 F4 L, Manfrotto Mono Pod, 580ex. And No Clue.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NewTekBuzz
Member
85 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Jan 13, 2007 11:53 as a reply to  @ Jay12329's post |  #3

this might be a little small for what you want but take a look if you havnt already

http://www.dcresource.​com/forums/showthread.​php?t=27848 (external link)

Tim


Canon 7D ~ Canon 20D
70-200L f/2.8 | 100 f/2.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 10-22 f/3.5-4.5
580EX | BG-E7 | BG-E2

"Keyboard failure, press any key to continue.... :confused: "

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
awad
Goldmember
Avatar
1,067 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
     
Jan 13, 2007 12:06 |  #4

since i push the kata bags in every other thread, why stop now?

check out the kata r-103.

heres an old set up.

IMAGE: http://johnawad.net/bag3.jpg

heres how it looks like now.

IMAGE: http://johnawad.net/disorganized.jpg

http://www.redfieldpho​to.com (external link)
http://www.theredfield​blog.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jay12329
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Thatcham (UK)
     
Jan 14, 2007 04:23 as a reply to  @ awad's post |  #5

Hmmm thanks for those guys, both look a little small. Although the KATA states it can hold a 300mm attached, is that a 200 f2.8 on the camera in that shot? Would you be able to fit that lens down the side if you had a 300 f4 in the middle (300 f4 is about an inch longer but similar width.)


Anyone else care to share their set up for similar kit?
Thanks
J


5D, 20d + Grip, Sigma 300 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 20-40 f2.8,Canon 24-105 F4 L, Manfrotto Mono Pod, 580ex. And No Clue.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Jan 14, 2007 04:49 |  #6

Computrekker AW from Lowepro, which I had and liked tho' a bit boring ;-)a or the Crumpler December Quarter which I have now and is my day to day bag when I need to carry my laptop. Has a lot of storage for papers and bits and pieces. You will need to check depth if you want to store the 100-300mm with it on the body as it's quite a long combo. The Lowepro will fit as I had that combo with it. Crumpler review here


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jay12329
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Thatcham (UK)
     
Jan 14, 2007 10:02 as a reply to  @ condyk's post |  #7

I'm not to bothered about storeing a lens on the body. I havnt before it just seams the done thing.
J


5D, 20d + Grip, Sigma 300 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 20-40 f2.8,Canon 24-105 F4 L, Manfrotto Mono Pod, 580ex. And No Clue.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jan 14, 2007 10:11 |  #8

The Lowepro Stealth Reporter 650 AW will do the job for you and will be a HECK OF A LOT easier to work out of and MANY TIMES safer for your equipment. I read way too many stories of zippers failing or the user failing to close a zipper on a backpack and expensive equipment hitting the ground.

The 650AW holds my big lenses with their hoods mounted (reversed on the longer lenses) and my 20D/grip mounted to any one of them. All the lenses are stored in vertical drop-in tubes and cannot drop out and fall on the ground unless I deliberately invert the bag.

The shoulder strap has one of the best shoulder pads I have ever used. It is quite comfortable to carry, even fully loaded, and I work out of the bag without having to take it off my shoulder.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Jan 14, 2007 10:16 |  #9

Looks good, but does it take a laptop?


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jay12329
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Thatcham (UK)
     
Jan 14, 2007 10:24 as a reply to  @ condyk's post |  #10

Unfortunaly I cant use the one shoulder type bags. I've genrally stuck to backpack designs as I suffer from back and neck pain following a bike accident last year.
I'm investigating the Lowpro and Kata bags. I've also seen some nice looking crumplers, but again I cant tell if they are too big or small.
Thanks
J


5D, 20d + Grip, Sigma 300 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 20-40 f2.8,Canon 24-105 F4 L, Manfrotto Mono Pod, 580ex. And No Clue.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dshootist
Senior Member
Avatar
450 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: if you tell me, we'll both know...
     
Jan 14, 2007 10:34 as a reply to  @ SkipD's post |  #11

I picked up the National Geographic Earth Explorer Large Backpack for a trip to Tanzania (link: http://www.adorama.com​/NGBPL.html (external link) for item and my review). With only a few nit-picky gripes, this was the perfect choice to carry all of my gear (listed in the review). It now replaces my LowePro Stealth Reporter 650AW shoulder bag as an everyday carry bag. With only one body, I would have suggested the Medium Earth Explorer, but I tried to fit my 15" Powerbook in the compartment and it was a fraction too big for the pocket (even though it says a 15" screen will fit). I also picked it because it doesn't scream "Here's all my photo gear in one easy-to-swipe package!" It looks more like a travel backpack.
Tenba's new Shootout Series also seems like a good bag albeit somewhat bulkier than the NG Earth Explorer series. Tamrac's Adventure Series 9 seems like the best fit for your current needs, but may not be able to handle any gear expansion later on. LowePro's CompuDaypack and CompuRover also sound like good options as well, but again may fall short later in the storage department. I'm sure there are other bags that closely match what your looking for, but these are the ones that caught my interest. Happy hunting!


Why yes, I DO shoot people—and they pay me well for it.:D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Analogsound
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jan 14, 2007 11:17 as a reply to  @ dshootist's post |  #12

I sniped from E Pay the Tamrac Super Pro 13 Model 613 recently and am excited about all the room I will have to grow with it. Most bags I saw just didn't have the room or compartments and I don't want some kinda back pack thing. I just don't see myself needing to lug around my bag much let alone hiking with it LOL :)


Canon EOS 7D EOS Rebel Xti
Canon EF 100-400mm L IS
Sigma 15-30mm EX ultra wide Canon 50mm Tamron 17-50mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,947 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2872
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jan 14, 2007 11:21 |  #13

For one of the higher end products check out this site:

http://www.thinktankph​oto.com/ttp_products.h​tml (external link)

They make a lot of bag gear, and the Airport Addicted may suit your needs: Features:
Airplane carry on size.
Holds 400 2.8 and 300 2.8 lenses.
Removable 15” laptop case
Seam-sealed raincover.
Tuck away shoulder straps
Dual main compartment access
Monopod holder
Tripod holder

I don't own it but have just ordered the Airport Security rolling bag which may be slightly larger.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jan 14, 2007 11:55 |  #14

condyk wrote in post #2539097 (external link)
Looks good, but does it take a laptop?

The Lowepro Stealth Reporter 650 AW definitely has a pocket for a laptop.

It's to bad the OP cannot use a shoulder bag, as this one is really superb.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dshootist
Senior Member
Avatar
450 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: if you tell me, we'll both know...
     
Jan 14, 2007 12:23 as a reply to  @ SkipD's post |  #15

It's to bad the OP cannot use a shoulder bag, as this one is really superb.

I totally agree. I'll still keep mine around to use as a location bag. When it was my main storage carrier, it held about 95% of all my gear (close to 45 lbs) and it never showed signs of wear or damage over three years of daily use. I did start to have shoulder/back issues, but shoulder bags inherently put all the weight on one side of your body by design whereas backpacks distribute more evenly.


Why yes, I DO shoot people—and they pay me well for it.:D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,509 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Bags, bags, and bags But which one?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1801 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.