Thought I would give the Sigma another go, so popped back to the shop
35mm f/2
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
30mm f/2
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
35mm f/2.8
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
30mm f/2.8
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
30mm f/1.4
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
I would say, from the test my 35mm is sharper that the 30mm - end of storey
I have confirmed that my 35mm is beter at f/2.8 than f/2, nothing new hear but thats where I have been going wrong with pictures I have taken with it as I have always set it to f/2
I am now going to hang fire on the 35mm f/1.4 L and spend some more time with the 35mm f/2. It hasn't sold anyway so nowt lost
