Let me say ... I am a long way from PRO ...
... but these (to me) are the best so far!
( comments welcome! )
Digital_Duck Senior Member 468 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Holly Springs, NC More info | Jan 14, 2007 10:51 | #1 |
PictureNorthCarolina Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops! 9,318 posts Likes: 248 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Jan 14, 2007 14:51 | #2 They both utilize dof to isolate the subjects. Compositionally, tho, #1 is too close to the bottom border. Also, it seems to be a little soft or perhaps the POF was a little off. #2 is the better of the two. However, it's curious that at least to my eye, the bokeh seems to be different in 1 than in 2. A lens change perhaps? /Dan Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Jan 14, 2007 19:09 | #3 Permanent banI would like the background of #1 with the focus of #2. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PictureNorthCarolina Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops! 9,318 posts Likes: 248 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Jan 15, 2007 00:31 | #4 I forgot something also - small point, but the signature is overly obtrusive, especially in #1 where it has become a distraction. You might want to consider toning it down. /Dan Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2007 07:04 | #5 About these two shots:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1167 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||