Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Jan 2007 (Sunday) 20:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Possible Problem with 1Ds Mk II. Opinions?

 
TobyG
Mostly Lurking
15 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 14, 2007 22:21 as a reply to  @ post 2542600 |  #16

It's the shutter starting to go. Seen many pictures of people posting images with that white line on top. Take more images at faster shutter speeds, see if the white line is more pronounced. Although it may just be starting to go and not always show up.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Jan 14, 2007 22:28 |  #17

TobyG wrote in post #2542620 (external link)
It's the shutter starting to go. Seen many pictures of people posting images with that white line on top. Take more images at faster shutter speeds, see if the white line is more pronounced. Although it may just be starting to go and not always show up.

Good thought. That's the most plausible theory I've heard so far, but if so, that's a concern. This camera has fewer than 2200 shots on it. I'll try it again with different shutter speeds to see if that makes a difference. Thanks.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arthurgoh
Senior Member
Avatar
349 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
     
Jan 14, 2007 22:59 as a reply to  @ Belmondo's post |  #18

But if it was the shutter shouldn't it be consistent with the other lenses as well?


5DmkII, 17-40f4, 24-70f2.8, 24-105f4IS, 70-200f2.8IS, 50f1.4, 85f1.2mkII, 100f2.8macro, 135f2
Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michael
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,981 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
     
Jan 14, 2007 23:02 |  #19

arthurgoh wrote in post #2542762 (external link)
But if it was the shutter shouldn't it be consistent with the other lenses as well?

Thats what I thought too. If its only happening with the one lens, doesnt it have to be that lens causing it? I would have thought so.


Michael

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Jan 14, 2007 23:03 |  #20

arthurgoh wrote in post #2542762 (external link)
But if it was the shutter shouldn't it be consistent with the other lenses as well?

Logic would suggest that. Whatever it is, it's either a problem with the sensor or near the sensor. If it isn't the sensor itself, then the shutter is the next most likely suspect. If it was near the bottom of the image instead of the top, we could even consider the mirror, but that's not the case.

I have a few different scenarios I'm going to try tomorrow (or as soon as possible). I also want to see if it shows up on my 100-400 on the long end.

There are sure a lot of possibilities, although none of them make a lot of sense, especially because the camera is so new.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jan 14, 2007 23:57 as a reply to  @ Belmondo's post |  #21

Do more tests and then let's see.
When did that happen exactly? did you drop the lens or something wrong happened to the lens?
more tests will show if there is really a problem or not, sometimes problems occurs in lens or camera for a while then disappeared, so don't panic and sure we all here will try to find the solution, it can happen to anyone here so we should be careful and aware about it for next time appearing.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Jan 15, 2007 00:00 |  #22

look like a shutter issue to me. Sorry to see you got a problem. Hope I am wrong.


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Jan 15, 2007 00:07 |  #23

Tareq wrote in post #2543040 (external link)
Do more tests and then let's see.
When did that happen exactly? did you drop the lens or something wrong happened to the lens?
more tests will show if there is really a problem or not, sometimes problems occurs in lens or camera for a while then disappeared, so don't panic and sure we all here will try to find the solution, it can happen to anyone here so we should be careful and aware about it for next time appearing.

I'm going to see if I can duplicate the problem again with any other lenses. I don't think there was any specific trauma to the camera or the lens. I'm usually pretty careful with my equipment.

Dante King wrote in post #2543051 (external link)
look like a shutter issue to me. Sorry to see you got a problem. Hope I am wrong.

Thanks, Dante. I'm not horribly upset about it---more curious than anything. If there's a problem, I'll just get it fixed. At this point, it's more of an intellectual exercise trying to figure out what happened.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Jan 15, 2007 00:15 as a reply to  @ Belmondo's post |  #24

Yes Belmondo, it is a good idea to figure out the problem, who knows, it could become bigger, so fixing it now better than waiting to grow th problem, and i like to keep all my gears as good free of problems as i can.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jan 15, 2007 08:31 |  #25

First thought would be shutter bounce, but that should show up on the other lenses as well. Next would be internal reflections somewhere. Close enough to anyone else with either a FF or a 400 f/5.6 to run a comparison? Maybe even try borrowing a film body if it comes down to it.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dave_G
Goldmember
Avatar
3,621 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Jan 15, 2007 08:43 |  #26

light leaking in somehow? any damage to the lens?

when my shutter went it was more of a curved highlight from top to bottom of the image but that was on a 300D.

strange one that.


Skoda Fabia vRS SE| Don't make a 70-200 thread | Pan Masterâ„¢ © Allen Mead | Skodalover |Hippopotomonstrosesqui​ppedaliophobia- Fear of long words... | now with 17s, a turbo, rear tints, dual climate, cruise... must be a new company car

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Jan 15, 2007 08:55 |  #27

Shutter/mirror issue.

This same effect but a dirty sensor was posted a week or so ago. Where it showed with only one lens to the neaked eye. This guy had a smudge on his sensor that only showed with the 100-400 I believe. And could only BARELY be visible on another shot with another lens.

Considering the season (not a lot of shooting in America right now) and the seriousness of this, you need to locate a cardboard box immediately and get it to Canon.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Jan 15, 2007 09:02 |  #28

cosworth wrote in post #2544368 (external link)
Considering the season (not a lot of shooting in America right now) and the seriousness of this, you need to locate a cardboard box immediately and get it to Canon.

We have an excellent Canon repair facility a couple hours drive from here. I'll probably drive it over personally. Perhaps when they see the distraught look on my face, they'll take pity and do a rush job for me.

I still want to play around with it and see if I get the effect on any other lenses.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jan 15, 2007 10:32 |  #29

belmondo wrote in post #2544399 (external link)
We have an excellent Canon repair facility a couple hours drive from here. I'll probably drive it over personally. Perhaps when they see the distraught look on my face, they'll take pity and do a rush job for me.

I still want to play around with it and see if I get the effect on any other lenses.


Could be that the only reason that you're seeing it with this lens (so far) is that you're shooting at a slower shutter speed with the 400/5.6. Test it with a multitude of shutter speeds to see if it affects the results.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prep
Member
245 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Perth WA
     
Jan 15, 2007 10:35 |  #30

The shutter is going, and starting to bounce at the end of its travel. I see a Canon in your future...

AIR, some Ds's have this very early for some reason. It band is a smaller one than others I've seen, vertically, so a shorter lens with a greater angle of incedence than the 400 may
not show it. It also tends to be quite intermitant at first.


~pr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,310 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Possible Problem with 1Ds Mk II. Opinions?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1545 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.