Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
Thread started 14 Jan 2007 (Sunday) 16:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Monotone Tree

 
MCB
Senior Member
Avatar
668 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass.
     
Jan 14, 2007 16:39 |  #1

Is this interesting at all? Somehow it seemed like a good idea at the time, but it doesn't seem right somehow. Any suggestions for post processing or re-shooting it would be welcome.
Thanks for looking.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mhardy
Member
64 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
     
Jan 14, 2007 16:45 |  #2

I like it, I think it would have a little more effect if you bumped contrast a bit on it though.


http://www.htengineers​.com/photosite (external link) <temporary parking for a bit until development is finished.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrsKitty
Goldmember
1,193 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
Jan 14, 2007 17:46 |  #3

Maybe the haze on the left is detracting?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCB
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
668 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass.
     
Jan 14, 2007 18:45 |  #4

It was a very rainy, foggy day. I was kind of trying to capture that. I purposefully left the contrast low on the left-hand, hazy side to try to keep that foggy look. Bumping up the contrast over there makes the whole image nice and sharp, but that's not quite what I was going for. But I agree, it didn't work too well...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Marsha050
Member
Avatar
170 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Central California
     
Jan 14, 2007 21:08 |  #5

I like the picture, but it I dont know why... it does need some contrast, but feel it would take away from the sense of the day. Maybe its one of those pictures that takes a certain matting and frame to bring it out... I still really like it!


Canon EOS 20D
Canon 28-200 mm lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcw122
Goldmember
Avatar
1,940 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
     
Jan 14, 2007 23:16 |  #6

It generally looks good, but I think it lacks a solid subject. I enjoy the colors and the feel though...that part is great!


"Ill show you."-John Hammond
Gear List
:D "YES! I AM INVINSIBLE!"-Boris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jason77
Senior Member
Avatar
372 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
     
Jan 15, 2007 02:04 as a reply to  @ jcw122's post |  #7

i don't think it needs a contrast boost at all. it would kill the mood. i think it may just need to be cropped differently.


350 xt with opteka grip | 18-55mm kit lens | 85mm 1.8 | 35mm 2.0
mac mini | apple 23" HD cinema display
coming eventually: 24-70mm L[COLOR="RoyalBlue"][CO​LOR="black"][COLOR="Bl​ack"] | 70-200mm L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCB
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
668 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass.
     
Jan 15, 2007 07:05 |  #8

Jason77 wrote in post #2543386 (external link)
i don't think it needs a contrast boost at all. it would kill the mood. i think it may just need to be cropped differently.

Hmmmm.... yeah, maybe. Do you think there is too mugh negative space? Too much foreground? I'll have to think about that. I'm not immediately seeing an alternate crop. Maybe just take a little off the top and bottom?

Thanks for the constructive input everyone. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCB
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
668 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass.
     
Jan 15, 2007 07:09 |  #9

jcw122 wrote in post #2542850 (external link)
It generally looks good, but I think it lacks a solid subject. I enjoy the colors and the feel though...that part is great!

Should the tree be darker to make it stand out as the subject? Too many other little trees around? How about if the wall below the tree was darker, would that help keep your eye on the tree?

I would like to try this shot after dark, when those lamps are on. I'm not sure how well that would work, but it seems like it might be interesting. It's supposed to snow tonight, so maybe that would look good. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Marsha050
Member
Avatar
170 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Central California
     
Jan 15, 2007 07:50 |  #10

Very good points made here... try making the tree a focal point. Can we see the orginal picture?


Canon EOS 20D
Canon 28-200 mm lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tungsram
Member
Avatar
120 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Jan 15, 2007 09:43 as a reply to  @ Marsha050's post |  #11

A little different take... (different crop, levels adjustment, some burning... etc)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Whatever. My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCB
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
668 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass.
     
Jan 15, 2007 10:46 |  #12

Yeah, i can see how the darker look has its merits. I thought about that style as I was converting the RAW file. But I noticed that I totally lose the fog. For this shot I wanted the more distant trees to sort of fade out into the fog more, which means low contast and fading to a neutral gray. But the silhouette look is nice, too.

The version I posted is a combination of two different conversions of the RAW file. One has linear contrast and other settings to keep the fog prominent while the other had strong contrast and other settings to bring out the reflections in the sand and make the tree stand out. Then I did some selective curves, levels, a channel mixer adjustment layer, a dode/burn overlay, etc.

I'll post the foggy raw conversion when I get home this evening.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCB
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
668 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass.
     
Jan 15, 2007 10:47 |  #13

Marsha050 wrote in post #2544141 (external link)
Very good points made here... try making the tree a focal point. Can we see the orginal picture?

Okay, good idea. How do you suggest that I make the tree the focal point?

[edit: the image isn't cropped, if that's what you were getting at. If you have a good idea for cropping it to make the focus more on the tree, feel free to post your version!]




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tungsram
Member
Avatar
120 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Jan 15, 2007 10:58 |  #14

MCB wrote in post #2544814 (external link)
Yeah, i can see how the darker look has its merits. I thought about that style as I was converting the RAW file. But I noticed that I totally lose the fog. For this shot I wanted the more distant trees to sort of fade out into the fog more, which means low contast and fading to a neutral gray. But the silhouette look is nice, too.

The version I posted is a combination of two different conversions of the RAW file. One has linear contrast and other settings to keep the fog prominent while the other had strong contrast and other settings to bring out the reflections in the sand and make the tree stand out. Then I did some selective curves, levels, a channel mixer adjustment layer, a dode/burn overlay, etc.

I'll post the foggy raw conversion when I get home this evening.

The only problem I see with the fog is that it's not even across the plane of the photo, therefore it's a little distracting, and almost looks like an error in exposure. I totally understand what you were going for, but it really just didn't work well with this photo IMHO. Keep trying- you'll get it :)


Whatever. My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCB
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
668 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass.
     
Jan 15, 2007 11:29 |  #15

Tungsram wrote in post #2544863 (external link)
The only problem I see with the fog is that it's not even across the plane of the photo, therefore it's a little distracting, and almost looks like an error in exposure. I totally understand what you were going for, but it really just didn't work well with this photo IMHO. Keep trying- you'll get it :)

If the fog was uniform across the image, then the tree would lose contrast, right? Would that be annoying? Most people complain if the contrast isn't cranked way up...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,497 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Monotone Tree
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2153 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.