Is this interesting at all? Somehow it seemed like a good idea at the time, but it doesn't seem right somehow. Any suggestions for post processing or re-shooting it would be welcome.
Thanks for looking.
mhardy Member 64 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah More info | Jan 14, 2007 16:45 | #2 I like it, I think it would have a little more effect if you bumped contrast a bit on it though. http://www.htengineers.com/photosite
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrsKitty Goldmember 1,193 posts Joined Nov 2005 More info | Jan 14, 2007 17:46 | #3 Maybe the haze on the left is detracting?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 14, 2007 18:45 | #4 It was a very rainy, foggy day. I was kind of trying to capture that. I purposefully left the contrast low on the left-hand, hazy side to try to keep that foggy look. Bumping up the contrast over there makes the whole image nice and sharp, but that's not quite what I was going for. But I agree, it didn't work too well...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Marsha050 Member 170 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Central California More info | Jan 14, 2007 21:08 | #5 I like the picture, but it I dont know why... it does need some contrast, but feel it would take away from the sense of the day. Maybe its one of those pictures that takes a certain matting and frame to bring it out... I still really like it! Canon EOS 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcw122 Goldmember 1,940 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: West Chester, PA More info | Jan 14, 2007 23:16 | #6 It generally looks good, but I think it lacks a solid subject. I enjoy the colors and the feel though...that part is great! "Ill show you."-John Hammond
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jason77 Senior Member 372 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Philadelphia, PA More info | i don't think it needs a contrast boost at all. it would kill the mood. i think it may just need to be cropped differently. 350 xt with opteka grip | 18-55mm kit lens | 85mm 1.8 | 35mm 2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2007 07:05 | #8 Jason77 wrote in post #2543386 i don't think it needs a contrast boost at all. it would kill the mood. i think it may just need to be cropped differently. Hmmmm.... yeah, maybe. Do you think there is too mugh negative space? Too much foreground? I'll have to think about that. I'm not immediately seeing an alternate crop. Maybe just take a little off the top and bottom?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2007 07:09 | #9 jcw122 wrote in post #2542850 It generally looks good, but I think it lacks a solid subject. I enjoy the colors and the feel though...that part is great! Should the tree be darker to make it stand out as the subject? Too many other little trees around? How about if the wall below the tree was darker, would that help keep your eye on the tree?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Marsha050 Member 170 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Central California More info | Jan 15, 2007 07:50 | #10 Very good points made here... try making the tree a focal point. Can we see the orginal picture? Canon EOS 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tungsram Member 120 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Michigan More info | A little different take... (different crop, levels adjustment, some burning... etc) Whatever. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2007 10:46 | #12 Yeah, i can see how the darker look has its merits. I thought about that style as I was converting the RAW file. But I noticed that I totally lose the fog. For this shot I wanted the more distant trees to sort of fade out into the fog more, which means low contast and fading to a neutral gray. But the silhouette look is nice, too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2007 10:47 | #13 Marsha050 wrote in post #2544141 Very good points made here... try making the tree a focal point. Can we see the orginal picture? Okay, good idea. How do you suggest that I make the tree the focal point?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tungsram Member 120 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Michigan More info | Jan 15, 2007 10:58 | #14 MCB wrote in post #2544814 Yeah, i can see how the darker look has its merits. I thought about that style as I was converting the RAW file. But I noticed that I totally lose the fog. For this shot I wanted the more distant trees to sort of fade out into the fog more, which means low contast and fading to a neutral gray. But the silhouette look is nice, too. The version I posted is a combination of two different conversions of the RAW file. One has linear contrast and other settings to keep the fog prominent while the other had strong contrast and other settings to bring out the reflections in the sand and make the tree stand out. Then I did some selective curves, levels, a channel mixer adjustment layer, a dode/burn overlay, etc. I'll post the foggy raw conversion when I get home this evening. The only problem I see with the fog is that it's not even across the plane of the photo, therefore it's a little distracting, and almost looks like an error in exposure. I totally understand what you were going for, but it really just didn't work well with this photo IMHO. Keep trying- you'll get it Whatever. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 15, 2007 11:29 | #15 Tungsram wrote in post #2544863 The only problem I see with the fog is that it's not even across the plane of the photo, therefore it's a little distracting, and almost looks like an error in exposure. I totally understand what you were going for, but it really just didn't work well with this photo IMHO. Keep trying- you'll get it ![]() If the fog was uniform across the image, then the tree would lose contrast, right? Would that be annoying? Most people complain if the contrast isn't cranked way up...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2154 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||